Endovascular Denervation Improves Limb Ischemia in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease

May 13, 2024 updated by: Gao-jun Teng, Zhongda Hospital

Endovascular Denervation Improves Limb Ischemia in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease (ED-PAD)

Sympathetic overactivity partly promotes the development of peripheral artery disease which mainly leads to ischemia of the lower limbs. Endovascular arterial denervation (ED) is a minimally invasive technique which could deliver Radiofrequency energy by a multi-electrode catheter to the Lower limb artery to restore Sympathetic activity. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of multi-electrode radiofrequency ablation system on lower limb ischemia with PAD.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Peripheral arterial disease(PAD) show insufficient blood supply of diseased limbs, which causes intermittent claudication of lower limbs, reduced skin temperature, pain, and chronic progressive disease that still produces ulcer or necrosis. Some clinical studies have shown Sympathetic overactivity in the lower arterial ischemic disease. The multi-electrode radiofrequency ablation system can significantly reduce the excitability of sympathetic nerve, restore the normal response of sympathetic nerve, relieve the pain and discomfort of patients, effectively improve the symptoms of lower limb ischemia, and improve the quality of life of patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210009
        • Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. eligible subjects aged 18-75 years,
  2. clinically confirmed PAD in the lower extremities,
  3. Rutherford category II-VI.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. thrombolytic therapy performed within 30 days,
  2. patients who had undergone vascular bypass surgery before this study,
  3. allergy or contraindication of antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulants, thrombolytic drugs and contrast agents,
  4. patients with obvious bleeding tendency, coagulation dysfunction, hypercoagulability and blood system diseases,
  5. serious liver and kidney diseases,
  6. history of hemorrhagic stroke within last month or ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack within 2 weeks,
  7. pacemaker implants,
  8. patients who are pregnant, breast-feeding or planning pregnancy,
  9. expected survival < 24 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: The control group
Treating with balloon dilation or stent implantation only,
Treating with balloon dilation or stent implantation which were Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)
Experimental: The EDN group
Treating with (Endovascular Denervation) EDN at the site of the iliac artery distal to the superficial femoral artery proximal before balloon dilation or stent implantation.
Treating with balloon dilation or stent implantation which were Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)
Treating with endovascular denervation (EDN) at the site of the iliac artery distal to the superficial femoral artery proximal before balloon dilation or stent implantation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) at 6-month Post-procedure.
Time Frame: From baseline to 6 months post procedure

The change value was using the ankle brachial index (ABI) at 6-month post-procedure minus the baseline ABI in two group. (the group which have higher change value mean the better result).

"Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) is the ratio of the blood pressure in the lower legs to the blood pressure in the arms. The normal range for the ankle-brachial index is between 0.90 and 1.30. An index of 0.41 to 0.90 indicates mild to moderate arterial disease and an index of 0.40 and lower indicates severe disease.

From baseline to 6 months post procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) at 3-month Post-procedure.
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months post procedure
The change value was using the ankle brachial index (ABI) at 3-month post-procedure minus the baseline ABI in two group. (the group which have higher change value mean the better result) "Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) is the ratio of the blood pressure in the lower legs to the blood pressure in the arms. The normal range for the ankle-brachial index is between 0.90 and 1.30. An index of 0.41 to 0.90 indicates mild to moderate arterial disease and an index of 0.40 and lower indicates severe disease.
From baseline to 3 months post procedure
Change of Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) at 1-week Post-procedure.
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 week post procedure
The change value was using the ankle brachial index (ABI) at 1-week post-procedure minus the baseline ABI in two group. (the group which have higher change value mean the better result) "Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) is the ratio of the blood pressure in the lower legs to the blood pressure in the arms. The normal range for the ankle-brachial index is between 0.90 and 1.30. An index of 0.41 to 0.90 indicates mild to moderate arterial disease and an index of 0.40 and lower indicates severe disease.
From baseline to 1 week post procedure
Change of Transcutaneous Oxygen Pressure (TcPO2)
Time Frame: From baseline to 6 months post procedure
Use the Transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2) at 6-month post-procedure minus the baseline TcPO2.(the higher the value, the better the results)
From baseline to 6 months post procedure
Change of Transcutaneous Oxygen Pressure (TcPO2)
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months post procedure
Use the Transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2) at 3-month post-procedure minus the baseline TcPO2.(the higher the value, the better the results)
From baseline to 3 months post procedure
Change of Transcutaneous Oxygen Pressure (TcPO2)
Time Frame: From baseline to 1 week post procedure
Use the Transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2) at 1 week post-procedure minus the baseline TcPO2.(the higher the value, the better the results)
From baseline to 1 week post procedure
Rutherford Category
Time Frame: At 6 months post procedure
Number of Subjects with a decrease in Rutherford Category in 6 months (Rutherford category includes a total of 0-6 grades, grade 0 was asymptomatic, grade 1 was mild intermittent claudication, grade 2 was moderate intermittent claudication, grade 3 was severe intermittent claudication, grade 4 was resting pain, grade 5 was minor tissue defect, grade 6 was tissue ulcer, gangrene. The lower the grade, the better the results)
At 6 months post procedure
Rutherford Category
Time Frame: At 3 months post procedure
Number of Subjects with a decrease in Rutherford Category in 3 months (Rutherford category includes a total of 0-6 grades, grade 0 was asymptomatic, grade 1 was mild intermittent claudication, grade 2 was moderate intermittent claudication, grade 3 was severe intermittent claudication, grade 4 was resting pain, grade 5 was minor tissue defect, grade 6 was tissue ulcer, gangrene. The lower the grade, the better the results)
At 3 months post procedure
Rutherford Category
Time Frame: At 1 week post procedure
Number of Subjects with a decrease in Rutherford Category in 1 week (Rutherford category includes a total of 0-6 grades, grade 0 was asymptomatic, grade 1 was mild intermittent claudication, grade 2 was moderate intermittent claudication, grade 3 was severe intermittent claudication, grade 4 was resting pain, grade 5 was minor tissue defect, grade 6 was tissue ulcer, gangrene. The lower the grade, the better the results)
At 1 week post procedure
NRS Score
Time Frame: At 6 months post procedure
Median of numeric rating scale (NRS) scores in 6 months (NRS scores includes a total of 0-10 grades, No pain (0), Mild pain (1 ~ 3), Moderate pain (4 ~ 6), Severe pain (7 ~ 10), the lower the grade, the better the results)
At 6 months post procedure
NRS Score
Time Frame: At 3 months post procedure
Median of numeric rating scale (NRS) scores in 3 months (NRS scores includes a total of 0-10 grades, No pain (0), Mild pain (1 ~ 3), Moderate pain (4 ~ 6), Severe pain (7 ~ 10), the lower the grade, the better the results)
At 3 months post procedure
NRS Score
Time Frame: At 1 week post procedure
Median of numeric rating scale (NRS) scores in 1 week (NRS scores includes a total of 0-10 grades, No pain (0), Mild pain (1 ~ 3), Moderate pain (4 ~ 6), Severe pain (7 ~ 10), the lower the grade, the better the results)
At 1 week post procedure
Number of Participants With MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events) and MALE (Major Adverse Limb Events)
Time Frame: From baseline to 6 months
MACE (Major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as cerebrovascular accident, myocardial infarction, or death.) and MALE (Major adverse limb events, defined as untreated loss of patency of the revascularization, reintervention on the revascularized segment, or major amputation of the revascularized limb) occurred cases from baseline to 6 months.
From baseline to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gao-Jun Teng, MD, Zhongda Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 23, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on PAD

Clinical Trials on PTA

Subscribe