Long Term Monitoring for Risk of Sudden Death

November 12, 2020 updated by: Andrew Krahn, University of British Columbia

Long Term Monitoring to Detect Risk of Sudden Death in Inherited Arrhythmia Patients

Risk prediction in in inherited heart rhythm conditions that may cause sudden cardiac arrest or death is difficult. Sometimes the risks may be low but the loss of life in an otherwise healthy young individual is catastrophic. Clinicians often treat to the extreme to prevent this and so often those at unknown risk for a serious cardiac event are treated with an implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) to protect against sudden death even though the risk is low or unknown. ICDs them selves are not without adverse events such as needing battery replacements, mechanical complications, inappropriate shocks and body image and self esteem issues for the patient. This study will use an inject able monitor that is less invasive to monitor inherited heart rhythm patients long term to help gather long term heart rhythm data (3 years) on patients with an inherited heart rhythm that will help to detect symptoms of dangerous heart rhythms so that the appropriate care can be provided.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Risk stratification is challenging in latent genetically mediated sudden death syndromes, where the absolute risks are low but the loss of life is catastrophic in otherwise well young individuals. Countering this is the manifest drawbacks of liberal use of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICDs) in this population, who may suffer harm from the limitations of ICDs with respect to repeated generator changes, lead/mechanical complications, non-target shocks and issues with body image and self esteem. This balance is struck with patients and clinicians in the inherited arrhythmia clinics daily.

The Principal Investigator has a longstanding interest in cardiac monitoring and syncope, with extensive experience with cardiac monitoring technologies. Recently published data from the study team indicates that 69% of unexplained cardiac arrest patients had suffered syncope, presyncope, chest pain or palpitations, significantly greater than the 43% incidence in their first-degree relatives8. The prevalence of syncope was 34% in those patients with subsequently diagnosed inherited causes of cardiac arrest. This suggests an excellent opportunity to detect symptomatic and asymptomatic arrhythmias in patients to risk stratify patients and direct ICD resources to patients that are likely to benefit. Coupling of recording with remote monitoring of device-detected events enables a short time from detected arrhythmia to reporting and resultant clinical decision-making (base station in the patient's home transmits any acquired data daily).

An intermediate risk population is seen regularly in the inherited arrhythmia clinic, based on a wide array of clinical features that are proven or suspected risk markers in patients who either prefer to avoid an ICD, or whose risk is insufficient to clearly warrant an ICD. The risk in these individuals is hampered by the relatively uncommon short-term risk of spontaneous arrhythmia that is detected by routine 24-48 Holter surveillance to assist as a "tie breaker", to favor more aggressive therapy with an ICD. This study will extend the monitoring period of intermediate risk patients to 3 years and enable detection of symptomatic and asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmia that would inform risk discussion with the patient and favor more aggressive therapy. The latter may involve incremental drug therapy, cardiac sympathectomy or an ICD.

Loop recorder implantation (Reveal LINQ, Medtronic, Minneapolis MN), also called an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) has the ability to analyze the beat to beat variability of cardiac cycles on a 2 minute ECG strip and stores the tracing for visual confirmation of any cardiac events. The device also provides the patient with the ability to activate the device manually and so facilitates analysis of heart rhythm during symptomatic events.

The device is manufactured and will be provided by Medtronic Canada Ltd, 99 Hereford Street, Brampton, Ontario L6Y 0R3 +1 905-460-3800. The Medtronic Reveal LINQ is a programmable device that continuously monitors a patient's ECG and other physiological parameters. The device records cardiac information in response to automatically detected arrhythmias and patient activation. The form factor of the device has changed from that similar to a USB thumb drive that requires surgical implantation to that of a paper clip that can be injected in a minimally invasive environment including office based clean rooms. This device is small leadless and is inserted under the skin, in the chest. The device can be inserted by the physician in the office, saving precious healthcare resources.

