Lifestyle Remodeling in Subjective Memory Complaint (SMC): Brain Imaging and Blood Biochemistry Study

November 12, 2023 updated by: Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

The specific study aims:

  1. To investigate whether the brain function is affected by the past life experiences, such as lifestyle and physiology-related factors in SMC.
  2. To examine whether the lifestyle remodeling could improve SMC's cognitive function and modulate the reactivity of inflammatory factors, leading to significantly slow down the disease progression to MCI or dementia.
  3. To investigate the lasting duration of the intervention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Although there is much evidence showing age-related reduction of cognitive function, many researchers point out a more optimistic viewpoint that aging is not a progressive loss. By remodeling the lifestyle, or/and monitoring the physical factors, the risk to develop dementia could be reduced. The above statements are mostly based on the epidemiological research, while it remains unclear how the aging modulates the brain changes. In previous study, the investigators have found that individuals with subjective memory complaint (SMC) showed altered brain changes in terms of resting-state connectivity when compared to those without SMC. The present study further aims to examine whether the brain function is affected by the past life experiences, such as lifestyle and physiology-related factors in SMC. More importantly, this study aims to clarify whether the lifestyle remodeling could improve SMC's cognitive function and modulate the reactivity of inflammatory factors, leading to significantly slow down the disease progression to MCI or dementia.

In summary, the present study aims to understand how the lifestyle remodeling affects SMC's brain function and biochemical indicators. Before and after the intervention, this study will use neuropsychological tests to assess all the aspects of cognitive functions, use Electroencephalogram to investigate the brain activation patterns, and use biochemical analyses to quantify the reactivity of inflammation, toxic as well as neurotrophic factors. Through the follow-up design, this study also plan to investigate the lasting duration of the intervention and the how the neural reorganization occurs as function of time.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beitou District
      • Taipei City, Beitou District, Taiwan, 11217
        • Taipei Veterans General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age over 50 years old.
  2. Diagnosed with subjective memory complaint (SMC) and with lower cognitive activities and physical activities.
  3. Voluntary to sign the Informed Consent Form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants or first-degree relatives diagnosed with mental diseases.
  2. Participants have history of severe neurological diseases or brain injury led to loss of consciousness.
  3. Participants have diagnosis of cardiovascular disease.
  4. Participants have History of alcohol, Nicotine, or substance dependence.
  5. Participants suffer from visual, hearing degradation (including Hearing aid user).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lifestyle remodeling
Participants will be received 2 phases of intervention of lifestyle remodeling, 3 months for each phase, which contained cognitive stimulating activities and physical activities.
Active Comparator: Does Comparator: regular treatment
Participants in this group would be treated as usual, which contained the healthy education.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Electroencephalogram (EEG) performance.
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
The amplitude, latency of MMN (mismatch negativity), N2, and the P3 components will be used to evaluate the memory and inhibitory control ability. Other EEG time-frequency analysis will be used to examine the changes of different frequency bands, such as theta, alpha, beta, and gamma.
baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
Concentration change from baseline in the blood biochemical indices. (Total Tau, Aβ1-40, Aβ1-42, IL-1b, TNF-a, IL-6, TGF-b, BDNF, insulin, and ApoE4)
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
Blood samples will use an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to assay the concentrations of Tau, Beta Amyloid (Aβ)1-40, Aβ1-42, interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-⍺, Interleukin-6 (IL-6), transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), insulin, etc. The apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4) genotype will also be evaluated.
baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
Change score of the Chinese version Verbal Learning Test (CVVLT).
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
A nine-item of CVVLT (total recall, delayed recall) will be applied to measure the participant's memory ability, with a higher score indicating better performance.
baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
Change score of the WMS-III logical memory test part A.
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
WMS-III logical memory test part A (immediate recall, delayed recall) will be applied to measure the participant's memory ability. The maximum score is 25 for each recall trial, with a higher score indicating better performance.
baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
Change score of the Taylor Complex Figure Test (TCFT).
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
TCFT (immediate recall, delayed recall) will be applied to measure the participant's memory ability. The maximum score is 36 for each recall trial, with a higher score indicating better performance.
baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
Change score of the Digit Span Backward Test.
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
The Digit Span Backwards Task will be applied to measure the participant's working memory ability. A higher score indicating better performance.
baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective memory complaint survey.
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
A 14-item Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire measured memory impairment. The response was restricted to either "Yes" or "No".
baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
Change scores of EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D).
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
The EQ-5D comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression to measure the quality of life. Each dimension has five levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems.
baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
Lifestyle activities survey.
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
This self-report questionnaire measured the frequency of cognitive (e.g. read newspaper, go to museum) and physical activities (e.g.jogging, swimming). Each activity has four levels to rate frequency, with the lower score means a lower frequency on that activity.
baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
Physiological parameter (Blood pressure and blood glucose) survey.
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
The data will be used to evaluate whether lifestyle remodeling intervention regulates the values of the physiological parameters(blood pressure and blood glucose level), further to investigate the association between physiological parameters and cognitive function.
baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
Change score of the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI).
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
CASI will be applied to measure the participant's general cognitive ability. The range of score is 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better performance.
baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
Change score of the Boston Naming Test (BNT).
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
Thirty-item version BNT will be applied to measure the participant's linguistic ability. The maximum score is 25, with a higher score indicating better performance.
baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
Change score of the category Verbal Fluency Test (VFT).
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
The category VFT will be applied to measure the participant's language and executive function, with a higher score indicates better performance.
baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)
Performance changes of the Trail Making Test Form A/B (TMT-A/B).
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)

TMT-A/B will be applied to measure participant's attention and executive function.

The number of seconds to complete each trial and the number of errors would be recorded, with a higher value indicating greater impairment.

baseline, post-treatment (6 months), follow-up (12 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pei-Ning Wang, M.D., Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 19, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 19, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 14, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Subjective Memory Complaint

Clinical Trials on Lifestyle remodeling Intervention

Subscribe