Investigating the Effects of QVM149 on MRI Ventilation Defects (XPERTT)

November 29, 2021 updated by: Dr. Grace Parraga

Xenon MRI Probing vEntilation Response to Triple Therapy (QVM149)

The purpose of this study is to compare treatment with QVM149, an inhaler that contains three types of asthma medications compared to an inhaler that contains two types of asthma medications. Both inhalers contain an inhaled corticosteroid, which reduces inflammation in the lungs, and a medication that helps to open up the airways. The investigational inhaler, QVM149, contains a third medication that also works to open up the airways. The investigators will measure the difference in these two treatments with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a special technique using xenon gas to show how gas spreads in the lungs. In healthy lungs, the gas fills the lungs evenly, but in unhealthy lungs, the gas may fill the lungs unevenly and they will appear patchy. The patchy areas are called ventilation defects. A CT of the chest will be done to assess the structure of the lungs. The investigators will also use lung function testing and questionnaires to evaluate the differences between these therapies.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Detailed Description

A single site, two arm, randomized, open-label study in participants with asthma, who demonstrate visually obvious ventilation defects despite being on ICS/LABA was chosen to evaluate the capability of QVM149 150/50/160 μg once daily as compared to high dose dual therapy (ICS/LABA) to improve ventilation heterogeneity. According to the design of the study, hyperpolarized Xenon-129 (129Xe) will be used to measure ventilation defects in asthma participants as ventilation defect percent (VDP). A low-dose chest CT acquired within a few minutes of MRI will provide a way to measure both airway and parenchymal abnormalities. The selection of the QVM149 150/50/160 μg was made in order to keep the ICS dose equipotent to baseline therapy and to the active comparator arm and to directly compare the addition of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) versus continuing the therapy with high dose dual therapy (ICS/LABA).

This study will be a single site, two arm, randomized, open-label study with the following treatment:

  • Treatment A: 2-week treatment with Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium/Mometasone 150/50/160 μg delivered as powder in hard capsules via Breezhaler, a breath-activated device which will deliver a specific dose of medication.
  • Treatment B: 2-week treatment with high dose dual therapy (ICS/LABA) in any approved drug formulation and delivery device. (Continue receiving high dose ICS/LABA therapy at the same dose and in the same formulation as at baseline).

The study will consist of a screening/inclusion period of 1-5 days, followed by a treatment period of 14 days. The evaluation team including MRI observers will be blinded to treatment.

At Visit 101, informed consent will be obtained before any study related assessments or procedures are performed. Asthma medications and eligibility criteria will be reviewed. Furthermore, at Visit 101, safety assessments including electrocardiography (ECG), hematology, blood chemistry, urinalysis, and spirometry to test reversibility will be performed. Once the above criteria are met, participants will move on to Visit 102.

At Visit 102 all additional assessments, including MRI to detect visually obvious ventilation defects, low-dose chest CT, and Pulmonary Function Test assessments including spirometry, plethysmography, Lung Clearance Index (LCI) and Forced Oscillation Technique (FOT) will be conducted. Participants who qualify will then be randomized and entered into the 14 days treatment period and continue with the assessments according to study protocol. Participants will be supplied with open-label Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium/ Mometasone 150/50/160 μg o.d. delivered as powder in hard capsules via Breezhaler or continue with their previously prescribed high dose dual therapy (ICS/LABA) in any approved drug formulation and delivery device, which will be used during the study treatment period and stopped at Visit 201.

Upon completion of the study treatment period at Visit 201, all participants will undergo post-treatment assessments, including MRI, pre- and post-salbutamol pulmonary function testing including spirometry, plethysmography, LCI, FOT, and asthma questionnaires.

