- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04032171
Study of Evobrutinib in Participants With RMS
July 13, 2021 updated by: EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.
A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel Group, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Active Controlled Study of Evobrutinib Compared With an Interferon Beta 1a (Avonex®), in Participants With RMS to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety
The study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of evobrutinib administered orally twice daily versus Interferon-beta-1a (Avonex®), once a week intramuscularly in participants with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (RMS).
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
1
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Darmstadt, Germany, 64293
- Please Contact the Communication Center
-
-
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Rockland, Massachusetts, United States, 02370
- Please Contact U.S. Medical Information
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 55 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants diagnosed with RMS (relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis [RRMS] or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis [SPMS] with relapses) in accordance with 2017 Revised McDonald criteria (Thompson 2018).
- Participants with one or more documented relapses within the 2 years before Screening with either: a. one relapse which occurred within the last year prior to randomization, OR b. the presence of at least 1 gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) T1 lesion within 6 months prior to randomization.
- Participants have EDSS score of 0 to 5.5 at Baseline. Participants with an EDSS score <= 2 at screening are only eligible for participation if their disease duration (time since onset of symptoms) is no more than 10 years.
- Participants are neurologically stable for >= 30 days prior to both screening and baseline.
- Female participants must be neither pregnant nor breast-feeding and must lack child-bearing potential, as defined by either: post-menopausal or surgically sterile or use an effective method of contraception for the duration of the study.
- Participants have given written informed consent prior to any study-related procedure.
- Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants diagnosed with Progressive MS, in accordance with the 2017 Revised McDonald criteria as follows: a). Participants with Primary Progressive MS. b). Participants with secondary progressive MS without evidence of relapse.
- Disease duration more than (>) 10 years in participants with an EDSS =< 2.0 at screening.
- Immunologic disorder other than MS, or any other condition requiring oral, intravenous (IV) , intramuscular, or intra-articular corticosteroid therapy, with the exception of well-controlled Type 2 diabetes mellitus or well controlled thyroid disease.
- Other protocol defined exclusion criteria could apply.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Evobrutinib + Avonex® matched Placebo
Participants received active evobrutinib twice daily (BID) along with concomitant intramuscular (IM) injection of placebo matched to Avonex® once a week.
Treatment period was planned to be of 96 weeks.
|
Participants received evobrutinib twice daily (BID).
Other Names:
Participants received IM injection of placebo matched to avonex® once a week.
|
|
Active Comparator: Avonex® + Evobrutinib matched Placebo
Participants received IM injection of active Avonex® once a week along with concomitant placebo matched to evobrutinib BID.
Treatment period was planned to be of 96 weeks.
|
Participants received avonex® IM injection once a week.
Participants received placebo matched to evobrutinib twice a day.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)
Time Frame: At Week 96
|
The annualized relapse rate at 96 weeks was to be calculated based on qualified relapses.
A qualifying relapse is the occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to MS.
The relapse should be accompanied by an increase of 0.5 points or more on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), or 2 points increase on one of the Functional System Scores (FSS), or 1 point increase on at least two of the FSS.
The increase in FSS scores must be related to the neurological symptoms which were reported as new or worsening.
|
At Week 96
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to First Occurrence of 12-Week Confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression
Time Frame: Baseline up to 96 weeks
|
EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that measures disability in participants with MS.
EDSS progression is defined as an increase of 1 point or more from Baseline EDSS score when the Baseline score is 5.0 or less, and an increase of 0.5 points or more when the Baseline score is 5.5 or greater.
Time to first occurrence of 12-week confirmed EDSS progression is defined as the time from randomization to the first EDSS progression event that was confirmed at a regularly scheduled visit at least 12 weeks later.
|
Baseline up to 96 weeks
|
|
Time to First Occurrence of 24-Week Confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression
Time Frame: Baseline up to 96 weeks
|
EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that measures disability in participants with MS.
EDSS progression is defined as an increase of 1 point or more from Baseline EDSS score when the Baseline score is 5.0 or less, and an increase of 0.5 points or more when the Baseline score is 5.5 or greater.
Time to first occurrence of 24-week confirmed EDSS progression is defined as the time from randomization to the first EDSS progression event that was confirmed at a regularly scheduled visit at least 24 weeks later.
|
Baseline up to 96 weeks
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) Short Form Score at Week 96
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96
|
The PROMIS PF Short Form is specific to measuring the physical function domain of MS patients, with each item on the form scored on a T-score metric.
Higher scores indicate higher PF.
