- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04546789
Effect of Hepatic Impairment on M2951 (BTK Inhibitor) PK
October 8, 2025 updated by: Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Phase I Open-label, Single Dose Study to Investigate the Effect of Hepatic Impairment on the PK of Evobrutinib (M2951)
This study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety of M2951 (Bruton's tyrosine kinase [BTK] inhibitor) in participants with different degrees of hepatic impairment compared to participants with normal hepatic function.
Study Overview
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
24
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Kiel, Germany
- CRS Clinical Research Services Kiel GmbH
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 79 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants with normal hepatic function only will be overtly healthy as determined by medical evaluation, including no clinically significant abnormality identified on physical examination or laboratory evaluation and no active clinically significant disorder, condition, infection or disease that would pose a risk to participant safety or interfere with the study evaluation, procedures, or completion OR
- Participants with moderately impaired hepatic function only will be considered to have moderately (Child-Pugh class B and confirmed liver cirrhosis) impaired hepatic function and has been clinically stable for at least 1 month prior to Screening OR
- Participants with mildly impaired hepatic function only will be considered to have mildly (Child-Pugh class A and confirmed liver cirrhosis) impaired hepatic function and has been clinically stable for at least 1 month prior to Screening
- Have a body weight within 50.0 and 120.0 kilogram (kg) and body mass index (BMI) within the range 19.0 and 36.0 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
- Female participants are not pregnant or breastfeeding, and at least one of the following conditions applies
- Not a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP)
- Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply
Exclusion Criteria:
- Clinical history of autoimmune disorder with hepatic influence (Hashimoto thyroiditis and rheumatic diseases allowed)
- History of any malignancy
- Diseases and surgeries of the gastrointestinal tract, which could influence the gastrointestinal anatomy and mobility. Prior history of cholecystectomy or inflammatory bowel disease, and any clinically relevant surgery within 6 months prior to Screening
- History of chronic or recurrent acute infection or any bacterial, viral, parasitic or fungal infections within 30 days prior to Screening and at any time between Screening and admission, or hospitalization due to infection within 6 months prior to Screening
- History of shingles within 12 months prior to Screening
- History of drug hypersensitivity, ascertained or presumptive allergy/hypersensitivity to the active drug substance and/or formulation ingredients; history of serious allergic reactions leading to hospitalization or any other hypersensitivity reaction in general, which may affect the safety of the participant and/or outcome of the trial per the Investigator's discretion
- Participants with impaired hepatic function will be excluded who had Primary and secondary biliary cirrhosis.
- Participants with impaired hepatic function will be excluded with Clinical evidence of severe ascites.
- Participants with impaired hepatic function will be excluded with Hepatic encephalopathy Grade greater than 1
- Other protocol defined exclusion criteria could apply
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group 1: Normal Hepatic Function (Reference)
Participants with normal hepatic function received single oral dose of 30 milligrams (mg) M2951 (3 film-coated tablets of 10 mg) on Day 1 after a standard breakfast.
|
Participants received a single oral dose of M2951 (BTK inhibitor) on Day 1.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Group 2: Mild Hepatic Impairment
Participants with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class A, score 5 to 6) received single oral dose of 30 mg M2951 (3 film-coated tablets of 10 mg) on Day 1 after a standard breakfast.
The Child-Pugh Score was a scoring system used to determine the prognosis with cirrhosis and need for liver transplantation.
Scoring is based upon serum albumin, ascites, serum bilirubin, prothrombin time, and encephalopathy.
Each category is based on a scoring system of 1-3 with 3 being the worst and a total score range of 5-15.
It is broken into categories A (score of 5-6), B (score of 7-9), and C (score of 10-15) with worsening from A to C for prognosis.
|
Participants received a single oral dose of M2951 (BTK inhibitor) on Day 1.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Group 3: Moderate Hepatic Impairment
Participants with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class B, score 7 to 9) received single oral dose of 30 mg M2951 (3 film-coated tablets of 10 mg) on Day 1 after a standard breakfast.
The Child-Pugh Score was a scoring system used to determine the prognosis with cirrhosis and need for liver transplantation.
Scoring is based upon serum albumin, ascites, serum bilirubin, prothrombin time, and encephalopathy.
Each category is based on a scoring system of 1-3 with 3 being the worst and a total score range of 5-15.
It is broken into categories A (score of 5-6), B (score of 7-9), and C (score of 10-15) with worsening from A to C for prognosis.
|
Participants received a single oral dose of M2951 (BTK inhibitor) on Day 1.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of M2951
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, 12.0, 16.0, 24.0 and 32.0 hours post-dose
|
AUC0-inf was calculated by combining AUC0-tlast and AUCextra.
