Microcurrent Treatment for Chronic Debilitating Pain

To compare the efficacy of standard pain treatment and placebo (a microcurrent faux treatment) as opposed to standard pain treatment and microcurrent therapy in any primary care patients over a three month period.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Pain; Opioid Use
• Intervention / Treatment: Procedure: Standard treatment + placebo; Procedure: Standard treatment + Microcurrent Therapy

Detailed Description

This study is not intended to be definitive and should be considered an exploratory randomized trial to determine conditions for which microcurrent is more effective. Thus, extensive subgroup analyses will be performed so that definitive trials can be developed. This is a single-blind study where subjects will not know if they are receiving microcurrent treatment.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 200
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Nevada
    • Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, United States, 89191
      • Mike O'Callaghan Military Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

**Patients must be able to get care at Nellis Air Force Base (a military installation) in order to participate in this study**

Inclusion Criteria:

• Male and female Active Duty members and DoD beneficiaries
• Age 18 years or older
• Chronic debilitating pain
• PROMIS-57 T score is 60 or above

Exclusion Criteria:

• Pregnant
• Implanted pacemaker
• Spinal cord stimulator
• Illicit drug use including marijuana use
• Epilepsy or a history of seizures
• Other implanted device (e.g., insulin pump, opioid pump, or defibrillator)
• Chronic debilitating pain referred or recruited as measured by PROMIS-57 T score is below 60

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Standard treatment + placebo; Placing the microcurrent pads on the patient but not turning on the microcurrent box for 30 minutes once a week for 6 weeks	Procedure: Standard treatment + placebo; Placebo microcurrent
Experimental: Standard treatment + Microcurrent Therapy; 100-300µA microcurrent delivered for 20-300 minutes, once a week for 6 weeks	Procedure: Standard treatment + Microcurrent Therapy; Actual microcurrent

