- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04081636
Prostate Biopsy, Transrectal vs. Transperineal: Efficacy and Complications (ProBE-PC)
Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Transperineal and Transrectal Prostate Biopsy Efficacy and Complications (ProBE-PC Trial)
This study evaluates the difference between 2 prostate biopsy methods, transrectal (through the rectal wall) and transperineal (through the skin) needle biopsy.
Men who are in need of prostate biopsy due to clinical suspicions of prostate cancer will be randomly assigned (1:1) to either transrectal or transperineal approach.
This research study will scientifically determine if one biopsy method is better than the other in reducing complications and improving cancer detection.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
There are two ways to take biopsy (tissue) samples from the prostate. The more commonly used method is trans-rectal needle biopsy of the prostate (TR-Bx) with a needle inserted through a probe in the rectum to reach the prostate.
TR-Bx is usually performed in the office, using local anesthesia, and often using a targeted biopsy approach using MRI/ultrasound fusion technique.
Trans-perineal biopsy (TP-Bx) with a needle inserted directly through the skin to reach the prostate.
Typically, TP-BX is performed in the outpatient surgical setting due significant pain associated with the procedure, requiring the use anesthesia and/or sedation.
TP-Bx. procedure is very uncommon in the USA and is often performed using ultrasound alone (less accurate), without the benefit of MRI guided targeted biopsy.
Now, with the availability of new devices, we are able to perform both TR-Bx and TP-Bx using MRI/ultrasound fusion guided targeted approach, in the office setting, using local anesthesia alone.
With the TR-Bx, there has been increasing risk of infection related complications, sepsis and hospital admissions.
The newer approach of biopsy TP-Bx may cause fewer infections and may have a higher accuracy of finding cancer.
Using validated questionnaires such as IIEF-6, IPSS and TRUS-BxQ, this randomized study of TR-BX and TP-Bx will address these questions:
- Differences in the risk of infectious complications
- Differences in the overall cancer detection rate and the high-grade cancer detection rate
- Differences in the hemorrhagic and urinary side effects
- Tolerability of both techniques with local anesthesia alone
- Difference in the results of of MRI/US fusion targeted biopsy
- Differences in the cost of the procedures
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Brenda Romeo, CCRC
- Phone Number: 518-262-8579
- Email: amcurologyresearch@amc.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Badar M Mian
- Email: mianb@amc.edu
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
Albany, New York, United States, 12208
- Recruiting
- Albany Medical College
-
Contact:
- Brenda Romeo, CCRC
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Hugh fisher, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Ashar Ata, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients who are scheduled to undergo prostate biopsy for suspected prostate cancer as part of their regular medical care
- Either with or without an MRI
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with no access to rectum (due to previous rectal surgery)
- Any abnormalities of the perineal skin (e.g. infection)
- Patients whose procedure requires sedation or general anesthesia
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Systematic Transrectal biopsy (TR-Bx)
Ultrasound guided; needle inserted through the rectum to reach the prostate
|
Through the rectum
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Targeted Transrectal biopsy (TR-Bx)
MRI-guided; needle inserted through the rectum to reach the prostate
|
Through the rectum
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Systematic Transperineal biopsy (TP-Bx)
Ultrasound guided; needle inserted directly through the skin to reach the prostate
|
Through the perineal skin
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Targeted Transperineal biopsy (TP-Bx)
MRI-guided; needle inserted directly through the skin to reach the prostate
|
Through the perineal skin
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Rate of infectious complications
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Whether or not patient had an infection after the biopsy
|
30 days
|