Potential Adverse Events include but are not limited to:

  • Device rejection phenomena (including local tissue reaction)
  • Device migration
  • Infection
  • Erosion through the skin

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1051

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6E1M7
        • St. Paul's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Risk stratification is challenging in latent genetically mediated sudden death syndromes, where the absolute risks are low but the loss of life is catastrophic in otherwise well young individuals. Countering this is the manifest drawbacks of liberal use of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICDs) in this population, who may suffer harm from the limitations of ICDs with respect to repeated generator changes, lead/mechanical complications, non-target shocks and issues with body image and self esteem. This balance is struck with patients and clinicians in the inherited arrhythmia clinics daily.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Inherited Heart Rhythm (IHR) patient with breakthrough symptoms on best medical care that does not warrant an ICD, or patient declines ICD:

    • Syncope or seizure that is suspected to be arrhythmic in nature with a Brugada pattern on ECG
    • Long QT syndrome (LQTS)or Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia (CPVT) on beta blocker
    • Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC) with at least 2 minor or 1 major 2010 task force criteria,

      • must be more than isolated disease causing gene positive
  2. Asymptomatic IHR patient with extreme phenotype, does not warrant an ICD

    • spontaneous persistent type 1 Brugada pattern
    • macroscopic T wave alternates on resting ECG, Holter monitor or exercise test (especially Long QTS)
    • QTc > 500 msec in LQTS, other than LQT1
    • persistent asymptomatic bidirectional couplets or non-sustained PMVT in CPVT with exercise on therapy (including beta blocker and flecainide)
    • definite ARVC with some high risk feature (first degree relative with SCD, couplets or nsVT on Holter)
  3. Double mutation carrier IAC patient (at least one definite and one probable disease causing)
  4. Patient with class 1 indication for ICD who declines it (patient or parent declines, example: young patient with cardiac arrest)
  5. High-risk Cardiac arrest survivors with preserved ejection fraction (CASPER) unexplained cardiac arrest (UCA) patients and family members, defined as 2 or more of 1) previous syncope suspected to be arrhythmic 2) exercise recovery QTc ≥455 msec 3) epinephrine 0.10 μg/kg/min Δ QT ≥30 msec 4) Valt>0, k>3during Holter9 5) QTVI >95th %ile (>-1) on Holter9.
  6. High-risk patient not otherwise described above presented to an adjudication Committee with ≥75% consensus of risk.
  7. Willing signed informed consent form
  8. Ages 2 and over may participate (pediatric cases will be considered in Pediatric Centres only after the first 10 pilot cases are completed and reviewed by the DSMB Specialized pediatric procedures will be in developed by the pediatric clinicians)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable or unwilling to give informed consent
  2. ICD or pacemaker in place or considered preferable by the treating physician and/or patient/parent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Detection of ≥5 beats of non-sustained wide QRS complex tachycardia (i.e. likely to be VT).
Time Frame: From time of implant to time of cardiac event requiring intervention (maximum 3 years)
The number of irregular heart rates requiring change in treatment
From time of implant to time of cardiac event requiring intervention (maximum 3 years)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to diagnosis
Time Frame: From time of implant to time of recorded finding indicating a diagnosis (maximum 3 years)
Time to determine risk and required intervention
From time of implant to time of recorded finding indicating a diagnosis (maximum 3 years)
ICD implant rate
Time Frame: From time of implant to time of preventative treatment (maximum 3 years)
How many participants will require treatment with an implanted cardioverter defibrillator
From time of implant to time of preventative treatment (maximum 3 years)
Mortality
Time Frame: Time of implant until date of death (maximum 3 years)
In the event of a death the cause will be classified by the site investigator as cardiac, non cardiac, sudden and non sudden
Time of implant until date of death (maximum 3 years)
ICM Complication rate
Time Frame: Time of implant to time of treatment for complication (maximum 3 years)
Number of problems related to the device, infection, pain, premature removal
Time of implant to time of treatment for complication (maximum 3 years)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrew D Krahn, Dr., University of British Columbia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brugada Syndrome

3
Subscribe