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) -57 Profile standardized T-Scores	PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). In most cases 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population. PROMIS-57 is a collection of 8-item short forms assessing anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities as well as a single pain intensity item.	PRE-TREATMENT: time 0 (week 0)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) -57 Profile standardized T-Scores	PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). In most cases 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population. PROMIS-57 is a collection of 8-item short forms assessing anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities as well as a single pain intensity item.	PRE-TREATMENT: time 1 (week 1)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) -57 Profile standardized T-Scores	PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). In most cases 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population. PROMIS-57 is a collection of 8-item short forms assessing anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities as well as a single pain intensity item.	PRE-TREATMENT: time 2 (week 2)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) -57 Profile standardized T-Scores	PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). In most cases 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population. PROMIS-57 is a collection of 8-item short forms assessing anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities as well as a single pain intensity item.	PRE-TREATMENT: time 3 (week 3)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) -57 Profile standardized T-Scores	PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). In most cases 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population. PROMIS-57 is a collection of 8-item short forms assessing anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities as well as a single pain intensity item.	PRE-TREATMENT: time 4 (week 4)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) -57 Profile standardized T-Scores	PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). In most cases 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population. PROMIS-57 is a collection of 8-item short forms assessing anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities as well as a single pain intensity item.	PRE-TREATMENT: time 5 (week 5)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) -57 Profile standardized T-Scores	PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). In most cases 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population. PROMIS-57 is a collection of 8-item short forms assessing anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities as well as a single pain intensity item.	PRE-TREATMENT: time 6 (week 12)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) -57 Profile standardized T-Scores	PROMIS-57 is a collection of 8-item short forms assessing anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities as well as a single pain intensity item.	POST-TREATMENT: time 0 (week 0)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) -57 Profile standardized T-Scores	PROMIS-57 is a collection of 8-item short forms assessing anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities as well as a single pain intensity item.	POST-TREATMENT: time 1 (week 1)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) -57 Profile standardized T-Scores	PROMIS-57 is a collection of 8-item short forms assessing anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities as well as a single pain intensity item.	POST-TREATMENT: time 2 (week 2)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) -57 Profile standardized T-Scores	PROMIS-57 is a collection of 8-item short forms assessing anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities as well as a single pain intensity item.	POST-TREATMENT: time 3 (week 3)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) -57 Profile standardized T-Scores	PROMIS-57 is a collection of 8-item short forms assessing anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities as well as a single pain intensity item.	POST-TREATMENT: time 4 (week 4)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) -57 Profile standardized T-Scores	PROMIS-57 is a collection of 8-item short forms assessing anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities as well as a single pain intensity item.	POST-TREATMENT: time 5 (week 5)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) -57 Profile standardized T-Scores	PROMIS-57 is a collection of 8-item short forms assessing anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities as well as a single pain intensity item.	POST-TREATMENT: time 6 (week 12)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) -57 Profile standardized T-Scores	PROMIS-57 is a collection of 8-item short forms assessing anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities as well as a single pain intensity item.	SCREENING
Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP)	MYMOP measures the outcomes that the patient considers the most important.The patient chooses one or two symptoms that they are seeking help with, and that they consider to be the most important. They also choose an activity of daily living that is limited or prevented by this problem. These choices are written down in the patient's own words and the patient scores them for severity over the past week on a seven-point scale. Lastly wellbeing is scored on a similar scale. Produces a 7-point scale (0=as good as it could be, 6=as bad as it could be) for individual items of Symptoms, Activity, and Wellbeing as well as the MYMOP profile score	PRE-TREATMENT: time 0 (week 0)
Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP)	MYMOP measures the outcomes that the patient considers the most important.The patient chooses one or two symptoms that they are seeking help with, and that they consider to be the most important. They also choose an activity of daily living that is limited or prevented by this problem. These choices are written down in the patient's own words and the patient scores them for severity over the past week on a seven-point scale. Lastly wellbeing is scored on a similar scale. Produces a 7-point scale (0=as good as it could be, 6=as bad as it could be) for individual items of Symptoms, Activity, and Wellbeing as well as the MYMOP profile score	PRE-TREATMENT: time 1 (week 1)
Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP)	MYMOP measures the outcomes that the patient considers the most important.The patient chooses one or two symptoms that they are seeking help with, and that they consider to be the most important. They also choose an activity of daily living that is limited or prevented by this problem. These choices are written down in the patient's own words and the patient scores them for severity over the past week on a seven-point scale. Lastly wellbeing is scored on a similar scale. Produces a 7-point scale (0=as good as it could be, 6=as bad as it could be) for individual items of Symptoms, Activity, and Wellbeing as well as the MYMOP profile score	PRE-TREATMENT: time 2 (week 2)
Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP)	MYMOP measures the outcomes that the patient considers the most important.The patient chooses one or two symptoms that they are seeking help with, and that they consider to be the most important. They also choose an activity of daily living that is limited or prevented by this problem. These choices are written down in the patient's own words and the patient scores them for severity over the past week on a seven-point scale. Lastly wellbeing is scored on a similar scale. Produces a 7-point scale (0=as good as it could be, 6=as bad as it could be) for individual items of Symptoms, Activity, and Wellbeing as well as the MYMOP profile score	PRE-TREATMENT: time 3 (week 3)
Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP)	MYMOP measures the outcomes that the patient considers the most important.The patient chooses one or two symptoms that they are seeking help with, and that they consider to be the most important. They also choose an activity of daily living that is limited or prevented by this problem. These choices are written down in the patient's own words and the patient scores them for severity over the past week on a seven-point scale. Lastly wellbeing is scored on a similar scale. Produces a 7-point scale (0=as good as it could be, 6=as bad as it could be) for individual items of Symptoms, Activity, and Wellbeing as well as the MYMOP profile score	PRE-TREATMENT: time 4 (week 4)
Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP)	MYMOP measures the outcomes that the patient considers the most important.The patient chooses one or two symptoms that they are seeking help with, and that they consider to be the most important. They also choose an activity of daily living that is limited or prevented by this problem. These choices are written down in the patient's own words and the patient scores them for severity over the past week on a seven-point scale. Lastly wellbeing is scored on a similar scale. Produces a 7-point scale (0=as good as it could be, 6=as bad as it could be) for individual items of Symptoms, Activity, and Wellbeing as well as the MYMOP profile score	PRE-TREATMENT: time 5 (week 5)
Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP)	MYMOP measures the outcomes that the patient considers the most important.The patient chooses one or two symptoms that they are seeking help with, and that they consider to be the most important. They also choose an activity of daily living that is limited or prevented by this problem. These choices are written down in the patient's own words and the patient scores them for severity over the past week on a seven-point scale. Lastly wellbeing is scored on a similar scale. Produces a 7-point scale (0=as good as it could be, 6=as bad as it could be) for individual items of Symptoms, Activity, and Wellbeing as well as the MYMOP profile score	PRE-TREATMENT: time 6 (week 12)
Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP)	MYMOP measures the outcomes that the patient considers the most important.On follow-up questionnaires the wording of the previously chosen items is unchanged. Produces a 7-point scale (0=as good as it could be, 6=as bad as it could be) for individual items of Symptoms, Activity, and Wellbeing as well as the MYMOP profile score	POST-TREATMENT: time 0 (week 0)
Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP)	MYMOP measures the outcomes that the patient considers the most important.On follow-up questionnaires the wording of the previously chosen items is unchanged. Produces a 7-point scale (0=as good as it could be, 6=as bad as it could be) for individual items of Symptoms, Activity, and Wellbeing as well as the MYMOP profile score	POST-TREATMENT: time 1 (week 1)
Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP)	MYMOP measures the outcomes that the patient considers the most important.On follow-up questionnaires the wording of the previously chosen items is unchanged. Produces a 7-point scale (0=as good as it could be, 6=as bad as it could be) for individual items of Symptoms, Activity, and Wellbeing as well as the MYMOP profile score	POST-TREATMENT: time 2 (week 2)
Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP)	MYMOP measures the outcomes that the patient considers the most important.On follow-up questionnaires the wording of the previously chosen items is unchanged. Produces a 7-point scale (0=as good as it could be, 6=as bad as it could be) for individual items of Symptoms, Activity, and Wellbeing as well as the MYMOP profile score	POST-TREATMENT: time 3 (week 3)
Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP)	MYMOP measures the outcomes that the patient considers the most important.On follow-up questionnaires the wording of the previously chosen items is unchanged. Produces a 7-point scale (0=as good as it could be, 6=as bad as it could be) for individual items of Symptoms, Activity, and Wellbeing as well as the MYMOP profile score	POST-TREATMENT: time 4 (week 4)
Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP)	MYMOP measures the outcomes that the patient considers the most important.On follow-up questionnaires the wording of the previously chosen items is unchanged. Produces a 7-point scale (0=as good as it could be, 6=as bad as it could be) for individual items of Symptoms, Activity, and Wellbeing as well as the MYMOP profile score	POST-TREATMENT: time 5 (week 5)
Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP)	MYMOP measures the outcomes that the patient considers the most important.On follow-up questionnaires the wording of the previously chosen items is unchanged. Produces a 7-point scale (0=as good as it could be, 6=as bad as it could be) for individual items of Symptoms, Activity, and Wellbeing as well as the MYMOP profile score	POST-TREATMENT: time 6 (week 12)
Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)	The DVPRS consists of an 11-point numerical rating scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain. It has been confirmed for reliability and validity in measuring both acute and chronic pain, and is currently the standard for pain measurement throughout DoD and VHA health systems. The DVPRS has demonstrated linear scale qualities allowing parametric methods to be used.	PRE-TREATMENT: time 0 (week 0)
Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)	The DVPRS consists of an 11-point numerical rating scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain. It has been confirmed for reliability and validity in measuring both acute and chronic pain, and is currently the standard for pain measurement throughout DoD and VHA health systems. The DVPRS has demonstrated linear scale qualities allowing parametric methods to be used.	PRE-TREATMENT: time 1 (week 1)
Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)	The DVPRS consists of an 11-point numerical rating scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain. It has been confirmed for reliability and validity in measuring both acute and chronic pain, and is currently the standard for pain measurement throughout DoD and VHA health systems. The DVPRS has demonstrated linear scale qualities allowing parametric methods to be used.	PRE-TREATMENT: time 2 (week 2)
Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)	The DVPRS consists of an 11-point numerical rating scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain. It has been confirmed for reliability and validity in measuring both acute and chronic pain, and is currently the standard for pain measurement throughout DoD and VHA health systems. The DVPRS has demonstrated linear scale qualities allowing parametric methods to be used.	PRE-TREATMENT: time 3 (week 3)
Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)	The DVPRS consists of an 11-point numerical rating scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain. It has been confirmed for reliability and validity in measuring both acute and chronic pain, and is currently the standard for pain measurement throughout DoD and VHA health systems. The DVPRS has demonstrated linear scale qualities allowing parametric methods to be used.	PRE-TREATMENT: time 4 (week 4)
Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)	The DVPRS consists of an 11-point numerical rating scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain. It has been confirmed for reliability and validity in measuring both acute and chronic pain, and is currently the standard for pain measurement throughout DoD and VHA health systems. The DVPRS has demonstrated linear scale qualities allowing parametric methods to be used.	PRE-TREATMENT: time 5 (week 5)
Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)	The DVPRS consists of an 11-point numerical rating scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain. It has been confirmed for reliability and validity in measuring both acute and chronic pain, and is currently the standard for pain measurement throughout DoD and VHA health systems. The DVPRS has demonstrated linear scale qualities allowing parametric methods to be used.	PRE-TREATMENT: time 6 (week 6)
Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)	The DVPRS consists of an 11-point numerical rating scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain. It has been confirmed for reliability and validity in measuring both acute and chronic pain, and is currently the standard for pain measurement throughout DoD and VHA health systems. The DVPRS has demonstrated linear scale qualities allowing parametric methods to be used.	POST-TREATMENT: time 0 (week 0)
Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)	The DVPRS consists of an 11-point numerical rating scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain. It has been confirmed for reliability and validity in measuring both acute and chronic pain, and is currently the standard for pain measurement throughout DoD and VHA health systems. The DVPRS has demonstrated linear scale qualities allowing parametric methods to be used.	POST-TREATMENT: time 1 (week 1)
Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)	The DVPRS consists of an 11-point numerical rating scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain. It has been confirmed for reliability and validity in measuring both acute and chronic pain, and is currently the standard for pain measurement throughout DoD and VHA health systems. The DVPRS has demonstrated linear scale qualities allowing parametric methods to be used.	POST-TREATMENT: time 2 (week 2)
Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)	The DVPRS consists of an 11-point numerical rating scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain. It has been confirmed for reliability and validity in measuring both acute and chronic pain, and is currently the standard for pain measurement throughout DoD and VHA health systems. The DVPRS has demonstrated linear scale qualities allowing parametric methods to be used.	POST-TREATMENT: time 3 (week 3)
Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)	The DVPRS consists of an 11-point numerical rating scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain. It has been confirmed for reliability and validity in measuring both acute and chronic pain, and is currently the standard for pain measurement throughout DoD and VHA health systems. The DVPRS has demonstrated linear scale qualities allowing parametric methods to be used.	POST-TREATMENT: time 4 (week 4)
Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)	The DVPRS consists of an 11-point numerical rating scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain. It has been confirmed for reliability and validity in measuring both acute and chronic pain, and is currently the standard for pain measurement throughout DoD and VHA health systems. The DVPRS has demonstrated linear scale qualities allowing parametric methods to be used.	POST-TREATMENT: time 5 (week 5)
Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)	The DVPRS consists of an 11-point numerical rating scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain. It has been confirmed for reliability and validity in measuring both acute and chronic pain, and is currently the standard for pain measurement throughout DoD and VHA health systems. The DVPRS has demonstrated linear scale qualities allowing parametric methods to be used.	POST-TREATMENT: time 6 (week 6)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Opioids taken	Opioids taken measured in morphine equivalent units (MEU; milligrams)	screening, time 0 (week 0), time 1 (week 1), time 2 (week 2), time 3 (week 3), time 4 (week 4), time 5 (week 5), time 6 (week 12)

