Effects of High Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) in Patients With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

November 21, 2019 updated by: Seda Paskal, Dokuz Eylul University
The aim of this study is to determine the effects of high intensity laser therapy (HILT) in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). This study aims to compare the effects of HILT alone and HILT and therapeutic exercise combination on shoulder pain, ROM, joint position sense (JPS), muscle strength and function.The investigators hypothesized that shoulder pain, ROM, JPS, muscle strength and functionality would improve with both treatments but that HILT combined with exercise would result in better outcomes than HILT alone.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

30 patients with SIS will be randomized into two groups. Pain intensity will be assessed with visual analogue scale (VAS), pain-free and normal range of motion (ROM) with goniometer, joint position sense (JPS) with inclinometer, muscle strenght with hand-held dynamometer, and shoulder functionality with Constant Murley Score (CMS) and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) in a pretest-posttest design. HILT Group (n=15) will receive only HILT for 10 sessions, 3 days a week on alternate days. HILT& Exercise Group (n=15) will receive exercise treatment in addition to HILT for the same duration of time.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed as SIS (≥3 positive of 5 impingement tests: Neer's sign, Hawkins and Kennedy, Empty Can, painful arc of abduction and external rotation resistance tests)
  • No history of shoulder injury and/or shoulder symptoms requiring treatment other than SIS for the last 1 year
  • Shoulder pain less than 7/10 of Visual Analogue Scale
  • Being able to elevate the shoulder over 140 degrees

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of upper extremity fracture, shoulder surgery
  • Frozen shoulder
  • Full-thickness rotator cuff (RC) tear
  • Shoulder instability, systemic musculoskeletal disease
  • Shoulder pain with cervical spine motion,
  • Having any of the contraindications of HILT.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HILT Group
HILT Group (n=15)
HILT will be performed with BTL 6000 High Intensity Laser (London, UK) which is a therapeutic non-invasive neodymium: yttrium aluminum garnet laser that has a pulsating waveform and 1064 nm wavelength, 12 Watt maximum power and has the ability to penetrate 12 cm.
Other Names:
  • BTL 6000 High Intensity Laser (London, UK)
Experimental: HILT & EXERCISE Group
HILT&Exercise Group (n=15)
HILT&Exercise group will receive exercise therapy right after they receive HILT. Both groups will receive treatment for 3 days a week, on alternate days and totally 10 sessions. Patients will be asked not to use analgesic medication throughout the treatment period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Evaluation:Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Rest and activity pain of the shoulder will be measured on a 10-cm VAS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Higher scores mean worse outcome.
4 weeks
Shoulder Range of Motion Evaluation
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Active and passive ROM will be evaluated with universal goniometer (Baseline®, Fabrication End Inc, New York, USA).
4 weeks
Pain-free Range of Motion Evaluation
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Pain-free ROM will be assessed by measuring pain-free ROM for active shoulder elevation in scapular plane with universal goniometer. While sitting on a chair with back support, patients performed elevation with their thumbs pointing up. One degree below the angle where the patient first experienced pain was recorded.
4 weeks
Muscle Strength Evaluation
Time Frame: 4 weeks
A hand-held dynamometer (HHD) (Power track II, J Tech, New York, USA) will be used to assess muscle strength. Before the evaluations test order will be randomized for lower trapezius (LT), middle trapezius (MT), upper trapezius (UT), serratus anterior (SA), supraspinatus (SupraSp), subscapularis (SubSc), infraspinatus&teres minor (IS&TM) muscles.
4 weeks
Shoulder Joint Position Sense (JPS) Evaluation
Time Frame: 4 weeks
A bubble inclinometer (Baseline®, Fabrication End Inc, NewYork, USA) will be used to assess active shoulder JPS. The inclinometer will be attached to an elastic strip via a velcro-band and placed on proximal humerus for abduction and on wrist for rotations. Shoulder JPS in abduction direction will be evaluated while patient sitting on a chair without back support at the angle of 100°, 19 internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER); while patient lying supine, at the angles of 45° IR and 75° ER.
4 weeks
Shoulder Function and Disability Evaluation
Time Frame: 4 weeks

The Turkish version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) will be used to evaluate shoulder disability level. Items in the index are presented on a numerical rating scale (0 indicates no pain/no difficulty, 10 indicates worst pain/most difficulty). Higher score indicates greater disability.

The Turkish version of the Constant-Murley Shoulder Score (CMS) will be used to evaluate shoulder function. It is a 100-points-scale composed of pain (15 points), activities of daily living (ADL) (20 points), active ROM (40 points) and strenght (25 points) subgroups. The total score is classified as excellent (90-100), good (80-89), moderate (70-79) and weak (<70).

4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sevgi Sevi Yeşilyaprak, Assoc. Prof. PT., Dokuz Eylül University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 5, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 6, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

May 27, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 25, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

Clinical Trials on HILT

Subscribe