Clinically significant cancer detection rate
Time Frame: 14 days
|
The rate of grade group 2 prostate cancer detected in each study arm
|
14 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Rate of Bleeding complications
Time Frame: 30 days
|
The type of bleeding and its severity (blood in urine or stool)
|
30 days
|
Tolerability under local anesthesia
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Pain scores; Need for additional analgesia
|
30 days
|
Patient reported urinary function measures using IPSS questionaire
Time Frame: 30 days
|
International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) to measure urinary function
|
30 days
|
Cost of the procedures
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Differences in the actual cost of the procedures (including supplies, time)
|
30 days
|
Patient reported sexual function measures using IIEF questionaire
Time Frame: 30 days
|
International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) to measure sexual dysfunction
|
30 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Badar M Mian, MD, Albany Medical College
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Meyer AR, Joice GA, Schwen ZR, Partin AW, Allaf ME, Gorin MA. Initial Experience Performing In-office Ultrasound-guided Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Under Local Anesthesia Using the PrecisionPoint Transperineal Access System. Urology. 2018 May;115:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
- Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, Panebianco V, Mynderse LA, Vaarala MH, Briganti A, Budaus L, Hellawell G, Hindley RG, Roobol MJ, Eggener S, Ghei M, Villers A, Bladou F, Villeirs GM, Virdi J, Boxler S, Robert G, Singh PB, Venderink W, Hadaschik BA, Ruffion A, Hu JC, Margolis D, Crouzet S, Klotz L, Taneja SS, Pinto P, Gill I, Allen C, Giganti F, Freeman A, Morris S, Punwani S, Williams NR, Brew-Graves C, Deeks J, Takwoingi Y, Emberton M, Moore CM; PRECISION Study Group Collaborators. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
- Choi YH, Kang MY, Sung HH, Jeon HG, Chang Jeong B, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Kim CK, Park BK, Lee HM. Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Feb;17(1):e19-e25. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
- Moldovan PC, Van den Broeck T, Sylvester R, Marconi L, Bellmunt J, van den Bergh RCN, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, Fossati N, Gross T, Henry AM, Joniau S, van der Kwast TH, Matveev VB, van der Poel HG, De Santis M, Schoots IG, Wiegel T, Yuan CY, Cornford P, Mottet N, Lam TB, Rouviere O. What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):250-266. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.026. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
- Wu YP, Li XD, Ke ZB, Chen SH, Chen PZ, Wei Y, Huang JB, Sun XL, Xue XY, Zheng QS, Xu N. Risk factors for infectious complications following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Infect Drug Resist. 2018 Sep 17;11:1491-1497. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S171162. eCollection 2018.
- Borghesi M, Ahmed H, Nam R, Schaeffer E, Schiavina R, Taneja S, Weidner W, Loeb S. Complications After Systematic, Random, and Image-guided Prostate Biopsy. Eur Urol. 2017 Mar;71(3):353-365. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
- Liss MA, Ehdaie B, Loeb S, Meng MV, Raman JD, Spears V, Stroup SP. An Update of the American Urological Association White Paper on the Prevention and Treatment of the More Common Complications Related to Prostate Biopsy. J Urol. 2017 Aug;198(2):329-334. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.103. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
- Saade EA, Suwantarat N, Zabarsky TF, Wilson B, Donskey CJ. Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Escherichia coli Infections After Transrectal Biopsy of the Prostate in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System. Pathog Immun. 2016;1(2):243-257. doi: 10.20411/pai.v1i2.123.
- Xiang J, Yan H, Li J, Wang X, Chen H, Zheng X. Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb 13;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1573-0.
- Skouteris VM, Crawford ED, Mouraviev V, Arangua P, Metsinis MP, Skouteris M, Zacharopoulos G, Stone NN. Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Versus Transperineal Mapping Prostate Biopsy: Complication Comparison. Rev Urol. 2018;20(1):19-25. doi: 10.3909/riu0785.