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Paul Crawford

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Levy B, Paulozzi L, Mack KA, Jones CM. Trends in Opioid Analgesic-Prescribing Rates by Specialty, U.S., 2007-2012. Am J Prev Med. 2015 Sep;49(3):409-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.020. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
• Strauch B, Herman C, Dabb R, Ignarro LJ, Pilla AA. Evidence-based use of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in clinical plastic surgery. Aesthet Surg J. 2009 Mar-Apr;29(2):135-43. doi: 10.1016/j.asj.2009.02.001.
• Rohde C, Chiang A, Adipoju O, Casper D, Pilla AA. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on interleukin-1 beta and postoperative pain: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot study in breast reduction patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Jun;125(6):1620-1629. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c9f6d3.
• Varney SM, Bebarta VS, Mannina LM, Ramos RG, Ganem VJ, Carey KR. Emergency medicine providers' opioid prescribing practices stratified by gender, age, and years in practice. World J Emerg Med. 2016;7(2):106-10. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2016.02.004.
• Jeffery DD, Babeu LA, Nelson LE, Kloc M, Klette K. Prescription drug misuse among U.S. active duty military personnel: a secondary analysis of the 2008 DoD survey of health related behaviors. Mil Med. 2013 Feb;178(2):180-95. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-12-00192.
• Jeffery DD, May L, Luckey B, Balison BM, Klette KL. Use and abuse of prescribed opioids, central nervous system depressants, and stimulants among U.S. active duty military personnel in FY 2010. Mil Med. 2014 Oct;179(10):1141-8. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00002.
• Chen JH, Humphreys K, Shah NH, Lembke A. Distribution of Opioids by Different Types of Medicare Prescribers. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Feb;176(2):259-61. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6662. No abstract available.
• Gabriel A, Sobota R, Gialich S, Maxwell GP. The use of Targeted MicroCurrent Therapy in postoperative pain management. Plast Surg Nurs. 2013 Jan-Mar;33(1):6-8; quiz 9-10. doi: 10.1097/PSN.0b013e3182844219.
• Pilla A, Fitzsimmons R, Muehsam D, Wu J, Rohde C, Casper D. Electromagnetic fields as first messenger in biological signaling: Application to calmodulin-dependent signaling in tissue repair. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011 Dec;1810(12):1236-45. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 8.
• Iodice P, Lessiani G, Franzone G, Pezzulo G. Efficacy of pulsed low-intensity electric neuromuscular stimulation in reducing pain and disability in patients with myofascial syndrome. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2016 Apr-Jun;30(2):615-20.
• Taylor AG, Anderson JG, Riedel SL, Lewis JE, Kinser PA, Bourguignon C. Cranial electrical stimulation improves symptoms and functional status in individuals with fibromyalgia. Pain Manag Nurs. 2013 Dec;14(4):327-335. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2011.07.002. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
• Rajpurohit B, Khatri SM, Metgud D, Bagewadi A. Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and microcurrent electrical nerve stimulation in bruxism associated with masticatory muscle pain--a comparative study. Indian J Dent Res. 2010 Jan-Mar;21(1):104-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.62816.
• Koopman JS, Vrinten DH, van Wijck AJ. Efficacy of microcurrent therapy in the treatment of chronic nonspecific back pain: a pilot study. Clin J Pain. 2009 Jul-Aug;25(6):495-9. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31819a6f3e.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): December 9, 2019
• Primary Completion (Actual): June 1, 2022
• Study Completion (Actual): June 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: July 2, 2019
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 3, 2019
• First Posted (Actual): July 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): August 25, 2022
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 23, 2022
• Last Verified: August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Other Study ID Numbers: FWH20190097h

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No