A final visit, Visit 301 will be scheduled for safety assessments. All participants will undergo vital signs, spirometry, ECG, bloodwork and urinalysis.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5B7
        • Robarts Research Insitute; The University of Western Ontario; London Health Sciences Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent must be directly obtained from legally competent participants before any study- related assessment is performed.
  • Male and female adult participant ≥ 18 years of age and ≤ 80 years of age.
  • Participants with a confirmed clinical diagnosis of asthma by a respirologist for a period of at least 6 months prior to Visit 101.
  • Participants who demonstrate reversibility in FEV1 by one of :

    1. Increase in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of ≥ 12% and 200 ml 15 to 30 minutes after administration of 400μg salbutamol at Visit 101
    2. Documented increase in FEV1 of ≥ 12% and 200 ml 15 to 30 minutes after administration of 400μg salbutamol in past 24 months
    3. Documented increase in FEV1 of ≥ 12% and 200 ml after treatment for asthma (e.g. treatment with ICS) in past 24 months
    4. Documented positive methacholine challenge in past 24 months
  • Participants who have used high dose dual therapy (ICS/LABA) for asthma for at least 3 months and at a stable dose equivalent to high dose ICS for at least 1 month prior to Visit 101 (please refer to Table 1-1 for ICS dosages).
  • Participants with visually obvious MRI ventilation defects at Visit 102.
  • Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 of < 85% of the predicted normal value for the participant after withholding bronchodilators prior to spirometry at Visit 101.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants meeting contraindications for undergoing an MRI such as participants with MRI-sensitive implants, tattoos with MRI-sensitive dye and severe claustrophobia.
  • Currently smoking or vaping any substance (e.g. nicotine, cannabis) at Visit 101 or within 12 months of visit 101.
  • Ex-smoker of nicotine or cannabis with a smoking history of ≥ 10 pack years or 20 joint years (Note: 1 pack is equivalent to 20 cigarettes. 10 pack years = 1 pack /day x 10 yrs., or ½ pack/day x 20 yrs. 1 joint year is equivalent to 1 joint/day x 1 year)
  • Participants diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Diagnoses of asthma- COPD overlap syndrome may be eligible.
  • Participants who have had an asthma attack/exacerbation requiring systemic steroids, hospitalization and/or emergency room visit within 6 weeks of Visit 101 or a respiratory tract infection requiring antibiotics within 4 weeks prior to Visit 101. If participants experience an asthma attack/exacerbation requiring systemic steroids or hospitalization or emergency room visit between Visit 101 and Visit 201, they will be withdrawn from the study but may be re-screened 4 weeks after recovery from the exacerbation.
  • Participants treated with a LAMA for asthma within 3 months prior to Visit 101.
  • Participants with narrow-angle glaucoma, symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) or bladder- neck obstruction or severe renal impairment or urinary retention. BPH participants who are stable on treatment can be considered.
  • Participants with a history of chronic lung diseases other than asthma, including (but not limited to) sarcoidosis, interstitial lung disease, cystic fibrosis, clinically significant bronchiectasis and active tuberculosis.
  • Use of other investigational drugs within 30 days (e.g. small molecules) / or until the expected pharmacodynamic effect has returned to baseline (e.g. biologics), whichever is longer.
  • History of hypersensitivity to any of the study treatments or its excipients or to other drugs of similar chemical classes.
  • Participants with paroxysmal (e.g., intermittent) atrial fibrillation are excluded. Participants with persistent atrial fibrillation as defined by continuous atrial fibrillation for at least 6 months and controlled with a rate control strategy (i.e., selective beta blockers, calcium channel blocker, digoxin or ablation therapy) for at least 6 months may be considered for inclusion. In such participants, atrial fibrillation must be present at Visit 101 with a resting ventricular rate < 100/min.
  • Participants with a history of myocardial infarction within 12 months prior to Visit 101.
  • Concomitant use of agents known to prolong the QT interval unless it can be discontinued for the duration of study. Decisions about the discontinuation of such agents will be made between the Qualified Investigator and participant.
  • Participants with a history of long QT syndrome or whose QTc measured at Visit 101 (Fridericia method) is prolonged (> 450 msec for males and > 460 msec for females). These participants may not be rescreened.
  • Participants with a history of lactose intolerance and hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or its excipients, or to similar drugs within the class including untoward reactions to sympathomimetic amines or inhaled medication or any component thereof.
  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women, where pregnancy is defined as the state of a female after conception and until the termination of gestation, confirmed by a positive human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) laboratory test.
  • Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using highly effective methods of contraception during dosing of study treatment and follow-up period. Highly effective contraception methods include:

    1. True sexual abstinence with male partner(s) (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participant). Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptom-thermal, post ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception.
    2. Female sterilization (have had surgical tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or tubal ligation at least six weeks before taking study treatment. In case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment.
    3. Vasectomized male partner(s) (at least 6 months prior to Visit 101).
    4. Use hormonal contraception with failure rate <1% (e.g. oral contraceptive pill, Depo-Provera™ injections, Erva Patch™ or Nuvaring™).
    5. Placement of an MRI safe intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS).

