The MOMENTUM Study: The Multiple Outcome Evaluation of Radiation Therapy Using the MR-Linac Study (MOMENTUM)

September 25, 2023 updated by: Helena M Verkooijen, UMC Utrecht

The Multiple Outcome Evaluation of Radiation Therapy Using the MR-Linac Study

The Multi-OutcoMe EvaluatioN of radiation Therapy Using the Unity MR-Linac Study (MOMENTUM) is a multi-institutional, international registry facilitating evidenced based implementation of the Unity MR-Linac technology and further technical development of the MR-Linac system with the ultimate purpose to improve patients' survival, local, and regional tumor control and quality of life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale: Radiation therapy has become indispensable in cancer treatment. However, it is associated with severe side effects. Innovation in radiation therapy has resulted in the development of MR-guided radiation therapy (MRGRT) which allows high precision radiotherapy under real time MR visualization. High precision MRGRT has the potential of dose escalation and margin reduction and may potentially lead to higher cure rates and less toxicity. MRGRT can be delivered by the MRI guided Linear Accelerator (MR-Linac) which integrates a state-of-the-art linear accelerator, 1.5T diagnostic quality MRI and an online adaptive workflow.

Objective: The Multi-OutcoMe EvaluatioN of radiation Therapy Using the MR-Linac Study (MOMENTUM) aims to accelerate the technical and clinical development of Anatomic and Biologic MRGRT and facilitate the evidence-based introduction of the MR-Linac into clinical practice. In MOMENTUM, technical and clinical data are gathered in order to optimize software, evaluate treatment outcomes, toxicities and progression free, disease free, and overall survival per disease site, and create a repository of anatomical and biological MR sequences to develop new features.

Study design: A multi-institutional, international observational cohort study. Study population: Cancer patients ≥ 18 years receiving treatment and/or imaging on an MR-Linac machine are eligible for enrollment.

Main study parameters/endpoints: MOMENTUM will collect technical and clinical patient data. The technical patient data is defined as data generated by (the use of) the MR-Linac and will include data collection during scans performed during routine care as well as research MRIs. Clinical data will be categorized into six classes: demographic, disease characteristics, treatment classifiers, toxicity outcomes, cancer control outcomes and PROs.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

8000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Melbourne, Australia
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Austin Health - Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre
        • Contact:
          • Sweet Ping
      • Brussel, Belgium
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Insitut Jules Bordet
        • Contact:
          • Robbe van den Begin
      • Toronto, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • University Health Network - Princess Margaret Cancer Center
        • Contact:
          • Michael Velec
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre/Odette Cancer Centre
        • Contact:
          • Arjun Sahgal
    • Funen
      • Odense, Funen, Denmark, 5000
      • Tübingen, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
        • Contact:
          • Cihan Gani
      • Brescia, Italy
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Università degli Studi di Brescia
        • Contact:
          • Stefano Magrini
      • Negrar, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria
        • Contact:
          • Filippo Alongi
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Marlies N Nowee
      • Deventer, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • Radiotherapiegroep
        • Contact:
          • Paul Jeene
      • Leeuwarden, Netherlands
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Radiotherapeutisch Instituut Friesland (RIF)
        • Contact:
          • Peter de Boer
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • Radboud UMC
        • Contact:
          • Linda Kerkmeijer
      • Utrecht, Netherlands, 3508GA
        • Recruiting
        • University Medical Center Utrecht
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Tessa Leer
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Helena M Verkooijen, Prof, Dr
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • The Royal Marsden and The Institute of Cancer Research National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre
        • Contact:
          • Shaista Hafeez
      • Manchester, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • The Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust
        • Contact:
          • Ananya Choudhury
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15212
        • Recruiting
        • Allegheny Health Network
        • Contact:
          • Tom Colonias
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • MD Anderson Cancer Center
        • Contact:
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
        • Recruiting
        • Medical College of Wisconsin
        • Contact:
          • William A Hall

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients receiving treatment and/or imaging on an MR-Linac machine are eligible for enrolment. Patients must meet eligibility criteria and provide informed consent to be enrolled.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is to undergo or has completed imaging or treatment procedures on an MR-Linac;
  • Patient provides written, informed consent;
  • Patient is 18 years old or older.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • MRI exclusion criteria, including
  • MRI contraindications as per usual clinical care, such as (possible) pregnancy; claustrophobia and metal or electronic implants not compatible with MRI.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Lung cancer
Radiation therapy on the CE marked and FDA approved MR-Linac
Brain cancer
Radiation therapy on the CE marked and FDA approved MR-Linac
Esophageal cancer
Radiation therapy on the CE marked and FDA approved MR-Linac
Breast Cancer
Radiation therapy on the CE marked and FDA approved MR-Linac
Head and Neck Cancer
Radiation therapy on the CE marked and FDA approved MR-Linac
Pancreatic cancer
Radiation therapy on the CE marked and FDA approved MR-Linac
Gynecological cancer
Radiation therapy on the CE marked and FDA approved MR-Linac
Rectal cancer
Radiation therapy on the CE marked and FDA approved MR-Linac
Prostate cancer
Radiation therapy on the CE marked and FDA approved MR-Linac
Bladder cancer
Radiation therapy on the CE marked and FDA approved MR-Linac
Oligometastases
Radiation therapy on the CE marked and FDA approved MR-Linac
Liver cancer
Radiation therapy on the CE marked and FDA approved MR-Linac
Other types of cancer
Radiation therapy on the CE marked and FDA approved MR-Linac

