Preservation vs. Dissection of Inferior Pulmonary Ligament for Thoracoscopic Upper Lobectomy

August 21, 2023 updated by: Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

Preservation vs. Dissection of Inferior Pulmonary Ligament for Thoracoscopic Upper Lobectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial(IPLP FJUNION)

Many thoracic surgeons tend to dissect the inferior pulmonary ligament (IPL) during upper lobectomy, which in theory reduces the free space in the upper thoracic cavity by increasing the mobility of the residual lung. However, the dissection of IPL may lead to bronchial deformation, stenosis, obstruction or lobe torsion, and distortion. Some studies have found that stenosis might be associated with chronic dry cough and shortness of breath, and could result in a significant decline in lung function. Moreover, the dissection of IPL may lead to greater surgical trauma and increase the incidence of complications. Therefore, this study tries to identify whether we should dissect or preserve the inferior pulmonary ligament during the thoracoscopic upper lobectomy.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

270

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Fujian
      • Fuzhou, Fujian, China, 350001
        • Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 18 years old < age < 70 years old;
  2. Meet the indications for thoracoscopic left/right upper lobectomy;
  3. Gave informed consent and were willing to undergo thoracoscopic left/right upper lobectomy;
  4. Preoperative pulmonary function test: FEV1>1L and FEV1>60% of the predicted value;
  5. Preoperative ECOG score of 0-1;
  6. Preoperative ASA score I-II.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inferior mediastinal lymphadenopathy was found in preoperative screening;
  2. Found that other lobe operations were required at the same time due to multiple lesions in the preoperative discussion;
  3. Pregnant or lactating women;
  4. Suffering from severe mental illness;
  5. History of thoracic surgery (including intrathoracic surgery only, excluding surface surgery such as mastectomy);
  6. History of unstable angina or myocardial infarction within the past six months;
  7. History of cerebral infarction or cerebral hemorrhage within the past six months;
  8. History of continuous systemic corticosteroid therapy within the past month;
  9. Abnormal coagulation function, bleeding tendency, or receiving antithrombotic or antiplatelet therapy recently;
  10. Suffering from severe liver, kidney, and other systemic diseases;
  11. Other situations that are not suitable for surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Dissecting the inferior pulmonary ligament
This group of patients will undergo the inferior pulmonary dessection during the upper lobe thoractomy.
Patients will be categorized into two groups: the division group ,who will receive the division of the inferior pulmonary ligament, and the preservation group, who will not.For the dissection group, we will dissect the inferior pulmonary ligament during the surgery.
Other: Preserving the inferior pulmonary ligament
This group of patients will undergo the inferior pulmonary preservation during the upper lobe thoractomy.
Patients will be categorized into two groups: the division group ,who will receive the division of the inferior pulmonary ligament, and the preservation group, who will not.For the preservation group, we will preserve the inferior pulmonay ligament during the surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in bronchial angle
Time Frame: 3 months after the operation
Change in bronchial angle of each arm(measured by coronal CT)
3 months after the operation
Change in bronchial angle
Time Frame: 6 months after the operation
Change in bronchial angle of each arm(measured by coronal CT)
6 months after the operation
Change in lung volume
Time Frame: 3 months after the operation
Change in lung volume of each arm(measured by Mimics Research 21.0 software)
3 months after the operation
Change in lung volume
Time Frame: 6 months after the operation
Change in lung volume of each arm(measured by Mimics Research 21.0 software)
6 months after the operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Apical dead space
Time Frame: Within 6 months after the operation
Apical dead space incidence rate
Within 6 months after the operation
Pleural effusion
Time Frame: Within 6 months after the operation
Pleural effusion incidence rate
Within 6 months after the operation
Lung infection
Time Frame: Within 6 months after the operation
Lung infection incidence rate
Within 6 months after the operation
Atrial fibrillation
Time Frame: During the postoperative hospital stay
Atrial fibrillation incidence rate
During the postoperative hospital stay
Operation time
Time Frame: During the operation
Operation time
During the operation
Postoperative hospital stay
Time Frame: During the postoperative hospital stay
Postoperative hospital stay
During the postoperative hospital stay
Closed thoracic drainage tube rentention time
Time Frame: During the postoperative hospital stay
Closed thoracic drainage tube rentention time
During the postoperative hospital stay
Disposable drainage catheter retention time
Time Frame: Within one month after the operation
Disposable drainage catheter retention time
Within one month after the operation
Pathologic cancer stage
Time Frame: After the operation
Pathologic cancer stage
After the operation
Histologic diagnosis
Time Frame: After the operation
Histologic diagnosis
After the operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Chun Chen, MD, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 9, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IPLP FJUNION

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Diseases

Clinical Trials on Dissection of the Inferior Pulmonary Ligament

Subscribe