Mandibular Furcation II Regeneration (FURC-II-REGEN)

November 27, 2023 updated by: Anders Verket, University of Oslo

Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and a Collagen Membrane or Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and Enamel Matrix Proteins, in the Regenerative Treatment of Furcation Grade II Defects

Teeth with furcation grade II defects will be treated with open flap debridement and regenerative therapy with biphasic calcium phosphate combined with either enamel matrix proteins or a collagen membrane.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Oslo, Norway, 0455
        • Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject must be ≥ 20 years
  • Subject must have periodontal disease as determined by the World Workshop 2017 criteria
  • Subjects must be undergoing periodontal treatment or follow-up and present 1 or more pair of bilateral mandibular molars affected by furcation involvement grade II with PPD >4 mm, and the furcation fornix must be below a tangential line from the distal to mesial interproximal crestal bone level
  • Competent to give consent

Exclusion Criteria:

The following must not be present at the time of enrolment;

  • Previous radiotherapy to the jaws, current use of chemotherapy, systemic long-term corticosteroid treatment
  • Present or past use of bisphosphonate treatment
  • Pregnant or nursing subjects
  • Patients classified as > class 2 according to the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status classification
  • Previous surgical therapy of included furcation defects
  • Inability to comprehend and respond to the quality of life questionnaire
  • Dental restorations or prosthesis involving the furcation area
  • Root fractures or suspected infractions
  • Caries lesions in the furcation area
  • No systemic antibiotic treatment within 3 months prior to intervention

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Regenerative therapy w/BCP and collagen membrane
In this arm, treatment of furcation grade II defects includes open flap debridement and regenerative therapy with biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) and collagen membrane.
Regenerative therapy with biphasic calcium phosphate + collagen membrane.
Regenerative therapy with biphasic calcium phosphate + enamel matrix proteins.
Active Comparator: Regenerative therapy w/BCP and enamel matrix proteins
In this arm, treatment of furcation grade II defects includes open flap debridement and regenerative therapy with biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) and enamel matrix proteins.
Regenerative therapy with biphasic calcium phosphate + collagen membrane.
Regenerative therapy with biphasic calcium phosphate + enamel matrix proteins.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of furcation grade level
Time Frame: 12 months after treatment
Proportion of sites demonstrating improvement in furcation grade level as measured with Nabers probe
12 months after treatment
Change of furcation grade level
Time Frame: 24 months after treatment
Proportion of sites demonstrating improvement in furcation grade level as measured with Nabers probe
24 months after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in patient-reported quality of life (QoL)
Time Frame: Preoperatively compared to 24 months after treatment

To assess QoL changes related to mouth and teeth prior to therapy to after therapy by the use of "The Oral Impacts on Daily Performance (OIDP)" instrument. Each question is assessed by a 5-point scale; (1) never affected, (2) less than once a month, (3) once or twice a month, (4) once or twice a week; and (5) every or nearly every day. The higher number represents more severe impact on quality of life; e.g. worse outcome.

Each item will be dichotomised yielding the categories (A) affected; including scale categories (2)-(5), and (B) unaffected, including category (1).

Preoperatively compared to 24 months after treatment
Changes in patient-reported quality of life (QoL)
Time Frame: Preoperatively compared to 12 months after treatment

To assess QoL changes related to mouth and teeth prior to therapy to after therapy by the use of "The Oral Impacts on Daily Performance (OIDP)" instrument. Each question is assessed by a 5-point scale; (1) never affected, (2) less than once a month, (3) once or twice a month, (4) once or twice a week; and (5) every or nearly every day. The higher number represents more severe impact on quality of life; e.g. worse outcome.

Each item will be dichotomised yielding the categories (A) affected; including scale categories (2)-(5), and (B) unaffected, including category (1).

Preoperatively compared to 12 months after treatment
Changes in defect morphology assessed by CBCT
Time Frame: 24 months after treatment
Cone beam computed tomography will be acquired at baseline, 2 weeks postoperatively and 24 months postoperatively. This outcome measures quantitative morphologic changes in the furcation defects at 24 months
24 months after treatment
Changes in CAL
Time Frame: 12 months after treatment
Changes in clinical attachment level will be measured with a probe in mm
12 months after treatment
Changes in CAL
Time Frame: 24 months after treatment
Changes in clinical attachment level will be measured with a probe in mm
24 months after treatment
Changes in PPD
Time Frame: 12 months after treatment
Changes in pocket probing depth will be measured with a probe in mm
12 months after treatment
Changes in PPD
Time Frame: 24 months after treatment
Changes in pocket probing depth will be measured with a probe in mm
24 months after treatment
Radiographic changes
Time Frame: 12 months after treatment
Standardized intraoral bitewing radiographs will be obtained and compared to baseline radiographs
12 months after treatment
Radiographic changes
Time Frame: 24 months after treatment
Standardized intraoral bitewing radiographs will be obtained and compared to baseline radiographs
24 months after treatment
Pain following surgery
Time Frame: Daily for 1 week postoperatively
Pain sensation for one week posteoperatively will be recorded on a visual analog scale scale from 0-10. 0 is equivalent to no pain, whereas 10 is the highest pain imagineable.
Daily for 1 week postoperatively
Caries assessment
Time Frame: 12 months
Caries in furcation defect assessed with an explorer will be recorded as (Y/N)
12 months
Caries assessment
Time Frame: 24 months
Caries in furcation defect assessed with an explorer will be recorded as (Y/N)
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 27, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 27, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Periodontal Diseases

Clinical Trials on Biphasic calcium phosphate (Straumann Bone Ceramic) + collagen membrane (Straumann Jason Membrane)

3
Subscribe