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free Survival
Time Frame: 3 months after MR-Linac treatment
Progression free survival of participating patients will be obtained from the hospital information systems. Patient follow-up is conducted to local standard of care practices.
3 months after MR-Linac treatment
Progression-free Survival
Time Frame: 6 months after MR-Linac treatment
Progression free survival of participating patients will be obtained from the hospital information systems. Patient follow-up is conducted to local standard of care practices.
6 months after MR-Linac treatment
Progression-free Survival
Time Frame: 24 months after MR-Linac treatment
Progression free survival of participating patients will be obtained from the hospital information systems. Patient follow-up is conducted to local standard of care practices.
24 months after MR-Linac treatment
Survival
Time Frame: 3 months after MR-Linac treatment
Overall survival of participating patients will be obtained from the hospital information systems. Patient follow-up is conducted to local standard of care practices.
3 months after MR-Linac treatment
Survival
Time Frame: 6 months after MR-Linac treatment
Overall survival of participating patients will be obtained from the hospital information systems. Patient follow-up is conducted to local standard of care practices.
6 months after MR-Linac treatment
Survival
Time Frame: 24 months after MR-Linac treatment
Overall survival of participating patients will be obtained from the hospital information systems. Patient follow-up is conducted to local standard of care practices.
24 months after MR-Linac treatment
Disease-free Survival
Time Frame: 3 months after MR-Linac treatment
Disease-free survival of participating patients will be obtained from the hospital information systems. Patient follow-up is conducted to local standard of care practices.
3 months after MR-Linac treatment
Disease-free Survival
Time Frame: 6 months after MR-Linac treatment
Disease-free survival of participating patients will be obtained from the hospital information systems. Patient follow-up is conducted to local standard of care practices.
6 months after MR-Linac treatment
Disease-free Survival
Time Frame: 24 months after MR-Linac treatment
Disease-free survival of participating patients will be obtained from the hospital information systems. Patient follow-up is conducted to local standard of care practices.
24 months after MR-Linac treatment
Patient reported Health related quality of life (HRQoL).
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment.
Patient reported health related quality of life is captured through a questionnaire the Generic European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30. They include 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social), three symptom scales, a global health scale, and six single items. All of these scales and items measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high score on functional or global health status scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for a symptom scale represents a high level of symptomatology.
3 months after treatment.
Patient reported Health related quality of life (HRQoL).
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment.
Patient reported health related quality of life is captured through a questionnaire the Generic European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30. They include 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social), three symptom scales, a global health scale, and six single items. All of these scales and items measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high score on functional or global health status scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for a symptom scale represents a high level of symptomatology.
6 months after treatment.
Patient reported Health related quality of life (HRQoL).
Time Frame: 12 months after treatment.
Patient reported health related quality of life is captured through a questionnaire the Generic European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30. They include 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social), three symptom scales, a global health scale, and six single items. All of these scales and items measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high score on functional or global health status scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for a symptom scale represents a high level of symptomatology.
12 months after treatment.
Patient reported Health related quality of life (HRQoL).
Time Frame: 24 months after treatment.
Patient reported health related quality of life is captured through a questionnaire the Generic European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30. They include 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social), three symptom scales, a global health scale, and six single items. All of these scales and items measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high score on functional or global health status scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for a symptom scale represents a high level of symptomatology.
24 months after treatment.
Patient reported Health related quality of life (HRQoL).
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment.
Generic patient reported quality of life is captured by The EuroQol (EQ)-5D-5L questionnaire. This includes a descriptive system questionnaire and visual analogue scale (VAS). The descriptive system scores five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) from 1 to 5 where 1 means having no problems, and 5 means extreme problems or unable to participate. The digits can be combined in a 5-digit code to describe the overall health status. For example, 12111. The VAS records the overall current health on a vertical visual analogue scale from 0 to 100, respectively 'the worst health you can imagine' to 'the best health you can imagine'.
3 months after treatment.
Patient reported Health related quality of life (HRQoL).
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment.
Generic patient reported quality of life is captured by The EuroQol (EQ)-5D-5L questionnaire. This includes a descriptive system questionnaire and visual analogue scale (VAS). The descriptive system scores five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) from 1 to 5 where 1 means having no problems, and 5 means extreme problems or unable to participate. The digits can be combined in a 5-digit code to describe the overall health status. For example, 12111. The VAS records the overall current health on a vertical visual analogue scale from 0 to 100, respectively 'the worst health you can imagine' to 'the best health you can imagine'.
