The AMPK Modulator Metformin as a Novel Adjunct to Conventional Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

July 9, 2025 updated by: Mahmoud Samy Abdallah, Sadat City University

The AMPK Modulator Metformin as a Novel Adjunct to Conventional Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Proof-of-Concept, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Metformin, a traditional antidiabetic medication, exerts glucose lowering effects by activating AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), a critical enzyme involved in the lipid and glucose metabolism. In addition to the antidiabetic effect, metformin has been shown to inhibit Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Inflammation (LPS)-induced inflammation by suppress NF-κB production, which is also regulated by AMPK. These regulatory effects of AMPK on the inflammation, immune and fibroblast-like synovial cells have prompted the investigation on the effects of metformin on rheumatoid arthritis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, multisystem inflammatory disorder of unknown etiology. It is characterized by polyarthritis and systemic inflammation. The inflammation in the hyperplastic synovium can destruct the structure of affected joints. Although the exact molecular mechanism underlying the pathogenesis of RA remains unknown, it is suggested that T helper cell (Th) 17 plays a central role. Interleukin (IL)-17, mostly secreted by Th17, has synergistic effects with tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-α), IL-1β and IL-6 in cases of RA. Metformin, a traditional antidiabetic medication, exerts glucose lowering effects by activating AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), a critical enzyme involved in the lipid and glucose metabolism. In addition to the antidiabetic effect, metformin has been shown to inhibit Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Inflammation (LPS)-induced inflammation by suppress NF-κB production, which is also regulated by AMPK . In addition, metformin activated AMPK may inhibit mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), which then regulate the differentiation of T cells in vitro and in vivo. In particular, AMPK has been reported to be associated with the inhibition of TH17 cells through suppressing the phosphorylation of mTOR and its downstream signal transducers, suggesting the therapeutic potential of AMPK agonists. Besides the imbalance between Th17 cells and Treg cells is responsible for the chronic inflammation in RA, synovium hyperplasia also plays a central role in the joint destruction. It has been reported that rapamycin, an inhibitor of mTOR, is able to significantly reduce fibroblastlike synovial cell invasion in RA via suppressing mTOR signaling pathway. These regulatory effects of AMPK on the inflammation, immune and fibroblast-like synovial cells have prompted the investigation on the effects of metformin on rheumatoid arthritis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Menoufia
      • Shibīn Al Kawm, Menoufia, Egypt, 13829
        • Faculty of pharmacy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with active rheumatoid arthritis based on DAS28 score. Patients received the standard therapy (i.e. one or more conventional DMARDs) for at least three months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known hypersensitivity to metformin.
  • Patients who have a prior diagnosis with diabetes mellitus.
  • Patients receive metformin for any other indications.
  • Patients with congestive heart failure.
  • Patients with a history of myocardial infarction.
  • Patients with severe anemia.
  • Patients with active infections or other inflammatory diseases.
  • Patients receiving biological therapy.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Patients with impaired liver functions.
  • Patients with impaired kidney functions (serum creatinine concentrations ≥1.5 and ≥1.4 mg/dL in males and females respectively).
  • Patients with malignancies.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Control group
patients will receive the standard therapy (methotrexate) plus placebo tablets
Placebo tablet plus plus Methotrexate 7.5 mg weekly
Experimental: Metformin group
patients will receive the standard therapy plus 1 g metformin daily.
1000 mg of Metformin table taken orally daily plus Methotrexate 7.5 mg weekly

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ACR 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) response rate
Time Frame: week 12
based on tender and swollen joint counts, patient's assessment of pain, patient and physician global assessment of arthritis, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI), and CRP level
week 12
ACR50 & ACR70 response rate
Time Frame: week 12
based on tender and swollen joint counts, patient's assessment of pain, patient and physician global assessment of arthritis, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI), and CRP level
week 12
Disease activity scale in 28 joints (DAS-28)
Time Frame: week 12
Scale assessing severity of rheumatoid arthritis based on number of tender, swollen joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels, and patient self-assessment of his condition (global health assessment). Whereas "28" describes the number of different joints including in the measurement: proximal interphalangeal joints (10 joints), metacarpophalangeal joints (10), wrists (2), elbows (2), shoulders (2), knees (2).
week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
TNF-α
Time Frame: at baseline and at week 12
Serum level Tumor necrosis factor- alpha (TNF-α)
at baseline and at week 12
CRP
Time Frame: at baseline and at week 12
Serum level of C-reactive protein (CRP)
at baseline and at week 12
the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey
Time Frame: week 12
both the physical component score [PCS] and the mental component score [MCS])
week 12
HAQ-DI (Health Assessment Score- Disability index)
Time Frame: week 12
HAQ-DI (Health Assessment Score- Disability index), in which patients are asked to rate their capacity to perform 20 activities of daily living (ADL). Scoring within each section is from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). For each section the score given to that section is the worst score within the section
week 12
AMPK expression
Time Frame: at baseline and at week 12
AMPK expression in synovium or serum
at baseline and at week 12
IGF-IR expression
Time Frame: at baseline and at week 12
IGF-IR expression in Blood
at baseline and at week 12
TGF-Beta1
Time Frame: at baseline and at week 12
Serum level tissue growth factor beta 1
at baseline and at week 12
Inteleukins
Time Frame: at baseline and at week 12
Serum levels of Interleukins (IL) IL-17, IL-1β , IL-6 & IL-10
at baseline and at week 12
Drug Adverse effects
Time Frame: 3 months
Adverse effect incidence: adverse effect will be reported by patients or their caregivers and recorded by investigator.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 14, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe