Imaging Study to Investigate Safety and Diagnostic Performance of 18F rhPSMA 7.3 PET Ligand in Suspected Prostate Cancer Recurrence

September 10, 2025 updated by: Blue Earth Diagnostics

A Prospective, Phase 3, Multi Center, Single-arm, Imaging Study Investigating the Safety and Diagnostic Performance of rhPSMA 7.3 (18F) PET Ligand in Men With Suspected Prostate Cancer Recurrence Based on Elevated PSA Following Prior Therapy (SPOTLIGHT)

A prospective, Phase 3, multi center, single-arm, imaging study investigating the safety and diagnostic performance of rhPSMA 7.3 (18F) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) ligand in men with suspected prostate cancer recurrence based on elevated Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) following prior therapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary objective of this study was to assess the patient-level correct detection rate (CDR) and region-level positive predictive value (PPV) of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) positron emission tomography (PET) for biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer using histopathology or imaging as a standard of truth (SoT).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

391

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Turku, Finland, FI-20520
        • Turku University Hospital
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6532
        • CWZ
      • Veldhoven, Netherlands, 5504 DB
        • Máxima MC
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
        • Tower Urology
      • Orange, California, United States, 92868
        • University of California Irvine Medical Center (UCIMC)
      • Santa Monica, California, United States, 90403
        • John Wayne Cancer Institute
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory University Hospital
      • Austell, Georgia, United States, 30342
        • Northside Hospital
    • Illinois
      • Evanston, Illinois, United States, 60201
        • Northshore University Healthsystem
      • Maywood, Illinois, United States, 60153
        • Loyola University Medical Center
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University
      • Towson, Maryland, United States, 21204
        • Chesapeake Urology Research Associates
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan Ann Arbor
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
        • Karmanos Cancer Institute
    • Missouri
      • St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine
    • New York
      • Jamaica, New York, United States, 11432
        • Queens Hospital Center (QHC - Queens Cancer Center
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mount Sinai Faculty Practice Associates
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11794
        • Stony Brook University
      • The Bronx, New York, United States, 10461
        • Montefiore Hospital
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27701
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19004
        • MidLantic urology
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77054
        • MD Anderson Hospital
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Urology San Antonio
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
        • University of Virginia - Health Science Center
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23502
        • Virginia Oncology Associates

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is male and aged >18 years old.
  2. History of localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate with prior curative intent treatment.
  3. An elevated PSA, clinically suspicious for biochemically recurrent disease:

    • Following Radical Prostatectomy: PSA >0.2 ng/mL
    • Following Radiotherapy: nadir +2 ng/mL.
  4. Potentially eligible for salvage therapy with curative intent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who are planned to have an x-ray contrast agent or other PET radiotracer <24 hours prior to the PET scan.
  2. Patients currently receiving Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients
Single intravenous administration of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) for PET Scan
Radioligand for PET CT scanning
Other Names:
  • flotufolastat F18
Imaging scan with radioligand
Other Names:
  • PET scan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-level CDR and Region-level PPV of rhPSMA7.3 (18F) PET for BCR of Prostate Cancer Using Histopathology or Imaging as a SoT
Time Frame: Conventional images within 90 days of rhPSMA7.3 (18F) PET, followed by biopsy within 60 days post-PET scan or confirmatory imaging within 90 days post-PET scan
The CDR was defined as the percentage of all patients scanned who had at least one TP lesion (localized correspondence between rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET imaging and the reference standard) regardless of any coexisting FP findings. When determining the region-level PPV, all rhPSMA7.3 (18F) PET-positive regions (maximum of three per patient) were categorized as TP or FP regions using histopathology or imaging.
Conventional images within 90 days of rhPSMA7.3 (18F) PET, followed by biopsy within 60 days post-PET scan or confirmatory imaging within 90 days post-PET scan

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-level CDR and Region-level PPV of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET in Patients Who Had Negative Baseline Conventional Imaging
Time Frame: Conventional images within 90 days of rhPSMA7.3 (18F) PET, followed by biopsy within 60 days post-PET scan or confirmatory imaging within 90 days post-PET scan

Patient-level CDR was defined as the percentage of all patients scanned who had at least one TP lesion (localized correspondence between rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET imaging and the reference standard) regardless of any co-existing FP findings.

Region-Level PPV is defined as the regions which are true positive out of all regions with positive lesions.

