Intuitive Control of a Hybrid Prosthetic Leg During Ambulation

May 16, 2024 updated by: Levi Hargrove, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
The objective of this research is to determine the clinical benefits of an innovative and lightweight powered leg controlled using our intent recognition framework in laboratory and community environments.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The hypothesis of this study is that using the Hybrid Leg with seamless, automatic transitions will result in participants choosing to become more active and improve their community participation compared to when using their own passive prosthetic leg.

The Hybrid Leg is an an innovative and lightweight powered leg that has 2 operating modes: active and passive. When in active mode, the Hybrid Leg is capable of supplying 120 NM of knee torque and actively repositioning the ankle during non-weight bearing phases of gait. When in passive mode, the motor and transmission are decoupled from the knee, which then behaves like an Ottobock 3R95 passive prosthetic knee, and the non-backdriveable mechanism of the ankle allows it to behave as an energy return foot. Allowing the device to behave passively if the battery becomes depleted or the actuators become damaged is an important enabling safety factor that will allow us to complete our study.

Phase 1: We will enroll 20 subjects a clinical trial of the leg and control system who will be fit with the Hybrid Leg and receive in-lab therapy to learn how to ambulate with the device.

Phase 2: Subjects will be randomized into a clinical trial of the leg and control system with an AB-BA design; condition A - subjects own device; condition B - Hybrid Leg. Subjects will complete an extensive ambulation and community mobility training to learn optimal use of their own passive device or the Hybrid Leg. After training the subjects will complete a full biomechanical analysis for each device as they complete ambulation circuits that include standing, level-ground walking, walking on slopes and on stairs, sit-stand transitions and transitions between these activities.

Phase 3: After completing phase 2 subjects will complete 4-week trials using their assigned prosthesis (Condition A or B) at home and within their community. During the trials subjects will be monitored using mobile phone based sensors and socket mounted activity monitor to determine how often the user performs the ambulation activities.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Recruiting
        • Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Levi Hargrove, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 95 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A unilateral or bilateral lower limb amputation
  • K2/K3/K4 ambulator with a prosthesis
  • English speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant new injury that would prevent use of a prosthesis: The ability to consistently wear a prosthesis and perform activities of daily living and specific performance tasks is necessary to evaluate the relative benefits of the interventions.
  • Cognitive impairment sufficient to adversely affect understanding of or compliance with study requirements, ability to communicate experiences, or ability to give informed consent: The ability to understand and comply with requirements of the study is essential in order for the study to generate useable, reliable data. The ability to obtain relevant user feedback through questionnaires and informal discussion adds significant value to this study.

    • Significant other comorbidity: Any other medical issues or injuries that would preclude completion of the study, use of the prostheses, or that would otherwise prevent acquisition of useable data by researchers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Condition A: Hybrid Leg
Subject will be trained on use of the experimental device, the Hybrid Leg.
The Hybrid Knee uses an actively variable transmission in combination of a passive spring/damper system. This allows the motor torque output to be adapted to the requirements of active dynamic tasks - changing the effective transmission ration from zero (fully passive) for level ground walking to a maximum value (fully active) for sit-to-stand transfers. This provides physiological knee torque and speed with a small motor and primary transmission system while also maximizing electrical efficiency, which minimized battery weight. The knee prototype weights 1.7kg. The Semi-active ankle can actively reposition during non-weight bearing phases of gait and uses a non back driveable transmission to maintain its set point during weight bearing activities.
Other: Condition B: Passive Leg
Subject will use their currently prescribed home passive prosthesis
Participants will participate in training sessions of community skills and advanced ambulation training for their home, prescribed passive prosthesis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average daily number of steps
Time Frame: 4 weeks - data collected during 4 week home trial of each device, analyzed upon completion of 4 week home trial
This outcome will be assessed using an accelerometery data measured using a mobile phone during the entire 4-week home trial of each device (Hybrid Leg and prescribed home device), resulting in a pair of outcomes for each subject. Statistical analysis will be done , first using a paired t-test (which assumes no carry-over and no device sequence effects), followed by the analysis using a linear mixed model with device and sequence group as fixed effects, and subject as the random effect. We expect that sequence will not be a statistically significant predictor, but that average daily steps will be significantly different between devices, with subjects taking significantly more steps when using the Hybrid Leg.
4 weeks - data collected during 4 week home trial of each device, analyzed upon completion of 4 week home trial
Average daily number of times subject switches between activities
Time Frame: 4 weeks - data collected during 4 week home trial of each device, analyzed upon completion of 4 week home trial
This outcome will be assessed using an accelerometery data measured using a mobile phone during the entire 4-week home trial of each device (Hybrid Leg and prescribed home device), resulting in a pair of outcomes for each subject. Statistical analysis will be done , first using a paired t-test (which assumes no carry-over and no device sequence effects), followed by the analysis using a linear mixed model with device and sequence group as fixed effects, and subject as the random effect. We expect that sequence will not be a statistically significant predictor, but that average transitions will be significantly different between devices, with subjects taking significantly more transitioning between activities more when using the Hybrid Leg.
4 weeks - data collected during 4 week home trial of each device, analyzed upon completion of 4 week home trial

