Comparison of the Safety and Cost of a Simplified Post-Operative Radiograph (SPOR) Protocol (SPOR)

September 27, 2019 updated by: University of Manitoba

Definitive Study for Non-inferiority Randomized Control Trial Comparing the Safety and Cost of a Simplified Post-Operative Radiographic (SPOR) Protocol for Selected Fractures

The standard post-operative radiographic protocol for the monitoring of fractures at Health Sciences Centre includes post-operative in hospital radiographs as well as radiographs at the two week follow up appointment. This is in addition to good quality intra-operative radiographs. With current operative techniques and implants, orthopaedic surgeons can achieve reliably stable internal fixation. In fact, patients are often allowed to take weight through the fractured limb immediately post-operatively. In these cases, redundant post-operative radiographs likely represent an avoidable cost to the system financially, and an avoidable cost to the patient in additional time spent in hospital and unnecessary radiation exposure.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1612

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least one lag screw for each fracture line
  • At least one compression plate across each fracture line
  • Locked intramedullary nail
  • Articular/peri-articular fracture with antiglide/under-contoured plate
  • Tension band technique (plate included) in simple fracture pattern
  • Operating surgeon is confident in fixation construct, despite non-load sharing criteria.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fracture >21 days old
  • Age <18 years, or open growth plates
  • Articular fracture with depression
  • Multiple orthopaedic fractures
  • History or radiographic appearance of osteoporosis/osteopenia or poor operative bone quality
  • Likely difficulty with follow-up in first 6 weeks

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control Group
Patients will receive standard radiographs post-operative day one or two in hospital, as well as radiographs in clinic at two and six weeks.
Patients will receive standard radiographs post-operative day one or two in hospital, as well as radiographs in clinic at two and six weeks.
EXPERIMENTAL: Treatment Group
These patients will not have routine post-operative in hospital radiographs, or radiographs in clinic at two weeks, unless clinically indicated.
These patients will not have routine post-operative in hospital radiographs, or radiographs in clinic at two weeks, unless clinically indicated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of a simplified post-operative radiographic protocol for fractures with stable fixation.
Time Frame: At six weeks.

Incidence of adverse events with a simplified X-ray protocol within the first six weeks of treatment compared to the standard protocol.

Adverse events are defined as radiographic signs of implant related failure within the first six weeks of treatment and noted on the six week radiographs.

At six weeks.
Cost-effectiveness of a simplified post-operative radiographic protocol for fractures with stable fixation.
Time Frame: At six weeks.
Cost of a simplified X-ray protocol compared to the standard protocol. Cost-effectiveness will be measured by calculating cost of x-ray, patient care and time spent by patients in clinic.
At six weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction: with a simplified post-operative radiographic protocol.
Time Frame: At six weeks.

A validated 17 question survey tool is used with each question in a 10 centimeter visual analog scale format. Examples of scale ranges (0-10) are provided. The following is a list of some questions asked of participants:

  1. Staff don't seem to listen to anything I tell them during my consultation.

    Agree Disagree

  2. I feel that I'm in good hands when I come to the clinic.

    Agree Disagree

  3. I'm always given a clear explanation of why I am having tests done.

    Agree Disagree

  4. There are some things about my care in the clinic which could be improved.

    Agree Disagree

  5. The person I see in clinic really
At six weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tudor V Tufescu, BSc, MD, FRCSC, University of Manitoba

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

May 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HS22019 (B2018:067)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fractures, Bone

Clinical Trials on X-ray

Subscribe