Seroma Reduction and Drain Free Mastectomy (SARA)

July 6, 2023 updated by: James van Bastelaar, Zuyderland Medisch Centrum
To prove that omitting drains after mastectomy and flap fixation does not contribute to higher incidence of seroma formation and therefore reducing patient disutility such as seroma aspirations and visits to the outpatient clinic, as well as reducing seroma related wound complications.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Rationale:

Seroma formation, a collection of serous fluid containing blood plasma and/or lymph fluid, is a common complication in breast cancer surgery and can lead to delayed wound healing, infection, skin flap necrosis, patient discomfort and repeated visits to the outpatient clinic and therefore extensive research has been done to further elucidate the pathophysiology and prevention of seroma formation. Promising results have resulted from studies focusing on flap fixation in order to reduce the incidence of seroma and seroma aspirations. Mastectomy with flap fixation is becoming standard practice and is currently combined with closed-suction drainage. Closed-suction drainage is considered gold standard for reducing seroma formation after breast cancer surgery. However, evidence shows that closed-suction drainage is insufficient in preventing seroma formation. One might wonder if there is still a place for closed-suction drainage after mastectomy if flap fixation is performed. The promising results in flap fixation could exclude drainage systems in breast cancer surgery. However, the available data consist of small case series and therefore a large randomized controlled trial is needed for it to be widely implemented.

To our knowledge, no randomized controlled trial has been conducted comparing flap fixation with and without closed-suction drainage with seroma aspiration as the primary outcome.

The investigators hypothesize that flap fixation with closed suction drainage does not cause a significant lower incidence of seroma aspirations, when compared to flap fixation alone. The investigators also expect that patients without drainage will experience significantly less discomfort and comparable rates of surgical site infections.

Objective: To prove that omitting drains after mastectomy and flap fixation does not contribute to higher incidence of seroma formation and therefore reducing patient disutility such as seroma aspirations and visits to the outpatient clinic, as well as reducing seroma related wound complications.

Study design: Prospective randomized controlled trial

Study population: Female patients > 18 years diagnosed with invasive breast cancer or DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ) with an indication to perform mastectomy

Intervention (if applicable):

  1. Mastectomy with flap fixation using sutures with closed suction drainage
  2. Mastectomy with flap fixation using sutures without closed suction drainage

Main study parameters/endpoints:

Patients undergoing seroma aspiration (clinically significant seroma (CSS)).

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:

Patients will be informed about the study before inclusion in the outpatient clinic. Informed consent will be obtained in the outpatient clinic a week after patients were initially informed. Postoperative check-ups will be done more frequently. Standard postoperative check-ups are planned at 2 weeks and 3 months. Additional study postoperative check-ups: 6 weeks, 6 months. Therefore, patients will be required to undergo two additional check-ups.

During out patients' visits, patients will hand in a questionnaire scale regarding cosmesis, pain and quality of life.

Patients will be clinically examined as they usually would be.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

250

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Older than 18 years
  • Female sex
  • Indication for mastectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing breast conserving therapy
  • Patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy
  • Patients undergoing direct breast reconstruction
  • Unable to comprehend implications and extent of study and sign for informed consent
  • Patients with radiation therapy of unilateral breast in previous history

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: With drain
Patients undergo mastectomy with flap fixation and low vacuum drainage.
Mastectomy with flap fixation with low vacuum drainage
Experimental: No drain
Patients undergo mastectomy with flap fixation and low vacuum drainage is omitted.
Mastectomy with flap fixation without low vacuum drainage

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Seroma aspiration of clinically significant seroma
Time Frame: During first six months post-operative

Proportion of patients undergoing seroma aspiration of clinically significant seroma

Clinically significant seroma defined as:

  1. Wound healing is at risk due to seroma (wound break down, seroma leakage, necrosis)
  2. There is discomfort or pain caused by large amounts of seroma, characterised by tenseness of the skin.
  3. There is contaminated/ infected seroma and aspiration is necessary to treat infection. All patients that undergo seroma aspiration due to infection will also be treated with a one week course of Augmentin 625 mg 3 times daily.
During first six months post-operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of invasive interventions related to seroma or wound healing
Time Frame: During first six months post-operative
Number of invasive interventions related to seroma or wound healing defined as: every aspiration of clinically significant seroma, incision and drainage of abscess or infected seroma and/or operative debriding of the wound.
During first six months post-operative
Surgical site infection (SSI) rate
Time Frame: During the first six postoperative months
Surgical site infection (SSI) rate, defined as redness, pain, heat or swelling at the site of the incision or by the drainage of pus. Infection rate will be measured by A) the need for antibiotics, B) seroma aspiration due to infection or C) surgical drainage.
During the first six postoperative months
Cosmesis
Time Frame: During the first six postoperative months
Cosmesis rated by the patient using the numeric rating scale (NRS) every planned outpatient clinic visit.
During the first six postoperative months
Quality of life measured using the SF-12 Health Survey
Time Frame: During the first six postoperative months
Quality of life measured using the SF-12 Health Survey. Resulting in 2 scores: the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS). Both range between values of 0-100 with a score of 50 representing values of a standard population
During the first six postoperative months
The number of outpatient department visits
Time Frame: During the first six months postoperative.
The number of outpatient department visits
During the first six months postoperative.
Experienced pain: NRS
Time Frame: During the first six months postoperative
Experienced wound pain and pain at the drain site by the patient using the NRS with a scale range from 0-10
During the first six months postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 26, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • METCZ2019016

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on With drain

3
Subscribe