- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04147442
A Standard Music Program Compared to an Optimized Music Program
A Clinical Investigation Comparing a Standard Hearing Aid Fitting Protocol and a Fitting Protocol Optimized for Musicians
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The initial goal of hearing aids is to amplify speech and facilitate speech understanding especially in noise. Besides speech difficulty, people with hearing loss also report a reduced enjoyment of music. The hearing aid settings used for amplifying speech often have adverse effects on music.
For this study, the sponsor will carry out testing with participants with hearing loss to compare dedicated music programs. The current study will compare the standard music program available in the software to one that is fine-tuned for each subject. The hearing aids that will be used for the study are certified by the European Conformity and have been on the market for almost one year. The goal is to determine whether musicians will perceive a difference and prefer a fine-tuned music program over the default music program in real-life situations.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bern, Switzerland, 3018
- Bernafon AG
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All classifications of hearing loss (sensorineural, conductive, mixed)
- If conductive or mixed, approval for amplification by a physician is needed
- All shapes of hearing loss (flat, sloping, reverse slope, notch)
- Severity ranging from mild to profound
- German or French speaking
- Play a musical instrument
- Ability and willingness to sign the consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- Normal hearing
- Contraindications for amplification
- Active ear disease
- Don't play an instrument
- Inability to follow the study procedures due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, or other cognitive problems
- Unable to attend study appointments due to reduced mobility
- Reduced ability to describe auditory impressions and usage of hearing aids
- Uncooperative so that it is ot possible to record a valid audiogram
- Severely reduced dexterity
- Central hearing disorders
- Sponsor employees
- Family members of employees of the Sponsor
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Music program fine-tuned and standard
The fine-tuned program and the standard program will be compared within the same instrument as a hearing aid can have up to 4 different listening programs in it.
|
A digital, wireless hearing aid is programmed specifically to each subject's hearing loss and fitted with both a program that is fine-tuned for their specific music playing as well as the standard music program that uses pre-determined settings.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Preference Rating
Time Frame: 20 days
|
Subjects will answer a questionnaire that asks them to choose which program that they preferred.
The questionnaire gives Program 1 or Program 2 as the choices as well as a no Preference option for those that did not notice a difference between the two.
The percentage of subjects that chose each Program will be calculated to determine if more preferred the optimized music program.
|
20 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Sound Perception Test - Pitch
Time Frame: 0,10, and 20 days
|
The sound perception test is called the Adaptive Music Perception test.
It is tested in the lab with digitally synthesized recordings of components of tones.
It tests the overall perception of Meter with pitch (in Hz).
A lower score is better.
A higher score means that it took higher Levels of Hz to perceive a difference between musical notes.The subjects are tested in the unaided, aided with the standard program, and aided with the test (optimized) program.
The scores will be averaged and analyzed to determine if one program results in better (lower) test scores.
|
0,10, and 20 days
|
Music Sound Quality Rating
Time Frame: 0,10, and 20 days
|
The sound quality of the devices when listening/playing music will be rated using a questionnaire.
The questionnaire asks subjects to rate various aspects of the sound using a 5-point scale with 1 being the worst answer and 5 being the best.
The questionnaire will be answered for Program 1 and Program 2. The scores for each question will be averaged across subjects and the difference between the two programs calculated to determine if one music program results in better sound quality scores.
A positive score is in favor of the fine-tuned program and a negative score would be in favor of the standard program.
They will test Program 1 and Program 2 during the same period as they have the ability to use a button on the Hearing aid to switch between programs.
|
0,10, and 20 days
|
Sound Perception Test - Duration
Time Frame: 0,10, and 20 days
|
The sound perception test is called the Adaptive Music Perception test.
It is tested in the lab with digitally synthesized recordings of components of tones.
It tests the overall perception of duration (in milliseconds).
A lower score is better.
A higher score means that it took longer in milliseconds to perceive a difference between musical notes.The subjects are tested in the unaided, aided with the standard program, and aided with the test (optimized) program.
The scores will be averaged and analyzed to determine if one program results in better (lower) test scores.
|
0,10, and 20 days
|
Sound Perception Test - Level
Time Frame: 0,10, and 20 days
|
The sound perception test is called the Adaptive Music Perception test.
It is tested in the lab with digitally synthesized recordings of components of tones.
It tests the overall perception of Meter with Level (in decibels).
A lower score is better.
A higher score means that it took higher levels in dB to perceive a difference between musical notes.The subjects are tested in the unaided, aided with the standard program, and aided with the test (optimized) program.
