Clinical Performance of MTA Cavity Lining in the Treatment of Deep Caries Lesions

July 12, 2019 updated by: Uzay Koc, Hacettepe University

Clinical Performance of MTA Cavity Lining in the Treatment of Deep Caries Lesions: A 4- Year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Aim of this clinical study is to compare the clinical success of two lining materials regarding the maintenance of pulp vitality in the treatment of deep caries lesions over 4- years.

A hundred permanent premolar and molars with deep caries lesions without pulp involvement (aged between 18 and 30 years) in 73 patients were randomly divided into the following groups: calcium hydroxide cement (Ca(OH)2) (Dycal, Dentsply/Caulk, Dentsply International Inc, Milford, DE, USA) group and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) (Dentsplay, Tulsa Dental, Johnson city, USA) group. Final restoration with a resin-based composite (Gradia Direct Posterior, GC, Tokyo, Japan) in a single session was performed. The following-up period was 6-, 12-, 24-, 36- and 48-months. Two calibrated examiners performed the clinical examination of the pulpal symptoms

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Aim of this clinical study is to compare the clinical outcomes of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) cavity lining with calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) regarding the maintenance of pulp vitality in the treatment of deep caries lesions over 4- years.

Materials and Methods: A hundred permanent premolar and molars with deep caries lesions without pulp involvement (aged between 18 and 30 years) in 73 patients were randomly divided into the following groups: calcium hydroxide cement (Ca(OH)2) (Dycal, Dentsply/Caulk, Dentsply International Inc, Milford, DE, USA) group and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) (Dentsplay, Tulsa Dental, Johnson city, USA) group. Final restoration with a resin-based composite (Gradia Direct Posterior, GC, Tokyo, Japan) in a single session was performed. The following-up period was 6-, 12-, 24-, 36- and 48-months. Two calibrated examiners performed the clinical examination of the pulpal symptoms. The data will be analyzed with Pearson chi-square, Fisher exact and logrank statistics tests (p < 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis will be conducted to reveal the survival rate.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

73

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 28 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Primary deep caries lesion with risk of pulp exposure (radiograph depth reaching 3/4 of the dentin).
  2. Restorable by direct restoration and functional permanent posterior teeth,
  3. Positive response to electric pulp testing and negative response to thermal testing.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Two or more cuspal loss 2. Caries beneath the gingival margin 3. Spontaneous pain history 4. Presence of any periapical pathology 5. Immature teeth with open apex 6. Pathologic mobility

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MTA
mineral trioxide aggregate
Indirect capping with MTA
Active Comparator: Dycal
calcium hydroxide cement
Indirect capping with Dycal

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluating of clinical success of restorations
Time Frame: 6 months
The treatment consequence was judged as "clinically successful" when the following criteria were met: positive response to electric pulp testing, negative response to cold stimuli by air-water shrinkage, no general pain, normal response to tactile tests or triggered pain not lingering, no evidence of abscess, sinus tract and no abnormal tooth mobility. These teeth were considered to be "clinically healthy" and the treatment was successful.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 7, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 7, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 7, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Indirect Pulp Capping

Clinical Trials on MTA

3
Subscribe