PAVES Benchmarking Pilot Study of Daily Disposable Contact Lenses (PAVES)

October 5, 2020 updated by: Vision Service Plan

The study will compare the short-term clinical performance and wearer and practitioner acceptability in a pilot study of a new-to-market spherical silicone hydrogel daily disposable soft contact lens (SiHyDD) to three (3) benchmark soft daily disposable lenses (DD) and, subsequently, of a new-to-market hydrogel spherical daily disposable (HydDD) soft contact lens to three (3) other hydrogel daily disposable lenses. .

The primary outcome variables for this study are subjective comfort and lens preference.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The objective of the study is to compare the short-term clinical performance and wearer and practitioner acceptability in a pilot study of a new-to-market spherical silicone hydrogel olifilcon B with Tangible Coating daily disposable soft contact lens (SiHyDD) to three (3) benchmark soft daily disposable lenses (DD) and, subsequently, of a new-to-market hydrogel etafilcon A with Tangible Coating spherical daily disposable (HydDD) soft contact lens to three (3) other hydrogel daily disposable lenses. .

The primary outcome variables for this study are subjective comfort and lens preference.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

144

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30324
        • Ross Eyecare
    • Illinois
      • Niles, Illinois, United States, 60714
        • Professional Eye Care Center
    • Indiana
      • Carmel, Indiana, United States, 46032
        • RevolutionEyes
    • Massachusetts
      • Andover, Massachusetts, United States, 01810
        • Andover Optometry on Central
    • Ohio
      • Westerville, Ohio, United States, 43081
        • Professional VisionCare
    • Tennessee
      • Brentwood, Tennessee, United States, 37027
        • Primary Eyecare Group, PC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 42 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy full-time wearers of spherical daily disposable contact lenses
  • Vision correctable to 20/30 with spherical lenses in powers from +3.00 to +1.00 DS and from -1.00 to -7.00 DS
  • Visual acuity corrected to at least 20/30 with spherical contact lens

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participating in another clinical trial
  • Vision not correctable to 20/30 with lens powers listed above

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: A1 - SiHyDD to Moist
1 week of Test SiHyDD contact lenses followed by cross over to 1 week of 1-DAY ACUVUE® Moist contact lenses.
Daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lens
Active Comparator: A2 - Moist to SiHyDD
1 week of 1-DAY ACUVUE® Moist contact lenses followed by cross over to 1 week of Test SiHyDD contact lenses.
Daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lens
Active Comparator: A3 - SiHyDD to OASDD
1 week of Test SiHyDD contact lenses followed by cross over to 1 week of ACUVUE® OASYS 1-Day contact lenses.
Daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lens
Active Comparator: A4 - OASDD to SiHyDD
1 week of ACUVUE® OASYS 1-Day contact lenses followed by cross over to 1 week of Test SiHyDD contact lenses.
Daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lens
Active Comparator: A5 - SiHyDD to DT1
1 week of Test SiHyDD contact lenses followed by cross over to 1 week of Alcon DAILIES TOTAL 1® contact lenses.
Daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lens
Active Comparator: A6 - DT1 to SiHyDD
1 week of Alcon DAILIES TOTAL 1® contact lenses followed by cross over to 1 week of Test SiHyDD contact lenses.
Daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lens
Active Comparator: B1 - HydDD to Moist
1 week of Test HydDD contact lenses followed by cross over to 1 week of 1-DAY ACUVUE® Moist contact lenses.
Daily disposable hydrogel contact lens
Active Comparator: B2 - Moist to HydDD
1 week of 1-DAY ACUVUE® Moist contact lenses followed by cross over to 1 week of Test HydDD contact lenses.
Daily disposable hydrogel contact lens
Active Comparator: B3 - HydDD to BioTrue
1 week of Test HydDD contact lenses followed by cross over to 1 week of BIOTRUE ONEday® contact lenses.
Daily disposable hydrogel contact lens
Active Comparator: B4 - BioTrue to HydDD
1 week of BIOTRUE ONEday® contact lenses followed by cross over to 1 week of Test HydDD contact lenses.
Daily disposable hydrogel contact lens
Active Comparator: B5 - HydDD to AqCom+
1 week of Test HydDD contact lenses followed by cross over to 1 week of DAILIES® AquaComfort PLUS® contact lenses.
Daily disposable hydrogel contact lens
Active Comparator: B6 - AqCom+ to HydDD
1 week of DAILIES® AquaComfort PLUS® contact lenses followed by cross over to 1 week of Test HydDD contact lenses.
Daily disposable hydrogel contact lens

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective Lens Preference
Time Frame: Visit 3 - Approximately 2 weeks
Subjective preference for either lens intervention or no preference. Likert question with forced preference for Test or Benchmark lens or no preference.
Visit 3 - Approximately 2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
8-item Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) score
Time Frame: Visit 2 and 3 - Approximately 1 and 2 weeks, respectively
Difference in CLDEQ-8 score with treatments relative to score with habitual lenses. The scale on the 8-item CLDEQ-8 instrument is from 1 to 33, with each item having a possible 4 or 5 points.
Visit 2 and 3 - Approximately 1 and 2 weeks, respectively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robin L Chalmers, OD, Clinical Trial Consultant

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 2, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 2, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • VS-19-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Refractive Errors

Clinical Trials on Phase A - olifilcon B with Tangible Coatings

Subscribe