Evaluation of the Respiratory Impact After Conventional or Minimally Invasive Esophageal Atresia Surgery (RestriMIS)

December 19, 2019 updated by: DENISE JOLIVOT, University Hospital, Angers

Evaluation of the Respiratory Impact of Post-operative Chest Wall Anomalies After Conventional or Minimally Invasive Esophageal Atresia Surgery

Right thoracotomy, conventional approach to esophageal atresia repair, leads to up to 60% radiological chest wall sequelae anomalies. The impact of these anomalies on the patient's respiratory function remains unknown. Minimally invasive thoracic surgery considerably reduces this rate.

The primary objective of this study is to assess the occurrence of restrictive lung disease in patients with type III esophageal atresia depending on the type of surgical approach (Conventional or minimally invasive).

The primary endpoint will be he occurrence of restrictive lung disease , objectified by pulmonary function tests (PFTs), carried out according to the current national guidelines (PNDS = protocole national de diagnostic et de soins).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Right thoracotomy, conventional approach to esophageal atresia repair, leads to up to 60% radiological chest wall sequelae anomalies. The impact of these anomalies on the patient's respiratory function remains unknown. Minimally invasive thoracic surgery considerably reduces this rate.

The primary objective of this study is to assess the occurrence of restrictive lung disease in patients with type III esophageal atresia depending on the type of surgical approach (Conventional or minimally invasive).

The primary endpoint will be the occurrence of restrictive lung disease, as assessed by pulmonary function tests (PFTs), carried out according to the current national guidelines (PNDS = protocole national de diagnostic et de soins).

The secondary endpoints will be to measure the severity of the restrictive disease, to look for other respiratory alterations, to correlate radiological chest wall sequelae anomalies with the impact on respiratory function and to look for a causal relationship between the surgical technique used and the respiratory impact.

The methodology used will be a retrospective non interventional study on the cohort of patients included in the national esophageal atresia registry (CRACMO, Lille University Hospital) between the 1st of january 2008 and the 31st of December 2013.

All the patients included in the national esophageal atresia registry (CRACMO) having had an operation for type III esophageal atresia (long gap esophageal atresia excluded), as defined by the Ladd Classification, will be included in this study.

The exclusion criterion will be patients lost to follow up or deceased, patients having had no pulmonary function tests (PFTs) or no thoracic X-Ray during the first 6 to 9 years of follow up and patients having had thoracic surgery before the esophageal atresia repair.

The number of patients expected in the national esophageal atresia registry over the 6 years excedes 500. The number of thoracoscopy repairs should be about 50.

This study should allow us to determine if minimally invasive surgery is beneficial on mid-term respiratory function in children, related to possible post-operative chest wall sequelae.

The results obtained from this study should lead to recommendations concerning the surgical approach to esophageal atresia repair to improve the prognosis of chest wall anomalies and respiratory function in these patients. It should also help to identify patient subgroups which would benefit from a reinforced respiratory follow up. This could then lead to a hospital clinical research program (PHRC)

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lille, France, 59000
        • CRACMO - centre de référence des atrésies de l'oesophage

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All the patients included in the national esophageal atresia registry (CRACMO) having had an operation for type III esophageal atresia, as defined by the Ladd classification between 01/01/2008 and 31/12/2013 and being followed up with thoracic X-rays and PFTs.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients included in the national esophageal atresia registry (CRACMO)
  • Operation for type III esophageal atresia (Ladd classification)
  • Between 01/01/2008 and 31/12/2013.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Long gap esophageal atresia
  • Patients lost to follow up
  • Deceased
  • No PFTs or X-rays between 6 and 9 years of follow up
  • Patients having had thoracic surgery before the esophageal atresia repair

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Conventional surgery
Patients having had esophageal atresia (type III, long gap excluded) repair by conventional surgery (right thoracotomy) or patients having had minimally invasive surgery converted to thoracotomy between the 1st of january 2008 and the 31st of December 2013 and registered on the national esophageal atresia registry (CRACMO, Lille university hospital)
Minimally invasive surgery
Patients having had esophageal atresia (type III, long gap excluded) repair through minimally invasive surgery between the 1st of january 2008 and the 31st of December 2013 and registered on the national esophageal atresia registry (CRACMO, Lille university hospital)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess the occurrence of restrictive lung disease in patients with type III esophageal atresia depending on the type of surgical approach (Conventional or minimally invasive).
Time Frame: 6 to 9 years of age.
Objectified by pulmonary function tests (PFTs), carried out according to the current national guidelines. Restrictive lung disease defined by: FEV1/FVC ratio > -1.64 Z-score and CVF < -1.64 Z-score according to ATS/ERS-GLI (American Thoracic Society & European Respiratory Society - Global Lungs Initiative) recommendations.
6 to 9 years of age.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity of restrictive lung disease
Time Frame: 6 to 9 years of age
Depending on Z-score value
6 to 9 years of age
Assesse the occurrence of obstructive or mixed lung disease
Time Frame: 6 to 9 years
Objectified by pulmonary function tests (PFTs), carried out according to the current national guidelines. Mixed lung disease defined by: FEV1/FVC ratio < -1.64 Z-score and CVF < -1.64 Z-score and obstructive lung disease
6 to 9 years
Mortality rate
Time Frame: Time of surgery to 6 to 9 years consultation
Percentage of mortality in each group, cause of death linked directly to surgery or not
Time of surgery to 6 to 9 years consultation
Percentage of post-operative complications depending on the type of surgery
Time Frame: Time of surgery to 6 to 9 years consultation
Bleeding, infection, anastomotic stenosis, anastomotic leak
Time of surgery to 6 to 9 years consultation
Chest wall anomalies detected on thoracic X-rays
Time Frame: 6 to 9 years of age
Hemivertebra, rib fusion, intercostal abnormalities, scoliosis
6 to 9 years of age
Correlation between post-operative chest wall anomalies and restrictive lung disease
Time Frame: 6 to 9 years of age
In each group, comparison of the percentage of chest wall anomalies detected on the X-rays and the percentage of restrictive lung disease cases
6 to 9 years of age

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 23, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophageal Atresia

Subscribe