Fast Track Pathway to Accelerated Cholecystectomy (FAST)

April 28, 2025 updated by: P.J. Devereaux

Fast Track Pathway to Accelerated Cholecystectomy Versus Standard of Care for Acute Cholecystitis

More than 10% of Canadians have gallstones, and approximately 10% of these individuals will develop gallbladder inflammation related to gallstones, which is referred to as acute cholecystitis (AC). Patients with AC who do not have their gallbladder surgically removed have a 30% risk of serious complications that can lead to death. Surgery is the only definitive treatment for AC, however, there is controversy regarding the ideal timing of surgery. The two main approaches are early surgery (typically within 7 days of diagnosis) or delayed surgery (7 days to 6 weeks after diagnosis). Although preliminary evidence suggests that early surgery is associated with shorter hospital length of stay, lower risk for complications, and lower costs, practice varies widely regarding the timing of surgery. The limitations of the existing studies include small sample sizes, varied definitions of early versus delayed surgery, and an imbalance of risk between study groups. The proposed pilot study aims to inform the design of a large clinical trial that will compare the outcomes of patients with AC who receive accelerated surgery (i.e., as soon as possible with a goal of surgery within 6 hours of diagnosis) with those who receive standard care.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The prevalence of gallstones is 10% and approximately 10% of patients develop acute cholecystitis (AC). AC prevalence increases with age and complications are as high as 30% in patients who do not undergo surgery, the only definitive treatment. There is controversy regarding ideal surgical timing. Previously, delayed surgery was thought to decrease bile duct injuries resulting from active inflammation. However, the state of persistent inflammation, hypercoagulability, and stress can cause medical complications such as myocardial injury. Chronic inflammation can lead to fibrosis, adhesions and higher chance of bile duct injuries during delayed surgery. There is also concern for recurrent AC episodes, recurrent pain, biliary pancreatitis, cholangitis or sepsis.

Recent studies suggest that early surgery may be associated with better outcomes, but practice remains variable, ranging anywhere from early surgery (<7 days) to delayed surgery (>7 days). Among >24,000 Ontarians with AC admitted to 106 hospitals, timing of cholecystectomy varied widely across sites. Only 58% of patients underwent surgery within 7 days. High volume hospitals were more likely to perform early surgery.17

Among 14,200 Ontarians with AC, a propensity score analysis demonstrated that early surgery was associated with less bile duct injury (relative risk (RR)=0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.90) and shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) (mean 1.9 days, 95% CI 1.7-2.1). Early surgery was less costly and more effective than delayed cholecystectomy.

Trials of surgical timing in patients with AC are limited. The largest randomized controlled trial (RCT) compared early and delayed surgery for AC only included 618 patients.9 Cholecystectomy was performed a median of 1 day after randomization in the early group compared to a median of 25 days in the delayed group. Duration of surgery and conversion rate to open surgery were similar in both groups. Early surgery was associated with less morbidity (11.8% vs. 34.4%, p<0.001), shorter LOS (5.4 vs. 10.0 days, p<0.001), and lower cost (€2919 vs. €4262, p<0.001).

Multiple meta-analyses have suggested that early surgery for AC is associated with fewer wound infections (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.35-0.93) and have suggested a trend to fewer complications (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.42-1.03). Limitations of these meta-analyses include studies with small sample sizes, few events, wide confidence intervals, and variation in the definition of early surgery. Finally, there is a lack of strong evidence to make definitive conclusions regarding impact of early surgery in AC, which has led to substantial variation in clinical practice.

AC initiates inflammatory, hypercoagulable, and stress states that can cause medical complications. Early surgical treatment will reduce the time patients are exposed to these harmful states and therefore may reduce the risk of complications. Furthermore, rapid surgery results in a shorter period of AC, which may impact hospital costs. The goal is to undertake a large multicentre RCT of the impact of accelerated surgery (goal within 6 hours of diagnosis) vs. usual timing of surgery in patients with AC on a composite outcome of major clinical and surgical complications at 90 days. "Standard of care", as described, is highly variable and depends on the surgeon and hospital practice patterns.

