Comparative Effect of Hypotensive Anaesthesia on Event Related Potentials, Quantitative Electroencephalograghy

September 28, 2019 updated by: Mona Hussein, Beni-Suef University

Comparative Effect of Hypotensive Anaesthesia Using Nitroglycerine vs Phentolamine on Event Related Potentials, Quantitative Electroencephalograghy and Cognitive Function in Patients Undergoing Septoplasty

AIM OF THE WORK The aim of this work was to compare the effect of hypotensive anaesthesia using Nitroglycerine versus phentolamine on Event related potentials, quantitative Electroencephalograghy and cognitive function, in patients undergoing septoplasty.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

METHODS:

Study design and population: This is a pilot prospective randomized clinical trial that will be carried out on 60 patients candidate for septoplasty subjected to general hypotensive anaesthesia. The patients will be recruited from Ear, nose and throat surgery department, Beni-Suef University Hospital. All the participants will be required to offer a written informed consent

Sampling Technique:

Patients will be randomly assigned into one of two equal groups; the first group will receive nitroglycerine (30 participants) (nitroglycerine group) and the second group will receive phentolamine (30 participants) (phentolamine group). Randomization will be carried out using a closed opaque envelope technique with the anesthetist will pick up a sealed envelope which contains a paper with the name of the group to which the patient will be randomized is written. Whichever the group written on the paper, the patient will be scheduled to it.

All included patients will be subjected to the following:

1) Cognitive assessment:

Cognitive functions for the patients will be assessed (preoperative and 1 week postoperative) using the following psychometric tests:

  1. Paired Associate Learning test (PALT) Aim: to assess auditory verbal memory. The test uses the concept of semantic cueing

    .

  2. Benton Visual Retention test (BVRT) Aim: to assess visual perceptual, visual memory, visual motor and visuoconstructive abilities.

2) Neurophysiological assessment: Digital Electroencephalograghy (EEG), quantitative Electroencephalograghy (QEEG) and Event related potentials (ERPs) and will be done for all included patients (preoperative and 1 week postoperative).

Statistical analysis The sample size will be calculated using G*Power version 3.1.9.2 Software based on this pilot study. The probability of type I error (α) will be 5%, and the statistical power (1-β) should exceed 80%. The data will be coded and entered using: the statistical package for social science version 15 (SPSS v 15). Descriptive statistics will be reported as mean ± SD and number (%) for categorical variables. Student t- test will be used for comparison between means of two unpaired groups of quantitative variables. Paired sample t- test will be used for comparison between means of two paired groups of quantitative variables. Chi square test will be used for comparison between two groups of categorical data. Mixed ANOVA test will be used for comparing paired data in two unpaired groups. The probability/significance value (P value) ≥ 0.05 is not statistically significant and <0.05 is statistically significant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are candidate for septoplasty
  • Patients from both sexes, aged between 20-50 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who develop intraoperative shock or major bleeding
  • Patients with ischemic heart diseases, heart block, congestive heart failure, valvular heart diseases, or uncontrolled hypertension
  • Patients with a history of central neurological system disorder
  • Patients with concomitant medical or metabolic illness known to affect cognition
  • Pregnant females
  • Allergy to any of the anaesthetic or hypotensive drugs used in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Nitroglycerine
Patients will receive hypotensive anesthesia with nitroglycerine infusion via syringe pump by adding 5mg (5ml) of Nitroglycerin to 45ml of normal saline making it to final concentration of 100μg/ml at the rate of 0.5- 10 μg/kg/min according to the patients desired target blood pressure.

effect of hypotensive anaesthesia using Nitroglycerine vs Phentolamine on Event related potentials, quantitative Electroencephalograghy and cognitive function

Phentolamine group (30 patients): Patients will receive hypotensive anesthesia with phentolamine infusion via syringe pump by adding 20 mg (2ml) of Phentolamine to 48 ml of normal saline making it to final concentration of 0.4 mg/ml at the rate of 0.1-2 mg/min according to the patients desired target blood pressure.

Nitroglycerine group (30 patients): Patients will receive hypotensive anesthesia with nitroglycerine infusion via syringe pump by adding 5mg (5ml) of Nitroglycerin to 45ml of normal saline making it to final concentration of 100μg/ml at the rate of 0.5- 10 μg/kg/min according to the patients desired target blood pressure.

Other Names:
  • hypotensive anaesthesia using Phentolamine
Other: Phentolamine
Patients will receive hypotensive anesthesia with phentolamine infusion via syringe pump by adding 20 mg (2ml) of Phentolamine to 48 ml of normal saline making it to final concentration of 0.4 mg/ml at the rate of 0.1-2 mg/min according to the patients desired target blood pressure.

effect of hypotensive anaesthesia using Nitroglycerine vs Phentolamine on Event related potentials, quantitative Electroencephalograghy and cognitive function

Phentolamine group (30 patients): Patients will receive hypotensive anesthesia with phentolamine infusion via syringe pump by adding 20 mg (2ml) of Phentolamine to 48 ml of normal saline making it to final concentration of 0.4 mg/ml at the rate of 0.1-2 mg/min according to the patients desired target blood pressure.

Nitroglycerine group (30 patients): Patients will receive hypotensive anesthesia with nitroglycerine infusion via syringe pump by adding 5mg (5ml) of Nitroglycerin to 45ml of normal saline making it to final concentration of 100μg/ml at the rate of 0.5- 10 μg/kg/min according to the patients desired target blood pressure.

Other Names:
  • hypotensive anaesthesia using Phentolamine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Paired Associate Learning test for assessment of Cognitive function
Time Frame: 1 week
Comparative effect of hypotensive anaesthesia using Nitroglycerine vs Phentolamine
1 week
Benton Visual Retention test for assessment of Cognitive function
Time Frame: 1 week
Comparative effect of hypotensive anaesthesia using Nitroglycerine vs Phentolamine
1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantitative Electroencephalograghy for assessment of electrical activity of the brain
Time Frame: 1 week
Comparative effect of hypotensive anaesthesia using Nitroglycerine vs Phentolamine
1 week
Event related potentials (ERP ) P300 for neurophysiological assessment of cognition
Time Frame: 1 week
Comparative effect of hypotensive anaesthesia using Nitroglycerine vs Phentolamine
1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Effect of Drugs

Clinical Trials on hypotensive anaesthesia using Nitroglycerine

Subscribe