Partnered Dance Aerobic Exercise as a Neuroprotective, Motor and Cognitive Intervention in Parkinson's Disease (PDAE in PD)

January 24, 2024 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a difficult to treat condition that impairs mobility and thinking. It is not fully treated by drugs and surgery. Two priority issues for most people with PD are "OFF-time" and Cognitive impairment. Even under best medical management, 74% of people with PD experience "OFF-time," which is when medications are just not working right. OFF-time severely impacts both quality of life and thinking. Cognitive problems are found even in newly diagnosed people with PD and are very difficult to treat. However, the investigators' research has shown that partnered dance-aerobic exercise (PDAE) reduces OFF-time on the official test for OFF-time of the Movement Disorders Society, the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale-IV, (MDS-UPDRS-IV). PDAE improves other symptoms too. Benefits of the therapy have lasted for at least one-month after PDAE sessions stopped. PDAE provides aerobic exercise during an improvisational, cognitively-engaging physical activity. Cognitive engagement is a critical component of PDAE. Previous research showed PDAE improved spatial cognition, the ability to navigate, to mentally picture shapes and paths in the mind and to know the relationships between objects, people and places. Also, the investigators showed with imaging of the brain using a magnet in a scanner that twice weekly PDAE training increases activity in brain regions used in thinking and decision making. The investigators know that exercise benefits mobility and cognitive problems. The investigators even think exercise might protect brain cells in people with PD. But no one has really been able to show with biomarkers that exercise is protective of brain cells in humans.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The investigators will conduct a study in Veterans and non-Veterans with diagnosed PD to compare PDAE versus walking for OFF-time, cognition, and brain cell protection. The investigators will use a method like a coin flip to decide if the participants will be doing PDAE or walking. Importantly, the investigators will see if brain cells are protected using a brain scan that looks at the areas affected by PD to determine the relative amounts of different hormones in the brain that are related to having Parkinson's. The investigators will use these measurements of these hormones to chart the course of brain cell breakdown in patients with PD who have done walking or PDAE for 16 months. The investigators think that that PDAE will be better at lessening OFF-time and making cognition better than walking. The investigators think this because participants have to really use the mind during PDAE because the participants have so much to think about in terms of the steps and patterns. The investigators will assign 102 Veterans with mild-moderate PD to either 16 months of PDAE or walking. The investigators will use a coin toss or other similar method to determine who goes in what group. The investigators need participants to be in the classes for 16-months because it takes that long for us to see if anything changed in the brain with those hormones. Participants will do twice weekly classes for the first 3 months and then will switch down to taking lessons just 1 time per week for 13 months. The investigators will schedule appointments for participants to be seen by the research team before Veterans begin lessons, at 3 months (after the twice weekly schedule) and at 16 months after all the lessons are completed. The appointments will consist of asking the Veterans about their OFF-time having them take a few memory and thinking tests. The investigators will also ask them to lie in a scanner for about an hour. The participants can rest in the scanner for about a 1/2 hour and also do a thinking task. The investigators will be able to answer the questions, "Is PDAE better than walking at lessening OFF-time and spatial cognition and slowing down brain cell death? This study is using cutting edge imaging techniques for the first time to see if dance or walking are helpful for slowing brain cell death. This project combines patient-centered, clinical science and mechanistic aims to improve health care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Madeleine E Hackney, PhD
  • Phone Number: 5006 (404) 321-6111
  • Email: mehackn@emory.edu

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30033-4004
        • Recruiting
        • Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur, GA
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Madeleine E. Hackney, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: older than 40 years (40 is upper limit for young onset PD)
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score >17
  • Able to walk with or without an assistive device at least 10 feet
  • Best corrected/aided acuity better than 20/70 in the better eye
  • Willingness to be randomized to either group
  • H&Y stages I-III
  • Report OFF times (reporting >0 on item 4.3 of the UPDRS-IV)
  • Show clear symptomatic benefit from antiparkinsonian medications

    • e.g., alleviated rigidity, bradykinesia, and tremor
  • Fluent in English to comprehend and participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Untreated Major Depression and major psychiatric illness
  • History of stroke, or traumatic brain injury
  • Pure-tone threshold average sensitivity at 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 kHz exceeds 40 dB
  • Previous participation in PDAE or WAE classes.
  • Alcohol abuse and/or use of antipsychotics
  • Lives outside of the study site or is planning to move out of the area in next year or leave the area for >1 month during the next year
  • Taking moderate to high doses of beta-blockers with a resting heart rate below 60 beats/min since exercise intensity is measured through target heart rate.
  • Severe cardiac disease, including:

    • New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV congestive heart failure
    • clinically significant aortic stenosis
    • history of cardiac arrest, use of a cardiac defibrillator
    • uncontrolled angina