AUCextra represents an extrapolated value obtained by Clast pred/Lambda z, where Clast pred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration is at or above the Lower Limit of quantification (LLOQ) and Lambda z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined by log-linear regression analysis of the measured plasma concentrations of the terminal log-linear phase.
|
Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, 12.0, 16.0, 24.0 and 32.0 hours post-dose
|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of M2951
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, 12.0, 16.0, 24.0 and 32.0 hours post-dose
|
Cmax was obtained directly from the plasma concentration versus time curve.
|
Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, 12.0, 16.0, 24.0 and 32.0 hours post-dose
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: up to follow-up (Day 6)
|
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug.
A serious AE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important.
TEAEs were defined as events that started or worsened that in severity after at least one dose of the study intervention has been administered.
TEAEs included both serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs.
|
up to follow-up (Day 6)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets and Reticulocytes
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
Blood samples were collected in a fasted condition (after a fast of at least 8 hours) to analyze the hematology parameters: basophils, eosinophils, leukocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, platelets and reticulocytes.
Change from baseline in hematology parameters: basophils, eosinophils, leukocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, platelets, and reticulocytes at Day 2 and Day 6 were reported.
|
Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes, Neutrophils/Leukocytes and Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
Blood samples were collected in a fasted condition (after a fast of at least 8 hours) to analyze the hematology parameters: basophils/leukocytes, eosinophils/leukocytes, lymphocytes/leukocytes, monocytes/leukocytes, neutrophils/leukocytes and reticulocytes/erythrocytes.
Change From Baseline in hematology parameters: basophils/leukocytes, eosinophils/leukocytes, lymphocytes/leukocytes, monocytes/leukocytes, neutrophils/leukocytes and reticulocytes/erythrocytes at Day 2 and Day 6 were reported in percentage.
|
Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
Blood samples were collected in a fasted condition (after a fast of at least 8 hours) to analyze the hematology parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular hemoglobin.
Change from baseline in hematology parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular hemoglobin at Day 2 and Day 6 were reported.
|
Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
Blood samples were collected in a fasted condition (after a fast of at least 8 hours) to analyze the hematology parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume.
Change from baseline in hematology parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume at Day 2 and Day 6 were reported.
|
Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
Blood samples were collected in a fasted condition (after a fast of at least 8 hours) to analyze the hematology parameters: erythrocytes.
Change from baseline in hematology parameters: erythrocytes at Day 2 and Day 6 were reported.
|
Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
Blood samples were collected in a fasted condition (after a fast of at least 8 hours) to analyze the hematology parameter: hematocrit.
Change from baseline in hematology parameter: hematocrit at Day 2 and Day 6 were reported.
|
Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
Blood samples were collected in a fasted condition (after a fast of at least 8 hours) to analyze the hematology parameter: hemoglobin.
Change from baseline in hematology parameter: hemoglobin at Day 2 and Day 6 were reported.
|
Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
Blood samples were collected in a fasted condition (after a fast of at least 8 hours) to analyze the hematology parameter: Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio.
International Normalized Ratio (INR) is calculated based on the prothrombin time (PT) test results.
The INR is the ratio of a participant's prothrombin time to a normal (control) sample, raised to the power of the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) value for the analytical system being used.
Change from baseline in hematology parameter: prothrombin international normalized ratio at Day 2 and Day 6 were reported.
|
Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Prothrombin Time
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
Blood samples were collected in a fasted condition (after a fast of at least 8 hours) to analyze the hematology parameter: prothrombin time.
Prothrombin Time measures how long it takes for a clot to form in a blood sample.
Change from baseline in hematology parameter: prothrombin time at Day 2 and Day 6 were reported.
|
Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Creatine Kinase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase, Lactate Dehydrogenase, Lipase
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
Blood samples were collected in a fasted condition (after a fast of at least 8 hours) to analyze the chemistry parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Creatine Kinase (CK), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) and Lipase.
Change from baseline in chemistry parameters: ALT, ALP, Amylase, AST, CK, GGT, LDH and Lipase at Day 2 and Day 6 were reported.
|
Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Albumin and Protein
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
Blood samples were collected in a fasted condition (after a fast of at least 8 hours) to analyze the chemistry parameters: Albumin and Protein.
Change from baseline in chemistry parameters: albumin and protein level at Day 2 and Day 6 were reported.
|
Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin, Creatinine and Urate
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
Blood samples were collected in a fasted condition (after a fast of at least 8 hours) to analyze the chemistry parameters: Bilirubin, Creatinine and Urate.
Change from baseline in chemistry parameters: bilirubin, creatinine and urate level at Day 2 and Day 6 were reported.
|
Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameter: C Reactive Protein
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
Blood samples were collected in a fasted condition (after a fast of at least 8 hours) to analyze the chemistry parameter: C Reactive Protein.