- Roberts MJ, Bennett HY, Harris PN, Holmes M, Grummet J, Naber K, Wagenlehner FME. Prostate Biopsy-related Infection: A Systematic Review of Risk Factors, Prevention Strategies, and Management Approaches. Urology. 2017 Jun;104:11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.011. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
- Altok M, Kim B, Patel BB, Shih YT, Ward JF, McRae SE, Chapin BF, Pisters LL, Pettaway CA, Kim J, Demirel HC, Davis JW. Cost and efficacy comparison of five prostate biopsy modalities: a platform for integrating cost into novel-platform comparative research. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018 Nov;21(4):524-532. doi: 10.1038/s41391-018-0056-7. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
- Stefanova V, Buckley R, Flax S, Spevack L, Hajek D, Tunis A, Lai E, Loblaw A; Collaborators. Transperineal Prostate Biopsies Using Local Anesthesia: Experience with 1,287 Patients. Prostate Cancer Detection Rate, Complications and Patient Tolerability. J Urol. 2019 Jun;201(6):1121-1126. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000156.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 5479
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer
-
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteRecruitingObesity | Overweight | Cancer Survivor | Prostate Adenocarcinoma | Stage I Prostate Cancer | Stage II Prostate Cancer | Stage III Prostate Cancer | Stage IV Prostate Cancer | Stage IIA Prostate Cancer | Stage IIB Prostate Cancer | Stage IVA Prostate Cancer | Stage IVB Prostate Cancer | Stage A Prostate Cancer | Stage... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson...Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; Prostate Cancer FoundationWithdrawnStage III Prostate Cancer | Stage IV Prostate Cancer | Stage IVA Prostate Cancer | Stage IVB Prostate Cancer | Stage IIIA Prostate Cancer | Stage IIIB Prostate Cancer | Stage IIIC Prostate Cancer
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterProgenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.TerminatedRandomized Trial of PSMA PET Scan Before Definitive Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer (PSMA-dRT)Stage II Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIA Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage I Prostate...United States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI); SanofiTerminatedDiarrhea | Recurrent Prostate Cancer | Hormone-resistant Prostate Cancer | Stage I Prostate Cancer | Stage III Prostate Cancer | Stage IV Prostate Cancer | Stage IIA Prostate Cancer | Stage IIB Prostate CancerUnited States
-
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterRiverside Methodist HospitalCompletedStage I Prostate Cancer | Stage III Prostate Cancer | Stage IV Prostate Cancer | Stage IIA Prostate Cancer | Stage IIB Prostate CancerUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnStage I Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIA Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Prostate...United States
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedRecurrent Prostate Cancer | Stage I Prostate Cancer | Stage III Prostate Cancer | Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate | Stage IV Prostate Cancer | Stage IIA Prostate Cancer | Stage IIB Prostate CancerUnited States
-
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteGenentech, Inc.CompletedRecurrent Prostate Cancer | Stage I Prostate Cancer | Stage III Prostate Cancer | Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate | Stage IIA Prostate Cancer | Stage IIB Prostate CancerUnited States
-
Ryan Kohlbrenner, MDRadiological Society of North AmericaCompletedProstate Adenocarcinoma | Stage IV Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Prostate Carcinoma | Stage IIIA Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVA Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage...United States
-
University of California, IrvineCompletedRecurrent Prostate Cancer | Stage I Prostate Cancer | Stage III Prostate Cancer | Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate | Stage IIA Prostate Cancer | Stage IIB Prostate CancerUnited States
Clinical Trials on Systematic Transrectal biopsy (TR-Bx)
-
Heinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfGerman Cancer Research CenterUnknown
-
Rabin Medical CenterUnknown
-
Institut Mutualiste MontsourisUnknownProstate CancerFrance
-
TC Erciyes UniversityCompleted
-
InvestigatorUrologyIBSALInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de SalamancaUnknownEstablish the Efficacy Between the Four Schemes in Terms of the Aggressiveness of the Tumors According to the Gleason Classification | Establish the Efficacy Between the Four Schemes in Terms of Morbidity Associated With the Technique | Establish the Efficacy Between the Four Schemes... and other conditionsSpain
-
Centre Chirurgical Marie LannelongueCompleted
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceCompleted
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingHealthy | Prostate Cancer | Conditions Influencing Health StatusUnited States
-
The University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonCompletedProstate Cancer | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Target Lesion | Fusion Biopsy | Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer | TransperinealUnited States