Efficiency of an Optimized Care Organization for Fibromyalgia Patients. The FIMOUV 2 Study (FIMOUV 2)

Efficiency of an Optimized Care Organization for Fibromyalgia Patients Within the Group of Hospitals of Loire Territory. Interventional Study Aimed at Changing Behaviour in Terms of Physical Activity and Sedentary

Fibromyalgia affects 2 to 5% of adults in the general population. Patients describe a combination of symptoms centred around fatigue not induced by exercise and not relieved by rest.

The diagnosis of fibromyalgia is self-perpetuating by the deconditioning, consequence of a reduced muscle mass due to inactivity and periods of prolonged rest.

Thus, it seems fundamental to develop other non-drug approaches: among them, adapted physical activity is recommended by most learned societies because of a good level of evidence (Level 1, Grade A). The question remains, however, whether simple advice to resume physical activity is sufficient (routine care with medical assessment at 3 months) or whether a physical activity supervised inside and outside the hospital is not more relevant.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In order to set up an optimal patient path within the Group of hospitals of Loire territory, the working group composed of doctors from different specialities of the department considered it important to carry out a randomised study evaluating the effectiveness of a healthcare organisation combining:

  • an adapted and supervised physical activity intervention (1 month hospital initiation then 2 months in town)
  • therapeutic education sessions for the patient with motivational interviews Compared to usual clinical practice (adapted physical activity adapted in autonomy at home + therapeutic patient education sessions with motivational interviews).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

330

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Annonay, France, 07100
        • CH d'ANNONAY
      • Firminy, France, 42700
        • CH de Firminy
      • Montbrison, France, 42600
        • CH de MONTBRISON
      • Rive-de-Gier, France, 42800
        • CH de Rive de Gier
      • Roanne, France, 42300
        • CH de ROANNE
      • Saint-Chamond, France, 42400
        • CH du Gier
      • Saint-Etienne, France, 42055
        • CHU Saint Etienne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient diagnosed with fibromyalgia according to ACR (American College of rheumatology) criteria (total score WPI (Widespread Pain Index) + SS (Severity Scale) ) ≥ 13
  • French writing and speaking
  • Sedentary or low level of activity (less than 150 minutes of regular physical activity per week at the time of inclusion)
  • Signature of informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiac or respiratory diseases that contraindicate the practice of physical activity
  • Significant co-morbidities that contraindicate the practice of physical activity: associated cardiac pathologies (severe rhythm disorders such as rapid atrial fibrillation), respiratory pathologies (severe obstructive or severe respiratory insufficiency), disabling joint pathologies (knee osteoarthritis or osteoarthritis of the hip) training on a treadmill or on a high intensity bike).
  • Impossibility of submitting to the medical monitoring of the program for geographical, social or psychological reason

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: fibromyalgia patients with physical activity program
Two weekly exercise sessions at the university hospital of St-Etienne for 1 month then relay outside in a sports association or club certified "Sports Health" in the Loire (42) or Haute-Loire (43) for 2 months.
Two weekly exercise sessions at the university hospital of St-Etienne for 1 month then relay outside in a sports association or club certified "Sports Health" in the Loire (42), Haute-Loire (43) or Ardèche (07) for 2 months.
Other: fibromyalgia patients with physical activity at home
Advice and recommendations of physical activity at home (= current clinical practice, from 1 to 3 sessions per week in autonomy).
Advice and recommendations of physical activity at home (= current clinical practice, from 1 to 3 sessions per week in autonomy).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
physical activity
Time Frame: 12 months
Measure the durability of adherence/therapeutic compliance of fibromyalgia patients based on an objective measurement of physical activity: average measured from 7 days of actimetry, Actigraph
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
sedentary
Time Frame: 12 and 24 months
Measure the durability of adhesion/therapeutic compliance of fibromyalgia patients based on an objective measurement of sedentary : average measured from 7 days of actimetry, Actigraph
12 and 24 months
physical activity
Time Frame: 0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Objective and repeated measurement of physical activity over 7 days using actimetry, Actigraph
0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
sedentary
Time Frame: 0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Objective and repeated measurement of sedentary over 7 days using actimetry, Actigraph
0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
health status
Time Frame: 0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
measured with Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) : on a 7-point scale, rated from 1 for "much worse" to 7 for "much better". It is a simple and practical evaluation tool to use. The combination of the level of achievement via the Patient Global Impression of Change and the initial documentation of the patient's objectives via the shared educational assessment is a relevant and understandable approach for the patient.
0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
fatigue
Time Frame: 0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months

assessed by Fatigue Severity Scale. This is a short questionnaire of 9 questions to which the patient answers on a scale from 1 to 7.

Simply add the scores and divide by 9 - you get a result on 7 points. The higher the result, the greater the fatigue. Several studies speak of a threshold at 5.5

0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Quality of sleep
Time Frame: 0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months

assessed by the Pittsburgh. The questionnaire includes 19 self-assessment questions and 5 questions for the spouse or roommate (if any). Only self-assessment questions are included in the score.

The 19 self-assessment questions combine to give 7 components" of the score with each component receiving a score of 0 to 3.

In all cases, a score of 0 indicates that there is no difficulty while a score of 3 indicates the existence of severe difficulties. The 7 components of the score add up to give an overall score from 0 to 21 points, 0 meaning that there is no difficulty, and 21 indicating on the contrary major difficulties.

0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Anxiety and Depression
Time Frame: 0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) : An overall score of 19 or more indicates a major depressive episode. An overall score of 13 corresponds to adjustment disorders and minor depression.
0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
pain catastrophizing
Time Frame: 0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
assessed by the PCS (pain catastrophizing scale) assessing catastrophism : there are thirteen statements describing different thoughts and emotions that may be associated with pain. the person must indicate how painful these thoughts and emotions are. From 0= not at all to 4 = all the time
0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
pain evaluation
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
assessed by analog visual evaluation of pain (0= no pain and 10 = very painful)
6 and 12 months
fatigue evaluation
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
assessed by analog visual evaluation of fatigue (0= no fatigue and 10 = maximum fatigue)
6 and 12 months
muscle power
Time Frame: 0, 1 and 3 months
evaluated by dynamometry on a stress platform (arms and legs) and by a pocket dynamometer.
0, 1 and 3 months
muscular endurance
Time Frame: 0, 1 and 3 months
evaluated by dynamometry on a stress platform (arms and legs).
0, 1 and 3 months
gas exchange measurement
Time Frame: 0, 1 and 3 months
evaluated during a stress test
0, 1 and 3 months
fatigue
Time Frame: 0, 1 and 3 months
evaluated with Baroreflex Sensitivity. measurement of the slope of the baroreflex
0, 1 and 3 months
quantification of physical activity in meter-h/week
Time Frame: 0, 1, 3, 6,12 and 24 months
evaluated by the APAQ : Adult Physical Activity Questionnaire
0, 1, 3, 6,12 and 24 months
sedentary times in hours/day
Time Frame: 0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
evaluated by the APAQ : Adult Physical Activity Questionnaire
0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
patient adherence
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
number of sessions performed
6 and 12 months
Direct medical costs
Time Frame: 12 months
consultations, examinations, hospitalizations in euros
12 months
Direct non-medical costs
Time Frame: 12 and 24 months
transport
12 and 24 months
Cost of lost productivity
Time Frame: 12 and 24 months
time not worked
12 and 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David HUPIN, CHU de Saint Étienne

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 23, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 27, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Physical Activity

Clinical Trials on physical activity program

Subscribe