Change from baseline at Week 96 is the difference between the PROMIS PF scores at 96 weeks and at baseline.
|
Baseline, Week 96
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form Score at Week 96
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 96
|
The PROMIS Fatigue Short Form is specific to measuring the fatigue domain of MS patients, with each item on the form scored on a T-score metric.
Higher scores indicate higher fatigue.
Change from baseline at Week 96 is the difference between the PROMIS Fatigue scores at 96 weeks and at baseline.
|
Baseline, Week 96
|
|
Total Number of Gadolinium-Enhancing (Gd+) Time Constant 1 (T1) Lesions Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans at Week 24, 48, and 96
Time Frame: At Week 24, 48 and 96
|
Total number of Gd+ T1 lesions was to be assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
|
At Week 24, 48 and 96
|
|
Total Number of New or Enlarging Time Constant 2 (T2) Lesions Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans at Week 24, 48, and 96
Time Frame: At Week 24, 48 and 96
|
Total number of new or enlarging T2 lesions was to be assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
|
At Week 24, 48 and 96
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
Time Frame: Baseline up to 254 days
|
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal relationship with this treatment.
Therefore, an AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, regardless if it is considered related to the medicinal product.
TEAE is an AE that started after study drug treatment; or if the event was continuous from baseline & was serious, related to investigational medicinal product (IMP), or resulted in death, discontinuation, interruption or reduction of study therapy.
TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs.
AESIs included liver AEs (possible drug-induced, non-infectious, non-alcoholic and immune-mediated) infections (serious and opportunistic infections), lipase and amylase elevation, and seizure.
|
Baseline up to 254 days
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Based on Severity According to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (NCI-CTCAE v4.03)
Time Frame: Baseline up to 254 days
|
Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, which does not necessarily have causal relationship with treatment.
A serious AE was defined as an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged in participant hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important.
TEAEs included both serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs.
Severity of TEAEs were graded using NCI CTCAE v4.03 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 1= Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death.
Number of participants with TEAEs based on severity were reported.
|
Baseline up to 254 days
|
|
Vital Signs: Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
Time Frame: At Day 1, Week 2 unscheduled 1, Week 12 and Early Discontinuation (ED) (up to approximately 36 weeks
|
DBP and SBP were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest for the participants at indicated time points.
|
At Day 1, Week 2 unscheduled 1, Week 12 and Early Discontinuation (ED) (up to approximately 36 weeks
|
|
Vital Signs: Pulse Rate
Time Frame: At Day 1, Week 2 unscheduled 1, Week 12 and Early Discontinuation ED (up to approximately 36 weeks)
|
Pulse rate was measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest for the participants at indicated time points.
|
At Day 1, Week 2 unscheduled 1, Week 12 and Early Discontinuation ED (up to approximately 36 weeks)
|
|
Vital Signs: Respiratory Rate
Time Frame: At Day 1, Week 2 unscheduled 1, Week 12 and Early Discontinuation ED (up to approximately 36 weeks)
|
Respiration rate was measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest for the participants at indicated time points.
|
At Day 1, Week 2 unscheduled 1, Week 12 and Early Discontinuation ED (up to approximately 36 weeks)
|
|
Vital Signs: Temperature
Time Frame: At Day 1, Week 2 unscheduled 1, Week 12 and Early Discontinuation (ED) (up to approximately 36 weeks)
|
Temperature was measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest for the participants at indicated time points.
|
At Day 1, Week 2 unscheduled 1, Week 12 and Early Discontinuation (ED) (up to approximately 36 weeks)
|
|
Vital Signs: Weight
Time Frame: At Day 1, Week 2 unscheduled 1, Week 12 and Early Discontinuation (up to approximately 36 weeks)
|
At Day 1, Week 2 unscheduled 1, Week 12 and Early Discontinuation (up to approximately 36 weeks)
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Lab Values
Time Frame: Baseline up to 254 days
|
The total number of participants with laboratory test abnormalities was assessed.