      • as discussed we are not planning to perform routine exercise tolerance tests prior to enrollment
  • Other significant co-morbid disease that would impair ability to participate in the exercise-based intervention

    • e.g. renal failure on hemodialysis, excessive alcohol use (>14 drinks per wk)
  • Any contraindications to MRI eg claustrophobia, etc

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Partnered Dance Aerobic Exercise
Partnered Dance-Aerobic Exercise (PDAE) is an adapted form of Argentine tango, aka Adapted tango. Participants with PD will dance the follower role only and will dance with new partners (individuals without PD) every 15-20 minutes, a widely practiced method considered by the dance teaching community to enhance learning. Participants will engage in partnering exercises on how to interpret motor goals through touch, exercises to develop understanding of temporal relationship of movement to music, novel step introduction, connecting previously learned and novel step elements. Frequent repetition and musical stereotypes may foster implicit learning or muscle memory (i.e., motor learning, or procedural memory that involves consolidating a specific motor task into memory through repetition). Participants will not be required to memorize specific step patterns but will learn new steps in each class
Participants with PD will dance the follower role only and will dance with new partners (individuals without PD) every 15-20 minutes, a widely practiced method considered by the dance teaching community to enhance learning. Participants will engage in partnering exercises on how to interpret motor goals through touch, exercises to develop understanding of temporal relationship of movement to music, novel step introduction, connecting previously learned and novel step elements. Frequent repetition and musical stereotypes may foster implicit learning or muscle memory (i.e., motor learning, or procedural memory that involves consolidating a specific motor task into memory through repetition). Participants will not be required to memorize specific step patterns but will learn new steps in each class
Active Comparator: Walking Aerobic Exercise
Walking Aerobic Exercise (WAE) Participants in WAE will receive equivalent dose, volume, frequency, intensity and duration of exercise to the PDAE group. The investigators will receive equal contact and monitoring from study staff. WAE participants will report to the same facility and interact with the same interventionist and assistants. The investigators will participate in sessions focused on at least 60 minutes of walking with breaks ad libitum, and 1/2 hour balance and stretching. The investigators have a designated, safe and non-cluttered area for walking. WAE will also take place in groups, with research volunteers and assistants to ensure that PDAE and WAE participants both receive a socially engaging intervention.
The participants will receive equal contact and monitoring from study staff. WAE participants will report to the same facility and interact with the same interventionist and assistants. The participants will participate in sessions focused on at least 60 minutes of walking with breaks ad libitum, and 1/2 hour balance and stretching. The investigators have a designated, safe and non-cluttered area for walking. WAE will also take place in groups, with research volunteers and assistants to ensure that PDAE and WAE participants both receive a socially engaging intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Movement disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part IV total score
Time Frame: 16 months
The primary outcome, the MDS-UPDRS-IV score measures medication related motor fluctuations, including dyskinesias, OFF-time, functional impact and complexity of fluctuations, and dystonia. The investigators will administer a monthly OFF-state diary for corroboration of these scores.
16 months
Corsi Blocks product score
Time Frame: 16 months
The product score is the product of the span and number of correct trials achieved by the participant. The Corsi Blocks is a test of spatial cognition, specifically visuospatial working memory.
16 months
rate of change in iron accumulation in the substantia nigra pars compacta
Time Frame: 16 months
The investigators will measure R2* in the NM-MRI defined SNc using a published image processing and analysis method. This method leverages a standard space SNc atlas developed using control population NM-MRI data, enabling R2* measurement in SNc with no operator-dependent segmentation steps
16 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6 minute walk test (number of meters walked in 6 minutes)
Time Frame: 16 months
The six minute walk test is a validated test of endurance in older adults and in those with Parkinson disease. Participants are asked to walk as far as they can in 6 minutes, while being monitored and able to carry on a conversation. The distance is measured in meters.
16 months
cardiovascular output: V02 maximum
Time Frame: 16 months
This sub-maximal test can estimate the participant's VO2max and initial fitness level. This test uses a method in which heart rate (HR) workload values are obtained at 2-4 points and extrapolated to predict workload at the estimated maximum HR (e.g. 220-age). VO2max is then calculated from the predicted maximum workload.
16 months
neural measure of spatial cognition (BOLD signal)
Time Frame: 16 months
At each study visit T1 MPRAGE, and T2* weighted blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) fMRI data will be acquired at the Emory CSI, using a Siemens Prisma-Fit 3T MRI scanner with a 64 channel receive-only head coil in a protocol with total scan time one hour. BOLD signal will be measured in response to the functional task, the Block span task.
16 months
rate of change in loss of neuromelanin in substantia nigra pars compacta
Time Frame: 16 months
At each study visit NM-MRI, R2*, T1 MPRAGE, and T2* weighted blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) fMRI data will be acquired. The investigators will carry out image processing to determine SNc volume using an automated approach previously shown to have high scan-rescan reproducibility.
