- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05127629
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Different Wound Closure Methods in Immediate Implant Placement in the Aesthetic Zone
Implant-supported restorations have become one of the best treatment options for patients with tooth loss, with predictable long-term success rates and clinical outcomes. Immediate implant placement means the implant is placed immediately after tooth extraction. It can significantly reduce treatment time because extraction socket healing and implant osseointegration occur simultaneously. Immediate implant placement has many benefits, reducing the overall treatment time, reducing the patient's surgical procedures, and reducing surgical trauma (no flap reversal). However, the treatment also has significant limitations, including the inability to predict the possibility of bone and soft tissue healing, and the possibility of subsequent unfavorable esthetic outcomes. However, the evidence regarding soft and hard tissue and aesthetic outcomes in patients treated with immediate implants in the aesthetic area remains inconclusive. As the aesthetic success of implant restorations is increasingly valued over implant survival, there are significant clinical benefits to addressing immediate implant bone tissue resorption and soft tissue deficiencies and improving the aesthetic outcome of immediate implant restorations.
To address the potential health and aesthetic problems associated with soft and hard tissue deficiencies around dental implants, bone grafting in the jumping gap and soft tissue grafting procedures are often performed. According to literature, autologous soft tissue grafts have shown the best clinical and histological results in soft tissue regeneration techniques. However, it requires removal of tissue from the patient's donor area, which can add additional trauma. In contrast, gelatin sponges, currently commonly used as wound closure materials, are only hemostatic and rapidly absorbed postoperatively, and do not provide protection of hard and soft tissue augmentation. Collagen matrix has recently been introduced for keratinized gingival augmentation and has shown encouraging results in preclinical and clinical studies, but more information is needed to confirm its clinical efficacy. Mucograft® Seal is a porcine collagen matrix with a bilayer structure, a dense and slowly absorbing layer and a spongy layer that stabilizes blood clots and allows soft tissue cells to penetrate. Human gingival fibroblasts cultured on Mucograft® were demonstrated to have good proliferative properties and cell viability as scaffold material. In dog extraction sites, preliminary results suggest that the combination of Mucograft® and Bio-Oss Collagen may be an effective method for alveolar ridge preservation. Mucograft® Seal can be used in combination with Bio-Oss Collagen® for alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction.
The research hypothesis is that the use of a collagen matrix to seal the wound in immediate implant placement in aesthetic area will reduce buccal bone resorption and increase the width and thickness of the soft tissue at the implant site.
Therefore, we designed this comparative clinical trial in which patients accept immediate implant placement in aesthetic area. The implant is placed after tooth extraction, and bone graft material Bio-Oss Collagen® is placed in the jump gap, and the wound was closed by different means (collagen matrix or gelatin sponge randomly). The clinical examination, CBCT imaging and histological evaluations were performed to compare the differences in clinical efficacy of the two wound closure methods. The primary outcome is the buccal bone thickness change at the immediate implant site 4 months after surgery.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Beilei Liu, Doctor
- Phone Number: 13061800982
- Email: beilei_liu@outlook.com
Study Locations
-
-
Shanghai
-
Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200011
- Recruiting
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology
-
Contact:
- Jun-Yu Shi, MDS
- Phone Number: 23271073
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are at least 18 years old and in good health;
- Single tooth in the maxillary anterior aesthetic area to be extracted for immediate implant placement;
- The labial bone plate is intact and there is sufficient bone in the apical region to ensure initial stability.
- Healthy intraoral soft tissues and no infection.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Need to place more than 1 implant in the aesthetic area.
- Heavy smokers (> 10 cigarettes/day).
- Patients with physical diseases such as: uncontrolled diabetes (fasting glucose > 7.2 mmol/L, glycosylated hemoglobin > 7%), current intake of bisphosphonate medication, history of head and neck malignancy, history of head and neck radiotherapy, pregnancy or preparation for pregnancy, etc.
- Patients with uncontrolled periodontitis and unstable periodontal status.
- Lateral labial bone plate defect;
- Missing teeth;
- Allergic to titanium;
e. Those who do not wish to participate in this study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Placebo Comparator: Control
|
After tooth extraction, a dental implant is placed immediately.
After implant placement, the gap between implant and the buccal bone wall is filled with Bio-oss collagen.
After guided bone regeneration, patient in the control group receive gelatin sponge for wound closure.
|
Experimental: Collagen matrix
|
After tooth extraction, a dental implant is placed immediately.
After implant placement, the gap between implant and the buccal bone wall is filled with Bio-oss collagen.
After guided bone regeneration, patient in the control group receive collagen matrix (Mucograft Seal) for wound closure.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Thickness of the buccal bone
Time Frame: 4 months after implant surgery
|
Change in labial alveolar bone thickness, including alveolar bone thickness and implant bone powder thickness
|
4 months after implant surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
gingival thickness
Time Frame: 4 months after implant surgery
|
Change of gingival thickness
|
4 months after implant surgery
|
success rate
Time Frame: 4 months after implant surgery
|
success rate of implant
|
4 months after implant surgery
|
Wound healing
Time Frame: 2weeks and 4 months after implant surgery
|
Wound healing status
|
2weeks and 4 months after implant surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20210205.V1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Tooth Decay
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityNot yet recruitingDental Caries | Tooth DecayUnited States
-
Pakistan Institute of Medical SciencesRecruitingTooth DecayPakistan
-
West Coast UniversityCompleted
-
Al-Azhar UniversityCompleted
-
karim mohamedCompleted
-
Al-Azhar UniversityActive, not recruitingDental Caries | Tooth DecayEgypt
-
Universitat Internacional de CatalunyaCompleted
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompleted
-
King Fahad Armed Forces HospitalCompletedDental Decay
Clinical Trials on Immediate implant placement
-
Universidade Católica PortuguesaDanilo FernandesCompleted
-
University of BernNot yet recruitingComplications | Patient Reported Outcome Measures | Cost-Benefit Analysis | Cost-effectiveness | Esthetic Zone | Single Tooth Dental Implant | Single Tooth Lost | Accuracy of Dental Implants | Dimensional Changes | Implant Survival and Success | Frequency of Treatment ProtocolSwitzerland
-
Università Vita-Salute San RaffaeleCompleted
-
Columbia UniversityCompletedGingival Recession | Bone Loss, Alveolar
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityRecruitingJaw, Edentulous, Partially | Acquired Absence of Single ToothChina
-
Cairo UniversityInstitut Straumann AGCompletedDental Implant | Immediate ImplantEgypt
-
Dalia Rasheed IssaCompletedImmediate Implant Placement | Autogenous Tooth Bone Graft | L-PRFEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedBuccal Bone ThicknessEgypt
-
Saint-Joseph UniversityEnrolling by invitationGuided Surgery | Immediate Implant Placement | Immediate TamporizationLebanon
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedImmediate Implants | Esthetic Zone | Labial Bone Dimensional Changes | Without Labial Bone Grafting | With Labial Grafting | Thin Labial Plate of Bone Pre-extractionEgypt