Clinical laboratory tests included hematology, coagulation, biochemistry and urinalysis.
|
Baseline up to 254 days
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Time Frame: Baseline up to 254 days
|
ECG parameters included heart rhythm, heart rate, QRS intervals, QT intervals, RR intervals and corrected QT (QTc) intervals.
|
Baseline up to 254 days
|
|
Absolute Concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) A Level
Time Frame: At Day 1 and Day 92
|
Absolute concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) A was reported.
|
At Day 1 and Day 92
|
|
Absolute Concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) G Level
Time Frame: At Day 1 and Day 92
|
Absolute concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) E was reported.
|
At Day 1 and Day 92
|
|
Absolute Concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) M Level
Time Frame: At Day 1 and Day 92
|
Absolute concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) M was reported.
|
At Day 1 and Day 92
|
|
Absolute Concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) E Level
Time Frame: At Day 1 and Day 92
|
Absolute concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) E was reported.
|
At Day 1 and Day 92
|
|
Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (Ig) A Level
Time Frame: At Day 1 and Day 92
|
Change from baseline in immunoglobulin (Ig) A level was reported.
|
At Day 1 and Day 92
|
|
Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (Ig) E Level
Time Frame: At Day 1 and Day 92
|
Change from baseline in immunoglobulin (Ig) E level was reported.
|
At Day 1 and Day 92
|
|
Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (Ig) G Level
Time Frame: At Day 1 and Day 92
|
Change from baseline in immunoglobulin (Ig) G level was reported.
|
At Day 1 and Day 92
|
|
Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (Ig) M Level
Time Frame: At Day 1 and Day 92
|
Change from baseline in immunoglobulin (Ig) M level was reported.
|
At Day 1 and Day 92
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 10, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 20, 2020
Study Completion (Actual)
May 20, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 23, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
July 25, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 5, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 13, 2021
Last Verified
July 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Nervous System Diseases
- Immune System Diseases
- Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS
- Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
- Demyelinating Diseases
- Autoimmune Diseases
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Sclerosis
- Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Anti-Infective Agents
- Antiviral Agents
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Immunologic Factors
- Adjuvants, Immunologic
- Interferon beta-1a
Other Study ID Numbers
- MS200527_0074
- 2018-004700-19 (EudraCT Number)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Yes
IPD Plan Description
Per company policy, following approval of a new product or a new indication for an approved product in both the EU and the US, EMD Serono will share study protocols, anonymized patient level and study level data and redacted clinical study reports from clinical trials in patients with qualified scientific and medical researchers, upon request, as necessary for conducting legitimate research.
Further information on how to request data can be found on our website https://www.emdgroup.com/en/research/our-approach-to-research-and-development/healthcare/clinical-trials/commitment-responsible-data-sharing.html.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis
-
BiogenWithdrawnRelapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis | Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis
-
Cabaletta BioNot yet recruitingProgressive Multiple Sclerosis | Multiple Sclerosis | Multiple Sclerosis (Relapsing Remitting) | Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (RMS) | Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (PMS) | Multiple Sclerosis (MS) - Relapsing-remitting | Multiple Sclerosis - Relapsing Remitting
-
Bristol-Myers SquibbActive, not recruitingRelapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)Spain
-
Hoffmann-La RochePPD Development, LPActive, not recruitingRelapsing-Remitting Multiple SclerosisUnited States, Spain, Canada, Portugal, India, United Kingdom, Belgium, France, Brazil, Austria, Germany, Hungary, Estonia, Poland, Mexico, Australia, Italy, Ukraine, Serbia, Latvia, Morocco, Argentina, Switzerland, Greece, Romania
-
BiogenWithdrawn
-
BiogenAbbVieTerminatedMultiple Sclerosis | Relapsing-Remitting Multiple SclerosisUnited States, Denmark, Italy, United Kingdom, Czechia, Canada, Hungary, Spain, Australia, Israel, Georgia, Serbia, Russian Federation, Ukraine, India, Poland, Brazil, France, Argentina, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Mexico, Moldova, Republic... and more
-
EMD SeronoPfizerCompletedRelapsing-remitting Multiple SclerosisUnited States, United Kingdom, Argentina, Austria, Brazil, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Russian Federation, Spain, Switzerland
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...Immune Tolerance Network (ITN)CompletedRelapsing-Remitting Multiple SclerosisUnited States
-
BiogenTerminatedRelapsing-Remitting Multiple SclerosisUnited States, Spain, Germany, Australia, Sweden, Czechia, France, Italy, United Kingdom
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsWithdrawnMultiple Sclerosis (Relapsing Remitting)
Clinical Trials on Evobrutinib
-
Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate...Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, GermanyCompleted
-
Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate...Completed
-
Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate...Completed
-
Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate...Completed
-
Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate...Completed
-
EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, GermanyTerminatedSystemic Lupus ErythematosusPhilippines, United States, Korea, Republic of, Malaysia, Taiwan, Germany, Italy, Poland, Mexico, Bulgaria, Peru, Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Japan, Mauritius, Romania, Russian Federation, South Africa
-
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, GermanyCompleted
-
EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, GermanyCompletedLupus Erythematosus, SystemicUnited States, Bulgaria
-
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, GermanyCompleted
-
Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate...Completed