Change from baseline in chemistry parameters: C Reactive Protein level at Day 2 and Day 6 were reported.
|
Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Magnesium, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urea and Urea Nitrogen
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
Blood samples were collected in a fasted condition (after a fast of at least 8 hours) to analyze the chemistry parameters: Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Magnesium, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urea and Urea Nitrogen.
Change from baseline in chemistry parameters: Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Glucose, Magnesium, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Triglycerides, Urea and Urea Nitrogen level at Day 2 and Day 6 were reported.
|
Baseline, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
|
Change From Baseline in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameter: Heart Rate
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 1 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
12-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participants have rested for at least 5 minutes in supine position by using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate.
Change from baseline in 12-lead ECG parameter: heart rate at Day 1 and Day 6 were reported.
|
Baseline, Day 1 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
|
Change From Baseline in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters: PQ/PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, Corrected QT Interval Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) and RR Duration at Day 1 and Day 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 1 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
12-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participants have rested for at least 5 minutes in supine position by using an ECG machine that automatically measures PQ/PR, QRS, QT, and QTc intervals and RR duration.
Change From Baseline in 12-ECG parameters: PQ/PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, QTcF interval and RR duration at Day 1 and Day 6 were reported.
|
Baseline, Day 1 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
SBP and DBP were measured in the semi-supine position with a completely automated device after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet sitting without distractions.
Change from baseline in SBP and DBP at Days 1, 2 and 6 were reported.
|
Baseline, Day 1, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameter: Pulse Rate
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
Pulse rate was measured in the semi-supine position with a completely automated device after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions.
Change from baseline in vital sign parameter: pulse rate at Days 1, 2 and 6 were reported.
|
Baseline, Day 1, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameter: Respiratory Rate
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
Respiratory rate was measured in the semi-supine position with a completely automated device after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions.
Change from baseline in vital sign parameter: respiratory rate at Days 1, 2 and 6 were reported.
|
Baseline, Day 1, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameter: Temperature
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
Temperature was measured in the semi-supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions.
Change from baseline in vital sign parameter: temperature at Days 1, 2 and 6 were reported.
|
Baseline, Day 1, Day 2 and follow-up (Day 6)
|
|
Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of M2951
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, 12.0, 16.0, 24.0 and 32.0 hours post-dose
|
Tmax was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve.
|
Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, 12.0, 16.0, 24.0 and 32.0 hours post-dose
|
|
Apparent Elimination Half Life (t1/2) of M2951
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, 12.0, 16.0, 24.0 and 32.0 hours post-dose
|
T1/2 was defined as the time required for the concentration or amount of drug in the body to be reduced by one-half.
T1/2 was calculated by natural log 2 divided by Lambda z.
Lambda z was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression method.
|
Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, 12.0, 16.0, 24.0 and 32.0 hours post-dose
|
|
Area Under The Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Time 12 Hours (AUC0-12) of M2951
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0 and 12.0 hours post-dose
|
AUC0-12 of M2951 was defined as the area under the plasma concentration time curve from time 0 to 12 hours post-dose.
|
Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0 and 12.0 hours post-dose
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Time 24 Hours (AUC0-24) of M2951
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, 12.0, 16.0 and 24.0 hours post-dose
|
AUC0-24 of M2951 was defined as the area under the plasma concentration time curve from time 0 to 24 hours post-dose.
|
Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, 12.0, 16.0 and 24.0 hours post-dose
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-tlast) of M2951
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, 12.0, 16.0, 24.0 and 32.0 hours post-dose
|
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last sampling time t at which the concentration was at or above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ).
AUC0-tlast was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.
|
Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, 12.0, 16.0, 24.0 and 32.0 hours post-dose
|
|
Apparent Total Body Clearance (CL/f) of M2951
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, 12.0, 16.0, 24.0 and 32.0 hours post-dose
|
CL/f was a measure of the rate at which a drug was metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes.
CL/f was calculated as Dose/AUC0-inf, where AUC0-inf was estimated by determining the total area under the curve of the concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity.
AUC0-inf was calculated as AUC0-t + Clast pred/Lambda Z, where Clast pred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) and Lambda Z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve.
|
Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, 12.0, 16.0, 24.0 and 32.0 hours post-dose
|
|
Apparent Volume of Distribution During Terminal Phase (VZ/f) of M2951
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, 12.0, 16.0, 24.0 and 32.0 hours post-dose
|
Vz/f is defined as the distribution of a study drug between plasma and the rest of the body after oral dosing.
Vz/f = Dose/(AUC0-infinity multiply by Lambda z) following single dose.
AUC0-inf was calculated by combining AUC0-tlast and AUCextra.
