Optical Tissue Identification for Myocardial Architecture (OPTIMA)

June 13, 2023 updated by: Aditya Kaza

Optical Tissue Identification for Myocardial Architecture (OPTIMA Study)

The goal of this study is to test the hypothesis that fiberoptic confocal microscopy (FCM) imaging during repair of common congenital heart defects is a useful adjunct for avoidance of conduction abnormalities.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is an interventional randomized controlled study to investigate the use of fiberoptic confocal microscopy (FCM) imaging for avoidance of conduction abnormalities during repair of common congenital heart defects. Study results will be compared to a cohort of similar surgical patients following standard surgical procedures where FCM was not used. We will analyze pre-and postoperative ECGs to identify conduction abnormalities.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Boston Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 month to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 30 days to less than 18 years old
  • Patients with planned surgical repair of:
  • Ventricular septal defect (VSD)
  • Complete atrioventricular canal (CAVC)
  • Tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) with pulmonary stenosis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior history of adverse reaction to fluorescein sodium
  • Prior history of renal failure or abnormal renal function
  • Baseline PR interval > 220 msec or 98% for age
  • Baseline HR > 98% for age
  • Underlying genetic syndrome associated with progressive AV block or sinus node dysfunction (e.g. Holt-Oram or NKX2.5)
  • Any surgical repair that requires staging or palliation
  • Pregnant or lactating
  • Exclusions specific to type of surgical repair
  • Apical muscular VSD
  • ToF with pulmonary atresia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Non-imaging cohort
There will be no intervention for the non-imaging group. Subjects will receive standard of care for cardiac surgery.
Experimental: Imaging cohort
Up to 5mL of 1:1000 dilute fluorescite will be applied to cardiac tissue prior to imaging with Cellvizio 100 Series System with Confocal Miniprobes. The system will be used to assist the investigator with the operative course.
1 mL of Fluorescite will be diluted into 1L of saline. Up to 5mLs of the 1:1000 diluted solution will be applied topically to the cardiac tissue prior to imaging.
Other Names:
  • fluorescein sodium
The microscopy system will image cardiac tissue.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of new conduction disorders
Time Frame: Immediately post-surgery
Rate of new conduction disorders post-surgery will be determined by electrophysiologist read and compared between the two groups
Immediately post-surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in PR interval
Time Frame: 1 year post-surgery
PR interval will be compared between baseline, post-op, and 1 year follow up
1 year post-surgery
Change in QTc interval
Time Frame: 1 year post-surgery
QTc interval will be compared between baseline, post-op, and 1 year follow up
1 year post-surgery
Change in QRS interval
Time Frame: Approximately 5 days post-surgery and 1 year post-surgery
QRS interval will be compared between baseline, post-op, and 1 year follow up
Approximately 5 days post-surgery and 1 year post-surgery
Degree of heart block
Time Frame: 1 year post-surgery
Degree of heart block will be assessed at post-op and 1 year follow up
1 year post-surgery
Pacemaker implantation
Time Frame: 1 year post-surgery
Incidence of temporary and permanent pacemaker implantation will be collected
1 year post-surgery
Time to temporary pacing wire removal prior to discharge
Time Frame: Surgery to discharge (approximately 5 days)
If a temporary pacing wire is placed, time to removal will be collected
Surgery to discharge (approximately 5 days)
Residual lesion score (RLS) at discharge
Time Frame: Surgery to discharge (approximately 5 days)
RLS will be compared between groups
Surgery to discharge (approximately 5 days)
Need for repeat bypass
Time Frame: 1 day
Need for repeat bypass for residual lesions during surgery will be collected
1 day
Adverse events
Time Frame: 1 year post-surgery
Rates of adverse events will be collected and compared between the two group
1 year post-surgery
Ease of use
Time Frame: 1 day
Surgeon feedback regarding using the FCM system will be collected using a brief survey
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aditya K Kaza, MD, Boston Children's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 20, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There is no plan to share individual participant data to other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Complete Atrioventricular Canal

Clinical Trials on Fluorescite

3
Subscribe