16 months
Executive function: Tower Of London achievement score
Time Frame: 16 months
The Delis Kaplan tower of London test is a validated measure of executive function in PD.
16 months
Benton's judgment of line orientation task
Time Frame: 16 months
Judgment of Line Orientation is a standardized test of visuospatial skills commonly associated with functioning of the parietal lobe in the right hemisphere. The test measures a person's ability to match the angle and orientation of lines in space. Subjects are asked to match two angled lines to a set of 11 lines that are arranged in a semicircle and separated 18 degrees from each other.
16 months
gait- forward, fast as possible, backward speeds
Time Frame: 16 months
Objective, spatiotemporal parameters including velocity, stride length, stance percent, velocity variability and other variables of preferred, backward and fast-as-possible walking will be assessed.
16 months
attention: Trails Making Test A
Time Frame: 16 months
Trails making test A is a validated measure of attention and visuospatial processing in people with PD. The time to complete is considered.
16 months
spatial imagery: Brooks spatial memory task percent correct
Time Frame: 16 months
Brooks spatial memory involves reporting back a specified path of numbers that patients are asked to visualize in a 4 x 4 grid.
16 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mini BESTest score
Time Frame: 16 months
The Mini BESTest is a 14-item test scored on a 3-level ordinal scale. Mini BESTest assesses dynamic balance, a unidimensional construct. It is validated in PD.
16 months
Four Square Step Test (time to complete)
Time Frame: 16 months
The FSST is a valid measure of motor cognitive integration and involves the participant stepping as quickly and safely as they can in four quadrants created by four canes arranged in a cross, in a clockwise order and then switching to counterclockwise order.
16 months
Dynamic Gait index
Time Frame: 16 months
The DGI is a clinical tool to assess gait, balance and fall risk. It evaluates not only usual steady-state walking, but also walking during more challenging tasks.
16 months
Single/Dual Timed up and go (time to complete and dual task costs)
Time Frame: 16 months
Timed Up & Go Test (TUG) is a test of balance that is commonly used to examine functional mobility. The single condition requires participants to get up from a chair walk three meters, turn around and return to the chair as quickly and as safely as they can. The dual versions involve cognitive tasks (counting backward by 3s from given number) and manual, holding a full cup of water, while performing single tug.
16 months
Parkinson Disease Questionnaire -39
Time Frame: 16 months
The PDQ-39 is a 39-item self-report questionnaire, which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality over the last month Assesses how often patients experience difficulties across the 8 quality of life dimensions
16 months
composite physical function index
Time Frame: 16 months
This validate scale assesses the ability of people with impairments to complete various tasks of daily living ranging from holding a bag of groceries to walking a couple of blocks to being able to take a bath unassisted.
16 months
Movement disorders Society Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale parts I-III
Time Frame: 16 months
Part I assesses non motor aspects of experiences of daily living for people with PD. Part II assesses motor aspects of experiences of daily living for people with PD. Part III is a rated scale of motor function. The MDS UPDRS is validated and reliable and widely used globally.
16 months
Beck depression inventory score
Time Frame: 16 months
This widely used test of depression is validated in PD.
16 months
Freezing of Gait questionnaire total score
Time Frame: 16 months
The Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOG-Q) reliably detects FOG in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).
16 months
Physical Scale for the Elderly score (PASE)
Time Frame: 16 months
PASE comprises measures of self-reported occupational, household, and leisure activities during a one-week period. Designed for use in epidemiologic studies and exercise interventions, the instrument can be administered by telephone, mail, or in person in 5 to 15 minutes.
16 months
Short Form 12
Time Frame: 16 months
A generic, multipurpose short-form survey with 12 questions selected from the SF-36 Health Survey which, when combined, scored and weighted, results in two scales of mental and physical functioning and overall health-related quality of life. Subscales of interest include the Mental composite and physical composite scores among others.
16 months
Satisfaction with Training period questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 months
Participants will complete the Exit Questionnaire which asks their level of agreement on a Likert scale (1-5) with 1 indicating the most agreement about whether they think they improved in various aspects of wellbeing.
3 months
Satisfaction with Maintenance period questionnaire
Time Frame: 16 months
Participants will complete the Exit Questionnaire which asks their level of agreement on a Likert scale (1-5) with 1 indicating the most agreement about whether they think they improved in various aspects of wellbeing.
16 months
Satisfaction with Life scale
Time Frame: 16 months
Valid for PD, this scale allows self report of level of satisfaction with life and life events in people with PD.
16 months
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived social support (MSPSS)
Time Frame: 16 months
The MSPSS aims to determine how social support factors are perceived by individuals, with three subscales to evaluate support by family, friends and significant others.
16 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Madeleine E. Hackney, PhD, Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur, GA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 25, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease

Clinical Trials on PDAE

3
Subscribe