The main objective of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of a large trial. The team hypothesizes that accelerated surgery for AC will improve clinical and surgical outcomes. A large RCT on this topic is needed for the following reasons: 1) time to surgery is a modifiable factor; 2) available data are encouraging, but not definitive; 3) there is variation in clinical practice across Ontario and internationally 4) the definition of early surgery has varied substantially across studies; 5) available data may be substantially underestimating the effect of timing of surgery because no trial has evaluated surgery within 6 hours of diagnosis; 6) high-quality evidence will modify clinical practice; and 7) implementation of accelerated surgery could save millions of healthcare dollars annually.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
        • St. Joseph's Healthcare
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
        • Hamilton General Hospital
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
        • Juravinski Hospital
      • London, Ontario, Canada
        • Lawson Health Research Institute, London Health Sciences Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥45 years; or age ≥18 years and <45 years with at least one of the following co-morbidities: diabetes or chronic respiratory, cardiovascular, or renal disease;
  2. Diagnosis of acute cholecystitis defined by the presence of at least 2 of the following:

    1. Abdominal pain in upper right quadrant,
    2. Murphy's sign,
    3. Leukocytosis >10 × 103/μl, or
    4. Oral temperature <36.5°C or >38°C;
  3. Cholelithiasis (stones/sludge);
  4. Ultrasound signs of cholecystitis;
  5. Acute cholecystitis that requires surgery and is diagnosed during working hours;
  6. Expected to require at least an overnight hospital admission after surgery; and
  7. Provide written informed consent to participate in FAST.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Patients requiring emergent surgery or emergent interventions for another reason;
  2. Patients whose therapeutic anticoagulation is not reversible;
  3. Patients with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and current use of warfarin with an INR ≥1.5;
  4. Pregnant patients;
  5. Previous participation in the trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard of Care
Patients randomized to the standard of care arm of the trial will not receive accelerated cholecystectomy surgery to correct cholecystitis. No services will be taken away but patients will continue with care as originally provided by the healthcare system.
Experimental: FAST Intervention
Patients diagnosed with cholecystitis and randomized to the FAST intervention arm of the study will undergo surgery as soon as possible with a goal of surgery within 6 hours of diagnosis.
If patients are randomized to the intervention arm of the study; said patient will undergo corrective cholecystectomy surgery to correct cholecystitis as soon as possible with a goal of surgery within 6 hours of diagnosis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility (pertaining to patient recruitment)
Time Frame: 1 year
Proportion of patients who are randomized into the trial.
1 year
Feasibility (pertaining to adherence to follow-up assessment)
Time Frame: 90 days post-randomization
Proportion of patients with missed assessments and incomplete data variables
90 days post-randomization
Feasibility (pertaining to patients who are randomized to Accelerated Care)
Time Frame: Within 6 hours after diagnosis of acute cholecystitis
Proportion of patients who have surgery initiated within 6 hours of the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis among those randomly assigned to accelerated care.
Within 6 hours after diagnosis of acute cholecystitis

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Cumulative length of hospital stay related to acute cholecystitis
2 weeks
Proportion of patients who experience e a composite of Clinical Outcomes
Time Frame: 90 days after randomization
Proportion of patients who experience: all-cause mortality, non-fatal sepsis, surgical site infection, pneumonia, Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, intra-abdominal abscess, bile duct injury, cystic duct stump leak, conversion to open surgery, intra-abdominal re-operation, intra-abdominal percutaneous or endoscopic re-intervention including placement of drain, embolization or Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography (ERCP), cholangitis, pancreatitis, myocardial injury, stroke, venous thromboembolism (VTE), new atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, new acute renal injury requiring dialysis and major bleeding.
90 days after randomization
Length of surgical procedure
Time Frame: 1 week
Length of surgical procedure related to acute cholecystitis
1 week
Proportion of patients who experience acute kidney injury
Time Frame: 90 days after randomization
Proportion of acute kidney injury events related to acute cholecystitis
90 days after randomization
Proportion of patients who are admitted to ICU within 90 days of randomization
Time Frame: 90 days after randomization
Proportion of patients who are admitted to ICU related to acute cholecystitis
90 days after randomization
Number of hospital readmissions within 90 days of randomization
Time Frame: 90 days after randomization
Number of hospital readmissions related to acute cholecystitis
90 days after randomization
Proportion of patients who experience peripheral arterial thrombosis within 90 days of randomization
Time Frame: 90 days after randomization
Proportion of patients who experience peripheral arterial thrombosis related to acute cholecystitis
90 days after randomization
Proportion of patients who experience intra-operative cholangiogram
Time Frame: 1 day
Rate of Cholangiogram related to acute cholecystitis
1 day
Subtotal cholecystectomy rate
Time Frame: 1 year
Rate of cholecystectomies
1 year
Proportion of postoperative ileus
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Proportion of postoperative ileus related to acute cholecystitis
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Flavia Kessler Borges PhD, M.D, Population Health Research Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Rahima Nenshi Msc, M.D, St. Joseph's Health Care London
  • Principal Investigator: PJ Devereaux PhD, M.D, Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 22, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2022

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cholecystitis

Clinical Trials on cholecystectomy

Subscribe