DAMP1: The 1T1T Concept Versus Conventional Implant Loading Protocol

August 5, 2019 updated by: Mainjot Amélie, University of Liege

DAMP1: The 1T1T Concept Versus Conventional Implant Loading Protocol: A Comparative Study

The One tooth - One time (1T1T) innovative approach is a straightforward and cost-effective protocol to replace a missing tooth in the posterior region (Lambert and Mainjot 2017) (see Appendix). The digital impression of single unit implants right after the implant placement and the direct manufacturing of a Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network (PICN) screw-retained crown allows the delivery of a final tooth in occlusion within the same day. The absence of lab procedures reduces the number of appointments, providing immediate results and high patient satisfaction. The prosthesis material choice is crucial in this procedure. Indeed, PICN high resilience, i.e. damping effect, could reduce peri-implant strain compared to ceramic materials (Magne, Silva et al. 2013) (Maminskas, Puisys et al. 2016), moreover its elastic modulus is close to tooth tissues, while other CAD-CAM composites value is too low and ceramic materials are too high. The rapid milling and manufacturing process, without any firing procedure, and the ease of adjustments (particularly to adjust proximal and occlusal contact points), make also PICNs well-adapted to chair-side systems. The material low stiffness and hardness can improve patient comfort and promote adaptation of the restorations to occlusal relationships with time. The 1T1T approach was presented as a proof of concept in a first international publication using tissue level implants from Straumann, which describes the whole protocol (Lambert and Mainjot 2017). Currently, a case series including 10 teeth is on-course, showing a 100% survival rate of implants and restorations after a 2-yr follow-up. These results are very promising but further clinical research is needed to validate such a protocol on a larger number of patients, on other implant systems as well as to compare this approach to conventional protocols.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The present study is designed as a single center comparative controlled trial. This study aims to compare immediate (1T1T) versus delayed loading with a final PICN screw-retained crown (DL-PICN), performed with CAD-CAM system. A total of 28 consecutive patients (56 teeth) above the age of 18 and presenting two single-unit edentulous space in the posterior region (molars or premolars, upper or lower jaw), will be considered for possible inclusion in the study, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria (patients with high occlusal stress will be included).

The performance of the different protocols will be tested in terms of (1) prostheses and implants survival and success rates following international standards (2) Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs); (3) time and cost. Moreover, restorations and antagonistic teeth wear will be studied trough ex-vivo analysis by profilometry of replica. The evaluations will be carried out at a follow-up period of 7 days, 2, 6 months and then every year up to 5 years.

Hypothesis is that the type of loading technique with a final PICN crown (1T1T or DL-PICN) does not influence prostheses and implants survival and success rates, but that 1T1T protocol improves patient-centered outcomes as well as time and cost effectiveness in comparison with DL-PICN.

The overall cost of the restoration treatment will be 1600€ (instead of 2100€), which represents a saving of 500€ for the patient.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Anoushka Davarpanah, DDS
  • Phone Number: +33 6 26 76 47 11

Study Locations

    • Choose A State
      • Liege, Choose A State, Belgium, 4020
        • Recruiting
        • Institute of Dentistry University of Liege
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject must have voluntarily signed the informed consent form before any study related action
  • Age : 18 or above
  • Men/Women
  • Patient in good systemic health (ASA I/ II)
  • No contraindication against oral surgical interventions
  • Full mouth plaque score (FMPI) lower or equal than 25%
  • Patient with two single unit edentulous space in the posterior area, upper or lower jaw, seeking for implant therapy
  • Maximum two missing teeth per quadrant
  • Two single unit edentulous spaces can be contiguous if there are three posterior teeth in occlusal contact in the tested half arch.
  • After the crown placement, at least 3 posterior teeth must be in occlusal contact with the antagonistic teeth in the tested half arch.
  • The tooth at the implant site must have been extracted or lost at least 12 weeks before the date of implantation.
  • At least 8 mm of bone in the vertical dimension
  • At least 6 mm of bone in the bucco-lingual dimension.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Autoimmune disease requiring medical treatment
  • Medical conditions requiring prolonged use of steroids
  • Use of Bisphosphonate intravenously or more then ˃ 3 years of oral use
  • Infection (local or systemic) - patient with gingivitis or active local infection will undergo a medical treatment prior to his entrance to the study, each individual will be evaluated prior to study procedure for suitability, in case of systemic infection the evaluation will be based on medical anamneses, and if necessary will be referred to relevant medical tests.
  • Current pregnancy or breastfeeding women
  • Alcoholism or chronically drug abuse
  • Immunocompromised patients
  • Uncontrolled Diabetes
  • Smokers (more than 10 cigarettes/day)
  • Prisoners
  • Conditions or circumstances, in the opinion of the investigator, which would prevent completion of study participation or interfere with analysis of study results, such as history of non-compliance, or unreliability.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: DAMP1 :
Single arm trial comparing a conventional technique with an experimental one, within the same patient.
Implant placement followed by either a conventional or a delayed loading of a PICN screw-retained crown.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prostheses survival/success rates following international standards
Time Frame: up to 5 years
up to 5 years
Implants survival/success rates following international standards
Time Frame: up to 5 years
up to 5 years
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs)
Time Frame: up to 5 years
Questionnaires will be used to assess outcome measure
up to 5 years
Time of protocols
Time Frame: up to 2 months
up to 2 months
Cost of protocols
Time Frame: up to 2 months
up to 2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 31, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Prosthesis Failure

Subscribe