Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy in Resectable Oesophageal Carcinoma(NewEC Study)

Clinical Evidence for Association of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy With Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Resectable Esophageal Carcinoma (NewEC Study)

To provide comprehensive efficacy and safety profiles of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) versus surgery alone in resectable oesophageal carcinoma.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) has been shown to be better than surgery alone in patients with resectable oesophageal carcinoma, but higher quality evidence is needed as new findings have emerged regarding this issue.Previous evidence-based findings and the current guidelines have not established a survival advantage of NCRT over NCT or an acceptable safety profile of the addition of radiotherapy to NCT; whether NCRT or NCT is more effective for the treatment of adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus is unclear.This study aims to provide comprehensive efficacy and safety profiles of NCRT versus NCT versus surgery alone in resectable oesophageal carcinoma.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

423

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510000
        • Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510000
        • Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 01748
        • Massachusetts General Hospital of Harvard Medical School

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with histologically documented untreated SCC or adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction that was clinically staged as stage I-III (T1-3, N0-1 and M0) as assessed by a contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomography (CT) scan, positron emission tomography, or endoscopic ultrasonography were eligible.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with histologically documented untreated SCC or adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction.
  • Patients clinically staged as stage I-III (T1-3, N0-1 and M0) as assessed by a contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomography (CT) scan, positron emission tomography, or endoscopic ultrasonography.
  • Patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients had received any previous treatment for oesophageal cancer.
  • Patients who were unsuitable for surgery because of comorbidities.
  • Patients had evidence of distant metastatic disease by history and physical examination.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
Patients who had chemoradiotherapy before surgery.
In most patients, the chemotherapy regimens before surgery were consisted of cisplatin combined with either fluorouracil or taxanes.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Patients who had chemotherapy before surgery.
In most patients, the chemotherapy regimens before surgery were consisted of cisplatin combined with either fluorouracil or taxanes.
Surgery alone
Patients who only had oesophagectomy. Various surgical oesophagectomy methods were used, such as Ivor Lewis, transthoracic, three-hole, transhiatal, and left transthoracic. The appropriate surgical approach for each patient was chosen according to the tumour location, size, and depth.
Various surgical oesophagectomy methods were used, such as Ivor Lewis, transthoracic, three-hole, transhiatal, and left transthoracic,and the appropriate surgical approach for each patient was chosen according to the tumour location, size, and depth.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: 5 years
The OS was calculated as the time from the date of the histologically documented diagnosis to the date of death or the final follow-up.
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease-free survival (DFS)
Time Frame: 5 years
DFS was calculated from the date of R0 resection to the date of disease recurrence or death from any cause
5 years
R0 resection rate
Time Frame: Baseline
R0 resection was defined as gross disease removed with negative margins (tumour-free resection margin).
Baseline
Pathologic complete response (pCR)
Time Frame: Baseline
pCR was defined as no evidence of residual tumour cells in the primary site and resected lymph nodes of the operative specimens.
Baseline
30-day postoperative or in-hospital mortality
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Haiyu Zhou, PhD, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Michael Lanuti, PhD, Massachusetts General Hospital of Harvard Medical School

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 14, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 22, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The datasets used or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chemotherapy Effect

Clinical Trials on Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

3
Subscribe