In case of use of hormonal contraception, women should have been stable on the same pharmacological agent for a minimum of 3 months before Visit 101. Women are considered post-menopausal and not of child-bearing potential if they have had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea with an appropriate clinical profile (e.g. age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms) or have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy) or tubal ligation at least six weeks ago. In the case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow-up hormone level assessment is she considered not of childbearing potential.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Treatment - QVM149
Participants will complete a two week treatment with QVM149 (indacaterol acetate/glycopyrronium bromide/mometasone furoate) 150/50/160 μg delivered as powder in hard capsules via Breezhaler, a breath-activated device which will deliver a specific dose of medication via inhalation.
QVM149 is an investigational drug consisting of 150μg indacaterol acetate, 50μg glycopyrronium bromide and 160μg mometasone furoate. The drug is delivered as powder in hard capsules via Breezhaler, a breath-activated device which will deliver a specific dose of medication
Other Names:
  • indacaterol acetate/glycopyrronium bromide/mometasone furoate
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control
Participants will continue their clinically prescribed treatment with a high dose dual therapy of Inhaled Corticosteroid (ICS)/Long-Acting Beta2-Agonist (LABA) in any approved drug formulation and delivery device for the treatment period of two weeks. (Participants will continue receiving high dose ICS/LABA therapy at the same dose and in the same formulation as at baseline).
High dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) in any approved drug formulation and delivery device.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline airway function measured using 129-Xenon MRI ventilation defect percent at the end of 2 weeks of treatment with QVM149 150/50/160 μg once daily
Time Frame: Day 0 and 14
Change in VDP
Day 0 and 14
Difference in change from baseline airway function measured using 129-Xenon MRI ventilation defect percent after 2 weeks use of QVM149 150/50/160 μg once daily compared to high dose dual therapy (ICS/LABA)
Time Frame: Day 0 and 14
Difference in change in VDP
Day 0 and 14

