Time Efficiency and Obturation Quality of Rotary Versus Manual in Primary Teeth

February 7, 2023 updated by: Reem Mahmoud Abdelkader Awad

Time Efficiency and Obturation Quality of Rotary Files Versus Manual Files in Pediatric Endodontics

The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of obturation and the time efficiency of rotary versus manual instrumentation in roots of deciduous molars clinically where the:

  • Primary objective Is to evaluate the time efficiency
  • Secondary objective Is to evaluate the quality of obturation Clinical and radiographical follow up will be performed for 18 months to investigate the clinical and the radiographic success for the Conventional and Rotary groups.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study will be conducted in two parts as follows:

In-vitro part as a training part to practice, test the speed of the rotary system, followed by application clinically.

Obturation will be done using two different filling techniques:

  • Incremental filling Technique
  • Disposable syringe Technique.

Then the instrumentation time and the quality of obturation will be recorded.

The study will be conducted by recruiting patients from the Outpatient clinic of The Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University:

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

41

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 02
        • Ain shams univeristy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 7 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

-

Children included in the study should conform to the following criteria:

  1. Patients between ages 4-7 years old with at least one mandibular vital or non-vital primary molar indicated for pulpectomy will be selected.
  2. Absence of periapical or interadicular radiolucencies, inflammatory root resorption, sinus tract or gingival abscess.
  3. No physiological root resorption.
  4. The teeth should have enough coronal structure for full coverage Stainless-Steel crowns.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Children who are extremely uncooperative and difficult to manage 2. Children suffering from any physically or mentally disability that will complicate the treatment: Special Health Care needs (SHCN) 3. Teeth of poor prognosis due to presence of an abscess or a sinus, mobility, advanced bone or root resorption or Non-Restorable teeth.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Rotary instrumentation using MM files 1
Rotary instrumentation using MM files (IMD Inc, China), sizes 20-25-30 taper 0.4, length 16 mm, then obturation with Zinc oxide and Eugenol using Incremental filling Technique.
Rotary instrumenation used in pulp therapy
Active Comparator: Manual instrumentation using K-files 1
Manual instrumentation using K-files (Mani Inc, Tochigi, Japan), sizes 15-20-25-30-35 then obturation with Zinc oxide and Eugenol using Incremental filling Technique.
manual instrumentation used in pulp therapy
Experimental: Rotary instrumentation using MM files 2
Rotary instrumentation using MM files (IMD Inc, China), sizes 20-25-30 taper 0.4, length 16 mm, then obturation with Zinc oxide and Eugenol using Disposable syringe technique.
Rotary instrumenation used in pulp therapy
Active Comparator: Manual instrumentation using K-files 2
Manual instrumentation using K-files (Mani Inc, Tochigi, Japan), sizes 15-20-25-30-35 then obturation with Zinc oxide and Eugenol using Disposable syringe technique
manual instrumentation used in pulp therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Is to evaluate the time efficiency of the rotary mm files versus manual stainless steel k files in the pulpectomy of lower second primary molars affecting the positive behavior of the child
Time Frame: up to 18 months
Time efficiency of instrumentation using rotary mm files specially designed for primary teeth versus manual stainless steel K-files in the pulpectomy of mandibular second primary molars, by clinical and radiographic evaluation for 18 months.
up to 18 months
Is to evaluate and compare the quality of obturation using two different obturation techniques following instrumentation by rotary mm files and manual stainless steel k files instrumentation in another group
Time Frame: up to 18 months
The quality of obturation using ZOE will be performed with either the incremental technique or the modified disposable syringe technique, following instrumentation by rotary and manual files, where the grading will be as : 1: overfilled, 2: underfilled 3: optimum filling.
up to 18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Is to evaluate the time efficiency In vivo and In vitro
Time Frame: up to 18 months
Comparing the Instrumentation time upon usage of Manual Instrumentation and Rotary Instrumentation in order to enhance patient cooperation.
up to 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PED19-2D

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endodontic Disease

Subscribe