Erector Spinae Block, Epidural Analgesia and Intrathecal Analgesia in Thoracic Surgery (SPIRIT)

October 29, 2019 updated by: University Hospital, Angers

Efficacités comparées du Bloc Des Muscles érecteurs du Rachis, du Bloc péridural et de la rachianalgésie en Chirurgie Thoracique Majeure.

Pulmonary thoracic surgery is often responsible for severe postoperative pain, which is associated with an increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality. Moreover, postoperative thoracic pain has a strong impact on patient rehabilitation and is associated with an increase in hospital stay.

Various analgesic techniques allow effective management of pain in the context of thoracic surgery. Regional anesthesia, particularly, allows a powerful analgesia, and limits the use of opioids and their side effects. Among regional anesthesia techniques, thoracic epidural analgesia has become the gold standard for post-thoracotomy analgesia. However, it induces a sympathetic block that promotes in particular per and postoperative hypotension and acute urinary retentions. Thus, new regional anesthesia techniques have been developed and assessed in thoracic surgery in order to avoid side effects related to epidural analgesia, particularly paravertebral block and erector spinae block, but also intrathecal analgesia. Paravertebral block has shown analgesic efficacy after thoracic surgery, and its interest in reducing the risk of hypotension, acute urinary retention, pruritus and postoperative nausea and vomiting compared with the epidural analgesia. Erector spinae block, recently described and evaluated in this context of thoracic surgery, seems to have the same interests and to be easier to achieve than the paravertebral block, but has been little studied. Finally, intrathecal morphine is frequently used because of an easy and rapid realization, and because it allows an adequate analgesia and the reduction of the duration of stay in intensive care compared to the epidural one. However, despite its frequent use, very few studies have compared intrathecal anesthesia with the epidural and other peri-spinal blocks.

These three types of analgesia, epidural analgesia, intrathecal morphine, and erector spinae block are regional anesthesia methods regularly used for pulmonary surgery in the department of the investigators. All of these techniques have shown their analgesic efficacy, but each seems to have particular respective interests, in terms of achievement, management, or perioperative rehabilitation. The objective of the investigators study is to evaluate the effectiveness of each of its techniques to treat postoperative pain and improve the rehabilitation of these patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Angers, France, 49100
        • CHU Angers - DEPARTEMENT D'ANESTHESIE REANIMATION

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients undergoing thoracic surgery for pulmonary resection in the University Hospital of Angers, in France.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Thoracic surgery for pulmonary resection
  • Scheduled regional anesthesia: epidural anesthesia, intrathecal morphine or erector spinae block

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No epidural anesthesia or no intrathecal morphine or no erector spinae block performed

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Epidural anesthesia
At physician discretion (observational study)
Preoperative epidural anesthesia at physician discretion
Intrathecal morphine
At physician discretion (observational study)
Preoperative intrathecal morphine at physician discretion
Erector spinae block
At physician discretion (observational study)
Preoperative erector spinae block at physician discretion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain assessment at H+48
Time Frame: Day 2 after surgery
Numerical pain rating scale: 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst imaginable pain)
Day 2 after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total consumption of morphine (per and postoperative)
Time Frame: Hour 2, Day 1, Day 2 and Day 3 after surgery.
Hour 2, Day 1, Day 2 and Day 3 after surgery.
Length of stay in intensive care unit
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Impact on respiratory function
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 2 and Day 3 after surgery.
Peak Flow in L/min
Day 1, Day 2 and Day 3 after surgery.
Frequency of adverse effects related to morphine Frequency of morphine side effects
Time Frame: Hour 2, Day 1, Day 2 and Day 3 after surgery.
Hour 2, Day 1, Day 2 and Day 3 after surgery.
Postoperative pain assessment at other times
Time Frame: Hour 2, Day 1, and Day 3 after surgery.
Numerical pain rating scale: 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst imaginable pain)
Hour 2, Day 1, and Day 3 after surgery.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

November 4, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 24, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Surgery

Clinical Trials on Epidural anesthesia

Subscribe