Conventional images within 90 days of rhPSMA7.3 (18F) PET, followed by biopsy within 60 days post-PET scan or confirmatory imaging within 90 days post-PET scan
Patient-level CDR and Region-level PPV of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET for Recurrence in Those Patients With and Without Reference Standard Histopathology Available
Time Frame: Conventional images within 90 days of rhPSMA7.3 (18F) PET, followed by biopsy within 60 days post-PET scan or confirmatory imaging within 90 days post-PET scan

Patient-level CDR was defined as the percentage of all patients scanned who had at least one TP lesion (localized correspondence between rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET imaging and the reference standard) regardless of any co-existing FP findings.

Region-Level PPV is defined as the regions which are true positive out of all regions with positive lesions.

Conventional images within 90 days of rhPSMA7.3 (18F) PET, followed by biopsy within 60 days post-PET scan or confirmatory imaging within 90 days post-PET scan
Patient-level CDR of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET Stratified by PSA Level
Time Frame: Conventional images within 90 days of rhPSMA7.3 (18F) PET, followed by biopsy within 60 days post-PET scan or confirmatory imaging within 90 days post-PET scan
Patient-level CDR was defined as the percentage of all patients scanned who had at least one TP lesion (localized correspondence between rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET imaging and the reference standard) regardless of any co-existing FP findings. The last PSA level before the PET scan will be used to stratify the patients
Conventional images within 90 days of rhPSMA7.3 (18F) PET, followed by biopsy within 60 days post-PET scan or confirmatory imaging within 90 days post-PET scan
CDR of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET in the Following Regions: Prostate/Prostate Bed, Pelvic Lymph Nodes, Other
Time Frame: Conventional images within 90 days of rhPSMA7.3 (18F) PET, followed by biopsy within 60 days post-PET scan or confirmatory imaging within 90 days post-PET scan
Patient-level CDR was defined as the percentage of all patients scanned who had at least one TP lesion (localized correspondence between rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET imaging and the reference standard) regardless of any co-existing FP findings. The analysis was performed for each region and for each of the blinded independent readers
Conventional images within 90 days of rhPSMA7.3 (18F) PET, followed by biopsy within 60 days post-PET scan or confirmatory imaging within 90 days post-PET scan
Percentage of Patients in Whom rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET Imaging Results Changed the Intended Patient Management (Major and Other Changes)
Time Frame: Conventional images within 90 days of rhPSMA7.3 (18F) PET, followed by biopsy within 60 days post-PET scan or confirmatory imaging within 90 days post-PET scan
This analysis used patients in the EAP who had documented patient management plans in the EDC before and after the rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET scan
Conventional images within 90 days of rhPSMA7.3 (18F) PET, followed by biopsy within 60 days post-PET scan or confirmatory imaging within 90 days post-PET scan
Reader Kappa Statistics of rhPSMA7.3 (18F) Scan Interpretation by the Blinded Independent Readers
Time Frame: PET Scan on Day 1
The Cohen's kappa statistic will be calculated to assess pairwise agreement between any 2 blinded independent readers
PET Scan on Day 1
Region-level PPV of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET Stratified by PSA Level
Time Frame: Conventional images within 90 days of rhPSMA7.3 (18F) PET, followed by biopsy within 60 days post-PET scan or confirmatory imaging within 90 days post-PET scan
Region-Level PPV is defined as the regions which are true positive out of all regions with positive lesions.. The last PSA level before the rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET scan was used to stratify patients.
Conventional images within 90 days of rhPSMA7.3 (18F) PET, followed by biopsy within 60 days post-PET scan or confirmatory imaging within 90 days post-PET scan
Region-level PPV of rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) PET for Recurrence in Those Patients With and Without Reference Standard Histopathology Available
Time Frame: Conventional images within 90 days of rhPSMA7.3 (18F) PET, followed by biopsy within 60 days post-PET scan or confirmatory imaging within 90 days post-PET scan
Region-Level PPV is defined as the regions which are true positive out of all regions with positive lesions. The data are analysed by whether the patients have had histopathology as reference standard.
Conventional images within 90 days of rhPSMA7.3 (18F) PET, followed by biopsy within 60 days post-PET scan or confirmatory imaging within 90 days post-PET scan

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 4, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 28, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 28, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on rhPSMA-7.3 (18F) Injection

Subscribe