AUCextra represents an extrapolated value obtained by Clast pred/Lambda z, where Clast pred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration is at or above the Lower Limit of quantification (LLOQ) and Lambda z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined by log-linear regression analysis of the measured plasma concentrations of the terminal log-linear phase.
|
Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, 12.0, 16.0, 24.0 and 32.0 hours post-dose
|
|
Fraction of Unbound Drug (fu) of M2951
Time Frame: 1.5, 4, and 12 hours post-dose
|
fu is defined as the ratio of unbound drug concentration to the total drug concentration.
|
1.5, 4, and 12 hours post-dose
|
|
Area Under Plasma Concentration for Unbound Drug (M2951) From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf,u)
Time Frame: 1.5, 4, and 12 hours post-dose
|
AUC0-inf,u was calculated as fu * AUC0-inf.
fu was defined as the ratio of unbound drug concentration to the total drug concentration.
AUC0-inf was calculated by combining AUC0-t and AUCextra.
AUCextra represents an extrapolated value obtained by Clast pred/Lambda z, where Clast pred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration is at or above the Lower Limit of quantification (LLOQ) and Lambda z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined by log-linear regression analysis of the measured plasma concentrations of the terminal log-linear phase.
|
1.5, 4, and 12 hours post-dose
|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Unbound M2951 (Cmax, u)
Time Frame: 1.5, 4, and 12 hours post-dose
|
Cmax,u was calculated as fu * Cmax.
fu was defined as the ratio of unbound drug concentration to the total drug concentration.
Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve.
|
1.5, 4, and 12 hours post-dose
|
|
Apparent Oral Clearance (CL,u/F) of Unbound M2951
Time Frame: 1.5, 4, and 12 hours post-dose
|
CL,u/F was calculated as Dose divided by AUC0-inf, u.
AUC0-inf,u was calculated as fu * AUC0-inf.
fu was defined as the ratio of unbound drug concentration to the total drug concentration.
AUC0-inf was calculated by combining AUC0-t and AUCextra.
AUCextra represents an extrapolated value obtained by Clast pred/Lambda z, where Clast pred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration is at or above the Lower Limit of quantification (LLOQ) and Lambda z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined by log-linear regression analysis of the measured plasma concentrations of the terminal log-linear phase.
|
1.5, 4, and 12 hours post-dose
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Study Director: Medical Responsible, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 30, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 16, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
May 16, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 10, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 10, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
September 14, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
October 28, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 8, 2025
Last Verified
September 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MS200527_0059
- 2020-001920-32 (EudraCT Number)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
We are committed to enhancing public health through responsible sharing of clinical trial data.
Following approval of a new product or a new indication for an approved product in both the US and the European Union, the study sponsor and/or its affiliated companies will share study protocols, anonymized patient data and study level data, and redacted clinical study reports with qualified scientific and medical researchers, upon request, as necessary for conducting legitimate research.
Further information on how to request data can be found on our website http://bit.ly/IPD21
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hepatic Impairment
-
PfizerCompletedHealthy Volunteers | Moderate Hepatic Impairment | Severe Hepatic ImpairmentUnited States
-
GlycoMimetics IncorporatedCompletedModerate Hepatic Impairment | Normal Hepatic FunctionUnited States
-
Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.Medivation, Inc.CompletedSevere Hepatic Impairment | Normal Hepatic FunctionBulgaria
-
Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CompletedModerate Hepatic ImpairmentUnited States
-
ExelixisRecruitingHepatic Impairment | Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentUnited States
-
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCCompletedModerate Hepatic ImpairmentUnited States
-
EQRx International, Inc.CompletedSevere Hepatic ImpairmentUnited States
-
PfizerCompleted
-
TakedaCompletedSevere Hepatic ImpairmentUnited States
-
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCRecruitingHepatic Impairment (HI)United States
Clinical Trials on M2951 (BTK inhibitor)
-
Ascentage Pharma Group Inc.Recruiting
-
Peking University People's HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Jiangsu HengRui Medicine Co., Ltd.Completed
-
Principia Biopharma, a Sanofi CompanyPrincipia Biopharma Australia Pty Ltd.CompletedPemphigus VulgarisIsrael, Australia, Greece, Croatia, France
-
Fei LiNot yet recruiting
-
Qi dengNot yet recruitingImmune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) | BTK Inhibitors | Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (AIHA) | Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody
-
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical...Recruiting
-
Jason Robert GotlibNational Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedSystemic Mastocytosis | Mast Cell Leukemia | Aggressive Systemic MastocytosisUnited States
-
Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate...Completed
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterTerminatedRecurrent Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia | Adult B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia | Adult B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia With t(9;22)(q34;q11.2); BCR-ABL1United States