The scores will be averaged and analyzed to determine if one program results in better (lower) test scores.
|
0,10, and 20 days
|
Sound Perception Test - Brightness
Time Frame: 0,10, and 20 days
|
The sound perception test is called the Adaptive Music Perception test.
It is tested in the lab with digitally synthesized recordings of components of tones.
The perception of the Timber of music is tested by the brightness (measured in dB).
Lower scores are better.
A higher score means that it took higher levels in dB to perceive a difference between musical notes.The subjects are tested in the unaided, aided with the standard program, and aided with the test (optimized) program.
The scores will be averaged and analyzed to determine if one program results in better (lower) test scores.
|
0,10, and 20 days
|
Sound Perception Test - Attack
Time Frame: 0,10, and 20 days
|
The sound perception test is called the Adaptive Music Perception test.
It is tested in the lab with digitally synthesized recordings of components of tones.
The perception of the Timber of music is tested by the attack (measured in Hz).
Lower scores are better.
A higher score means that it took higher levels in Hz to perceive a difference between musical notes.The subjects are tested in the unaided, aided with the standard program, and aided with the test (optimized) program.
The scores will be averaged and analyzed to determine if one program results in better (lower) test scores.
|
0,10, and 20 days
|
Sound Perception Test - Spectral Irregularities
Time Frame: 0,10, and 20 days
|
The sound perception test is called the Adaptive Music Perception test.
It is tested in the lab with digitally synthesized recordings of components of tones.
The perception of the Timber of music is tested by the spectral irregularities (measured in dB).
Lower scores are better.
A higher score means that it took higher levels in dB to perceive a difference between musical notes.The subjects are tested in the unaided, aided with the standard program, and aided with the test (optimized) program.
The scores will be averaged and analyzed to determine if one program results in better (lower) test scores.
|
0,10, and 20 days
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Occurrence of Device Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: 0,10, and 20 days
|
The number of Device Related Adverse Events will be monitored and totaled.
Each Adverse Event is measured using a severity scale of: mild, moderate, or severe.
The causality is measured with a scale of: Not related, unlikely, possible, probable, and causal relationship.
|
0,10, and 20 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- BF006-1902
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hearing Loss
-
University of California, San FranciscoPatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteRecruitingHearing Loss | Hearing Loss, Sensorineural | Hearing Loss, Bilateral | Hearing Loss, Conductive | Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced | Hearing Loss, Unilateral | Hearing Loss, Mixed | Hearing Disorders in ChildrenUnited States
-
Oticon MedicalRecruitingEar Diseases | Hearing Loss, Conductive | Hearing Loss Mixed | Hearing Disability | Conductive Hearing Loss | Conductive Hearing Loss, Bilateral | Conductive Hearing Loss, UnilateralUnited Kingdom
-
MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GesmbHCompletedHearing Loss | Hearing Loss, Sensorineural | Hearing Loss, Bilateral | Hearing Loss, Conductive | Hearing Loss, Unilateral | Hearing Loss, MixedAustria, Germany, United Kingdom
-
Oticon MedicalNot yet recruitingSensorineural Hearing Loss, Bilateral | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Severe | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Profound
-
Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of ManchesterCompletedCochlear Hearing Loss | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, BilateralUnited Kingdom
-
Oticon MedicalCompletedConductive Hearing Loss | Conductive and Sensori-neural Hearing Loss in the Same Ear | Unilateral, Profound Sensori-neural Hearing LossUnited States
-
Frequency TherapeuticsCompletedHearing Loss, Sensorineural | Presbycusis | Noise Induced Hearing Loss | Sudden Hearing LossUnited States
-
Frequency TherapeuticsCompletedHearing Loss, Sensorineural | Noise Induced Hearing Loss | Sudden Hearing LossUnited States
-
Otologic Pharmaceutics, Inc.CompletedHearing Loss | Sensorineural Hearing Loss | Noise-Induced Hearing LossUnited States
-
Frequency TherapeuticsCompletedHearing Loss, Sensorineural | Noise Induced Hearing Loss | Sudden Hearing LossUnited States
Clinical Trials on Hearing aid with fine-tuned and standard programs
-
Sonova AGCompleted
-
Sonova AGCompletedHearing Loss | Normal HearingSwitzerland
-
Liverpool School of Tropical MedicineIndonesia-MoH; Gadjah Mada University; Yayasan Pengembangan Kesehatan dan Masyarakat...CompletedMalaria in PregnancyIndonesia