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
10 Meter Walk Test
Time Frame: Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device
The 10mWT is used to assess walking speed in meters/second (m/s) over a short distance.
Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device
GPS tracking analysis
Time Frame: End of each 4 week home trial
Subject-specific map of movement within the community will be generated and investigated for individual changes in community mobility and cross-referenced with their survey results. These data could provide insight into how well patient-reported measures reflect actual community participation, although this possibility is acknowledged to be exploratory
End of each 4 week home trial
Six-Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device
The 6MWT is a sub-maximal exercise test used to assess walking endurance and aerobic capacity. Participants will walk around the perimeter of a set circuit for a total of six minutes.
Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device
Hill Assessment Index
Time Frame: Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device
The Hill Assessment Index (HAI) is a 12 level ordinal scale developed to address different characteristics of hill ascent and descent in preparation comparing different prosthetic knee units. The HAI assesses gait patterns on hills combined with assistive device usage reflecting the quality of independence.
Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device
Stair Assessment Index
Time Frame: Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device
The Stair Assessment Index is a 14 level ordinal scale that assesses the functional ability of transfemoral amputees for stair ascent and descent. It is being used as a physical measurement tool to document different gait styles on the stairs.
Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device
The Berg Balance Scale is a 14 item objective measure that assesses static balance and fall risk in adults.
Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device
Functional Gait Assessment
Time Frame: Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device
The FGA is used to assess postural stability during walking and assesses an individual's ability to perform multiple motor tasks while walking. The tool is a modification of the 8-item Dynamic Gait Index, developed to improve reliability and reduce ceiling effect.
Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device
5 Times Sit to Stand
Time Frame: Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device
The Five Times Sit to Stand Test measures one aspect of transfer skill. The test provides a method of quantify functional lower extremity strength and /or identify movement strategies a patient used to complete transitional movements.
Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device
4 -Square Step Test
Time Frame: Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device
Test of dynamic balance that clinically assesses the person's ability to step over objects forward, sideways, and backwards.
Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device
Amputee Mobility Predictor
Time Frame: Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device
This instrument measures the ambulatory potential of lower limb amputees with and without the use of a prosthesis. It assesses the mobility of people with lower limb amputation prior to prosthetic fitting and predicts function following prosthetic prescription.
Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire
Time Frame: Completion of each 4 week home trial
The PEQ is a self-report questionnaire containing 54 questions that provide functional outcome measures in prosthetics that are more tuned to prosthesis related changes in quality of life.
Completion of each 4 week home trial
Falls-Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: Completion of each 4 week home trial
16 item self administered questionnaire designed to assess fear of falling in mainly community dwelling older population.
Completion of each 4 week home trial
Orthotics and Prosthetics User Survey
Time Frame: Completion of each 4 week home trial
The OPUS is a self report questionnaire consisting of five modules. It can be used for prosthetic and orthotic programs for quality assessment, to maintain awareness of improvement in activities, to evaluate changes in patients functional status and quality of lie and to assess satisfaction with devices and services.
Completion of each 4 week home trial
World Health Organization Quality of Life Bref
Time Frame: Completion of each 4 week home trial
The WHOQOL-BREF comprises 26 items which measure the following domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment.
Completion of each 4 week home trial

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Levi Hargrove, PhD, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STU00209522
  • 2R01HD079428-05 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data will be made available

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available within 2 years of study completion

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data requests will be reviewed by the NU IRB and requester may need to sign a data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Amputation

Clinical Trials on Hybrid Leg

Subscribe