A Study to Test the Long-term Safety of BI 655130 in Patients With Atopic Eczema Who Took Part in Study 1368-0032

February 10, 2025 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

An Open Label Extension Study to Assess the Long Term Safety of Treatment With BI 655130 Administered Subcutaneously in Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

To assess the long term safety and efficacy of treatment with BI 655130 in patients with AD who have completed and have responded to treatment in the parent study 1368-0032

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2X 2V1
        • Innovaderm Research Inc.
      • Kanagawa, Yokohama, Japan, 240-0004
        • Tennocho Ekimae Dermatology and Allergology
      • Tokyo, Hachioji, Japan, 193-0998
        • Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center
    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85260
        • CCT Research
    • Florida
      • Fort Myers, Florida, United States, 33912
        • Clinical Physiology Associates
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33126
        • Finlay Medical Research Corp
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33613
        • ForCare Clinical Research, Inc.
    • Indiana
      • Plainfield, Indiana, United States, 46168
        • The Indiana Clinical Trials Center, PC
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73118
        • Unity Clinical Research
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75230
        • Dermatology Treatment and Research Center, PA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed and dated written informed consent in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and local legislation prior to the start of any screening procedures
  • Patients who completed the 1368-0032 trial and did not prematurely discontinue treatment prior to week 16, and; In the 1368-0032 re-allocation period (V7 to V11):

    • If an original non-responder from week 16 (V7), attained at least EASI 50 by last infusion (week 28) or by the EOS.
    • If an original responder from week 16 (V7) completed the last visit Week 28 (EOS) or dropped to a EASI 50 score prior to Week 28.
  • Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP)1 must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control per ICH M3 (R2) that result in a low failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly for the duration of the trial and 16 weeks after last study drug administration. A list of contraception methods meeting these criteria is provided in the patient information.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are pregnant, nursing, or who plan to become pregnant while in the trial.
  • Any new documented active or suspected malignancy except appropriately treated basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of uterine cervix.
  • Use of any restricted medication: or any drug considered likely to interfere with the safe conduct of the study, as assessed by the investigator.
  • Active systemic infections during the last two weeks prior to first drug administration.
  • Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug trial, except for 1368-0032.
  • Any condition which would prevent the patient continuing on treatment in this trial 1368-0037
  • Evidence of a current or previous disease, medical condition (including chronic alcohol or drug abuse or any condition) other than AD, surgical procedure, psychiatric or social problems, medical examination finding (including vital signs and ECG), or laboratory value at the screening outside the reference range that in the opinion of the investigator is clinically significant and would make the study participant unreliable to adhere to the protocol, comply with all study visits/procedures or to complete the trial, compromise the safety of the patient or compromise the quality of the data.
  • History of allergy/hypersensitivity to the systemically administered trial medication agent or its excipients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Spesolimab 600 mg

600 milligrams (mg) solution for subcutaneous (SC) injection of BI 655130 (Spesolimab) were to administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks.

All patients will return 16 weeks post the last treatment for an End of Study (EOS) visit.

Solution for SC injection
Other Names:
  • BI 655130

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) at Week 48
Time Frame: From first dose until Week 48, up to 48 weeks.
Number of patients with treatment emergent adverse events (AEs) at week 48. The treatment emergent adverse event refer to the adverse event with an onset between start of treatment and end of the 16-week residual effect period after the last dose of trial medication.
From first dose until Week 48, up to 48 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage Change From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 48
Time Frame: At baseline and at Week 48.
The EASI scoring system is used routinely in patients with psoriasis to describe signs and severity of the disease. It assesses the extent of disease at four body sites and measures four clinical signs: erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe)). The EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores, resulting in the EASI score ranges from 0 (clear) to 72 (very severe), with higher score indicating more severe disease extent and clinical signs. The percent change from baseline in EASI is calculated as: (EASI at week 48 - EASI at baseline) / EASI at baseline * 100%.
At baseline and at Week 48.
Percentage of Patients With a 50% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI50) at Week 48
Time Frame: At baseline and at Week 48.
The EASI scoring system is used routinely in patients with psoriasis to describe signs and severity of the disease. It assesses the extent of disease at four body sites and measures four clinical signs: erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe)). The EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores, resulting in the EASI score ranges from 0 (clear) to 72 (very severe), with higher score indicating more severe disease extent and clinical signs. [(EASI at week 48 - EASI at baseline) / EASI at baseline * 100%] ≥ 50%, then EASI50 = 1.
At baseline and at Week 48.
Percentage of Patients With a 75% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI75) at Week 48
Time Frame: At baseline and at Week 48.
The EASI scoring system is used routinely in patients with psoriasis to describe signs and severity of the disease. It assesses the extent of disease at four body sites and measures four clinical signs: erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe)). The EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores, resulting in the EASI score ranges from 0 (clear) to 72 (very severe), with higher score indicating more severe disease extent and clinical signs. [(EASI at week 48 - EASI at baseline) / EASI at baseline * 100%] ≥ 75%, then EASI75 = 1.
At baseline and at Week 48.
Change From Baseline in SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Week 48
Time Frame: At baseline and at Week 48.
The SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) index assesses elements: extent of disease, disease severity and subjective symptoms. The SCORAD consists of three elements: extent of disease, intensity of disease, and subjective symptoms (Pruritus and Sleep Loss). These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: score range 0-1-2), disease severity (B: score range 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C: score range 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103 for SCORAD score. The SCORAD range from 0 (no disease) to 103 (severe disease). The higher the SCORAD score, the more severe the Atopic Dermatitis is.
At baseline and at Week 48.
Percentage of Patients Achieving at Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline to Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) at Week 48
Time Frame: At baseline and at Week 48.
The IGA scale allows investigators to assess overall disease severity at one given time point, and it consists of a five-point severity scale from clear to very severe disease (0= clear,1 =almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4= severe disease). The IGA scale uses clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation, oozing and crusting as guidelines for the overall severity assessment.
At baseline and at Week 48.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 24, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 28, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 23, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Clinical studies sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim, phases I to IV, interventional and non-interventional, are in scope for sharing of the raw clinical study data and clinical study documents. Exceptions might apply, e.g. studies in products where Boehringer Ingelheim is not the license holder; studies regarding pharmaceutical formulations and associated analytical methods, and studies pertinent to pharmacokinetics using human biomaterials; studies conducted in a single center or targeting rare diseases (in case of low number of patients and therefore limitations with anonymization).

For more details refer to: https://www.mystudywindow.com/msw/datatransparency

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After all regulatory activities are completed in the US and EU for the product and indication, and after the primary manuscript has been accepted for publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

For study documents - upon signing of a 'Document Sharing Agreement'. For study data - 1. after the submission and approval of the research proposal (checks will be performed by both the independent review panel and the sponsor, including checking that the planned analysis does not compete with sponsor's publication plan); 2. and upon signing of a 'Data Sharing Agreement'.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dermatitis, Atopic

Clinical Trials on Spesolimab

Subscribe