A Standard Music Program Compared to an Optimized Music Program

August 17, 2021 updated by: Bernafon AG

A Clinical Investigation Comparing a Standard Hearing Aid Fitting Protocol and a Fitting Protocol Optimized for Musicians

The trial will test whether a standard music program that is an offset to the general program provides the same benefit as a music program that is individually customized for each test participant. The trial seeks to investigate the benefit received by musicians that regularly play an instrument and belong to an organized music group or orchestra instead of people that listen to music.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The initial goal of hearing aids is to amplify speech and facilitate speech understanding especially in noise. Besides speech difficulty, people with hearing loss also report a reduced enjoyment of music. The hearing aid settings used for amplifying speech often have adverse effects on music.

For this study, the sponsor will carry out testing with participants with hearing loss to compare dedicated music programs. The current study will compare the standard music program available in the software to one that is fine-tuned for each subject. The hearing aids that will be used for the study are certified by the European Conformity and have been on the market for almost one year. The goal is to determine whether musicians will perceive a difference and prefer a fine-tuned music program over the default music program in real-life situations.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All classifications of hearing loss (sensorineural, conductive, mixed)
  • If conductive or mixed, approval for amplification by a physician is needed
  • All shapes of hearing loss (flat, sloping, reverse slope, notch)
  • Severity ranging from mild to profound
  • German or French speaking
  • Play a musical instrument
  • Ability and willingness to sign the consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Normal hearing
  • Contraindications for amplification
  • Active ear disease
  • Don't play an instrument
  • Inability to follow the study procedures due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, or other cognitive problems
  • Unable to attend study appointments due to reduced mobility
  • Reduced ability to describe auditory impressions and usage of hearing aids
  • Uncooperative so that it is ot possible to record a valid audiogram
  • Severely reduced dexterity
  • Central hearing disorders
  • Sponsor employees
  • Family members of employees of the Sponsor

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Music program fine-tuned and standard
The fine-tuned program and the standard program will be compared within the same instrument as a hearing aid can have up to 4 different listening programs in it.
A digital, wireless hearing aid is programmed specifically to each subject's hearing loss and fitted with both a program that is fine-tuned for their specific music playing as well as the standard music program that uses pre-determined settings.
Other Names:
  • Viron 9 mini receiver-in-the-ear hearing aid

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Preference Rating
Time Frame: 20 days
Subjects will answer a questionnaire that asks them to choose which program that they preferred. The questionnaire gives Program 1 or Program 2 as the choices as well as a no Preference option for those that did not notice a difference between the two. The percentage of subjects that chose each Program will be calculated to determine if more preferred the optimized music program.
20 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sound Perception Test - Pitch
Time Frame: 0,10, and 20 days
The sound perception test is called the Adaptive Music Perception test. It is tested in the lab with digitally synthesized recordings of components of tones. It tests the overall perception of Meter with pitch (in Hz). A lower score is better. A higher score means that it took higher Levels of Hz to perceive a difference between musical notes.The subjects are tested in the unaided, aided with the standard program, and aided with the test (optimized) program. The scores will be averaged and analyzed to determine if one program results in better (lower) test scores.
0,10, and 20 days
Music Sound Quality Rating
Time Frame: 0,10, and 20 days
The sound quality of the devices when listening/playing music will be rated using a questionnaire. The questionnaire asks subjects to rate various aspects of the sound using a 5-point scale with 1 being the worst answer and 5 being the best. The questionnaire will be answered for Program 1 and Program 2. The scores for each question will be averaged across subjects and the difference between the two programs calculated to determine if one music program results in better sound quality scores. A positive score is in favor of the fine-tuned program and a negative score would be in favor of the standard program. They will test Program 1 and Program 2 during the same period as they have the ability to use a button on the Hearing aid to switch between programs.
0,10, and 20 days
Sound Perception Test - Duration
Time Frame: 0,10, and 20 days
The sound perception test is called the Adaptive Music Perception test. It is tested in the lab with digitally synthesized recordings of components of tones. It tests the overall perception of duration (in milliseconds). A lower score is better. A higher score means that it took longer in milliseconds to perceive a difference between musical notes.The subjects are tested in the unaided, aided with the standard program, and aided with the test (optimized) program. The scores will be averaged and analyzed to determine if one program results in better (lower) test scores.
0,10, and 20 days
Sound Perception Test - Level
Time Frame: 0,10, and 20 days
The sound perception test is called the Adaptive Music Perception test. It is tested in the lab with digitally synthesized recordings of components of tones. It tests the overall perception of Meter with Level (in decibels). A lower score is better. A higher score means that it took higher levels in dB to perceive a difference between musical notes.The subjects are tested in the unaided, aided with the standard program, and aided with the test (optimized) program. The scores will be averaged and analyzed to determine if one program results in better (lower) test scores.
0,10, and 20 days
Sound Perception Test - Brightness
Time Frame: 0,10, and 20 days
The sound perception test is called the Adaptive Music Perception test. It is tested in the lab with digitally synthesized recordings of components of tones. The perception of the Timber of music is tested by the brightness (measured in dB). Lower scores are better. A higher score means that it took higher levels in dB to perceive a difference between musical notes.The subjects are tested in the unaided, aided with the standard program, and aided with the test (optimized) program. The scores will be averaged and analyzed to determine if one program results in better (lower) test scores.
0,10, and 20 days
Sound Perception Test - Attack
Time Frame: 0,10, and 20 days
The sound perception test is called the Adaptive Music Perception test. It is tested in the lab with digitally synthesized recordings of components of tones. The perception of the Timber of music is tested by the attack (measured in Hz). Lower scores are better. A higher score means that it took higher levels in Hz to perceive a difference between musical notes.The subjects are tested in the unaided, aided with the standard program, and aided with the test (optimized) program. The scores will be averaged and analyzed to determine if one program results in better (lower) test scores.
0,10, and 20 days
Sound Perception Test - Spectral Irregularities
Time Frame: 0,10, and 20 days
The sound perception test is called the Adaptive Music Perception test. It is tested in the lab with digitally synthesized recordings of components of tones. The perception of the Timber of music is tested by the spectral irregularities (measured in dB). Lower scores are better. A higher score means that it took higher levels in dB to perceive a difference between musical notes.The subjects are tested in the unaided, aided with the standard program, and aided with the test (optimized) program. The scores will be averaged and analyzed to determine if one program results in better (lower) test scores.
0,10, and 20 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occurrence of Device Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: 0,10, and 20 days
The number of Device Related Adverse Events will be monitored and totaled. Each Adverse Event is measured using a severity scale of: mild, moderate, or severe. The causality is measured with a scale of: Not related, unlikely, possible, probable, and causal relationship.
0,10, and 20 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 9, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hearing Loss

Clinical Trials on Hearing aid with fine-tuned and standard programs

3
Subscribe