6 months after treatment.
Patient reported Health related quality of life (HRQoL).
Time Frame: 12 months after treatment.
Generic patient reported quality of life is captured by The EuroQol (EQ)-5D-5L questionnaire. This includes a descriptive system questionnaire and visual analogue scale (VAS). The descriptive system scores five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) from 1 to 5 where 1 means having no problems, and 5 means extreme problems or unable to participate. The digits can be combined in a 5-digit code to describe the overall health status. For example, 12111. The VAS records the overall current health on a vertical visual analogue scale from 0 to 100, respectively 'the worst health you can imagine' to 'the best health you can imagine'.
12 months after treatment.
Patient reported Health related quality of life (HRQoL).
Time Frame: 24 months after treatment.
Generic patient reported quality of life is captured by The EuroQol (EQ)-5D-5L questionnaire. This includes a descriptive system questionnaire and visual analogue scale (VAS). The descriptive system scores five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) from 1 to 5 where 1 means having no problems, and 5 means extreme problems or unable to participate. The digits can be combined in a 5-digit code to describe the overall health status. For example, 12111. The VAS records the overall current health on a vertical visual analogue scale from 0 to 100, respectively 'the worst health you can imagine' to 'the best health you can imagine'.
24 months after treatment.
Patient reported tumor specific quality of life (QoL).
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment.
Disease-specific patient reported quality of life is captured by a tumor specific EORTC QLQ questionnaire. (Brain-BN20, Breast-BR23, Bladder-BLM30, colorectal-CR29, Gynecological-CX24&VU34, Head and Neck-HN35, liver-HCC18 (primary) and -LMC21 (metastasis), lung-LC13, esophageal-OES18, prostate-PR2, pancreas-PAN26). They all include a different set of functional scales and symptom scales. All of these scales and items measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high score on functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for a symptom scale represents a high level of symptomatology.
3 months after treatment.
Patient reported tumor specific quality of life (QoL).
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment.
Disease-specific patient reported quality of life is captured by a tumor specific EORTC QLQ questionnaire. (Brain-BN20, Breast-BR23, Bladder-BLM30, colorectal-CR29, Gynecological-CX24&VU34, Head and Neck-HN35, liver-HCC18 (primary) and -LMC21 (metastasis), lung-LC13, esophageal-OES18, prostate-PR2, pancreas-PAN26). They all include a different set of functional scales and symptom scales. All of these scales and items measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high score on functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for a symptom scale represents a high level of symptomatology.
6 months after treatment.
Patient reported tumor specific quality of life (QoL).
Time Frame: 12 months after treatment.
Disease-specific patient reported quality of life is captured by a tumor specific EORTC QLQ questionnaire. (Brain-BN20, Breast-BR23, Bladder-BLM30, colorectal-CR29, Gynecological-CX24&VU34, Head and Neck-HN35, liver-HCC18 (primary) and -LMC21 (metastasis), lung-LC13, esophageal-OES18, prostate-PR2, pancreas-PAN26). They all include a different set of functional scales and symptom scales. All of these scales and items measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high score on functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for a symptom scale represents a high level of symptomatology.
12 months after treatment.
Patient reported tumor specific quality of life (QoL).
Time Frame: 24 months after treatment.
Disease-specific patient reported quality of life is captured by a tumor specific EORTC QLQ questionnaire. (Brain-BN20, Breast-BR23, Bladder-BLM30, colorectal-CR29, Gynecological-CX24&VU34, Head and Neck-HN35, liver-HCC18 (primary) and -LMC21 (metastasis), lung-LC13, esophageal-OES18, prostate-PR2, pancreas-PAN26). They all include a different set of functional scales and symptom scales. All of these scales and items measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high score on functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for a symptom scale represents a high level of symptomatology.
24 months after treatment.
Acute toxicity in common toxicity criteria for adverse events (CTCAE).
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment.
Disease-specific toxicity is obtained from the hospital information system. Toxicities are reported according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) dictionary.
3 months after treatment.
Acute toxicity in common toxicity criteria for adverse events (CTCAE).
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment.
Disease-specific toxicity is obtained from the hospital information system. Toxicities are reported according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) dictionary.
6 months after treatment.
Acute toxicity in common toxicity criteria for adverse events (CTCAE).
Time Frame: 12 months after treatment.
Disease-specific toxicity is obtained from the hospital information system. Toxicities are reported according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) dictionary.
12 months after treatment.
Acute toxicity in common toxicity criteria for adverse events (CTCAE).
Time Frame: 24 months after treatment.
Disease-specific toxicity is obtained from the hospital information system. Toxicities are reported according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) dictionary.
24 months after treatment.
Clinical tumor response.
Time Frame: 2 year follow up.
Clinical tumor response in participating patients is obtained from hospital information systems. Clinical patient follow-up and re-staging procedures are conducted to local standard of care practices.
2 year follow up.
Pathological tumor response.
Time Frame: 2 year follow up.
Pathological tumor response in participating patients who undergo surgery are obtained from hospital information systems. Clinical patient follow-up and re-staging procedures are conducted to local standard of care practices.
2 year follow up.
Toxicity in common toxicity criteria for adverse events (CTCAE).
Time Frame: 2 years
Disease-specific toxicity is obtained from the hospital information system.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Radiation therapy

3
Subscribe