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Explore univariate correlation and linear regression of MRI ventilation defect percent and forced expiration volume in one second.
Time Frame: Day 14
The relationship between ventilation defect percent and forced expiration volume in one second will be assessed using univariate correlation analysis and linear regression. This information gives insight into the relationship between pulmonary function and structure.
Day 14
Explore univariate correlation and linear regression of MRI ventilation defect percent and forced vital capacity
Time Frame: Day 14
The relationship between ventilation defect percent and forced vital capacity will be assessed using univariate correlation analysis and linear regression. This information gives insight into the relationship between pulmonary function and structure.
Day 14
Explore univariate correlation and linear regression of MRI ventilation defect percent and lung volumes
Time Frame: Day 14
The relationship between ventilation defect percent and lung volumes will be assessed using univariate correlation analysis and linear regression. This information gives insight into the relationship between pulmonary function and structure.
Day 14
Explore univariate correlation and linear regression of MRI ventilation defect percent and forced oscillation technique
Time Frame: Day 14
The relationship between ventilation defect percent and forced oscillation technique will be assessed using univariate correlation analysis and linear regression. This information gives insight into the relationship between pulmonary function, structure and inflammation.
Day 14
Explore univariate correlation and linear regression of MRI ventilation defect percent and lung clearance index
Time Frame: Day 14
The relationship between ventilation defect percent and lung clearance index will be assessed using univariate correlation analysis and linear regression. This information gives insight into the relationship between pulmonary function and structure.
Day 14
Explore univariate correlation and linear regression of MRI ventilation defect percent and asthma control as measured by the Asthma Control Questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 14
The relationship between ventilation defect percent and asthma control, as measured by the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6) will be assessed using a univariate correlation analysis and linear regression. The ACQ-6 is scored from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating more uncontrolled asthma.
Day 14
Explore univariate correlation and linear regression of MRI ventilation defect percent and asthma-related quality of life as measured by the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 14
The relationship between ventilation defect percent and asthma-related quality of life as measured by the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire with Standardised Activities (AQLQ(S)) will be assessed using a univariate correlation analysis and linear regression. The AQLQ(S) is scored from 1-7, with lower scores indicating more severe impairment.
Day 14
Explore univariate correlation and linear regression of MRI ventilation defect percent and daily life and perceived well-being as measured by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 14
The relationship between ventilation defect percent and daily life and perceived well-being as measured by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) will be assessed using univariate correlation analysis and linear regression. The SGRQ is scored from 0-100 with higher scores indicating more limitations.
Day 14
Change from baseline forced expiration volume in one second
Time Frame: Day 0 and 14
Indicator of pulmonary function
Day 0 and 14
Difference in change from baseline forced expiration volume in one second after use of QVM149 compared to high dose dual therapy.
Time Frame: Day 0 and 14
Indicator of pulmonary function
Day 0 and 14
Change from baseline forced vital capacity
Time Frame: Day 0 and 14
Indicator of pulmonary function
Day 0 and 14
Difference in change from baseline forced vital capacity after use of QVM149 compared to high dose dual therapy.
Time Frame: Day 0 and 14
Indicator of pulmonary function
Day 0 and 14
Change from baseline residual volume.
Time Frame: Day 0 and 14
Indicator of pulmonary function
Day 0 and 14
Difference in change from baseline residual volume after use of QVM149 compared to high dose dual therapy.
Time Frame: Day 0 and 14
Indicator of pulmonary function
Day 0 and 14
Change from baseline total lung capacity.
Time Frame: Day 0 and 14
Indicator of pulmonary function
Day 0 and 14
Difference in change from baseline total lung capacity after use of QVM149 compared to high dose dual therapy.
Time Frame: Day 0 and 14
Indicator of pulmonary function
Day 0 and 14
Change from baseline forced oscillation technique
Time Frame: Day 0 and 14
Indicator of pulmonary function and inflammation
Day 0 and 14
Difference in change from baseline forced oscillation technique after use of QVM149 compared to high dose dual therapy.
Time Frame: Day 0 and 14
Indicator of pulmonary function and inflammation
Day 0 and 14
Change from baseline lung clearance index
Time Frame: Day 0 and 14
Indicator of pulmonary function
Day 0 and 14
Difference in change from baseline lung clearance index after use of QVM149 compared to high dose dual therapy.
Time Frame: Day 0 and 14
Indicator of pulmonary function
Day 0 and 14
Change from baseline in asthma control
Time Frame: Day 0 and 14
Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6) is used to evaluate asthma control. The ACQ-6 is scored from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating more severely uncontrolled asthma.
Day 0 and 14
Difference in change from baseline in asthma control after use of QVM149 compared to high dose dual therapy.
Time Frame: Day 0 and 14
Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6) is used to evaluate asthma control. The ACQ-6 is scored from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating more severely uncontrolled asthma.
Day 0 and 14
Change from baseline in asthma-related quality of life
Time Frame: Day 0 and 14
Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire with Standardised Activities (AQLQ(S)) evaluates asthma-related quality of life. The AQLQ(S) is scored from 1-7, with lower scores indicating more severe impairment.
Day 0 and 14
Difference in change from baseline in asthma-related quality of life after use of QVM149 compared to high dose dual therapy.
Time Frame: Day 0 and 14
Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire with Standardised Activities (AQLQ(S)) evaluates asthma-related quality of life. The AQLQ(S) is scored from 1-7, with lower scores indicating more severe impairment.
Day 0 and 14
Change from baseline in daily life and perceived well-being as measured by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 0 and 14
Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire with Standardised Activities (AQLQ(S)) evaluates asthma-related quality of life. The AQLQ(S) is scored from 1-7, with lower scores indicating more severe impairment.
Day 0 and 14
Difference in change from baseline in daily life and perceived well-being as measured by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire after use of QVM149 compared to high dose dual therapy.
Time Frame: Day 0 and 14
Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire with Standardised Activities (AQLQ(S)) evaluates asthma-related quality of life. The AQLQ(S) is scored from 1-7, with lower scores indicating more severe impairment.
Day 0 and 14

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 20, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on QVM149

3
Subscribe