Balance Training With Stroboscopic Vision

December 20, 2019 updated by: DAVID CRUZ DÍAZ, University of Jaen

Influence of Stroboscopic Vision on Balance in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability

Balance training with stroboscopic vision in patients with chronic ankle instability.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study was a single-blinded randomized controlled trial with two intervention groups consisted in multimodal balance training, multimodal balance training in addition to stroboscopic glasses and control group who received no intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Jaen, Spain, 23071
        • University of Jaén

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a previous episode of ankle sprain in at least 6 months before the beginning of the study
  • a score of 25 or less in the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool
  • no history of others musculoskeletal injuries in the lower limbs

Exclusion Criteria:

  • an acute ankle sprain within the last six weeks
  • Recent lower limb surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Neuromuscular training

Neuromuscular training consisting of:

  • Single limb balance task.
  • Balance training on an unstable surface.
  • Hop drills.
This intervention consisted of a supervised multimodal exercise protocol addressing different aspects of balance including static and dynamic tasks on the injured ankle. The training program comprised 6 exercises that were progressively adapted depending on the patient's execution controlled by an expert physiotherapist
EXPERIMENTAL: Stroboscopic glasses group

This group performed the same neuromuscular training with the addition of stroboscopic glasses during the training performance.

  • Single limb balance task.
  • Balance training on unstable surfaces.
  • Hop drills.
Patients included in this group performed the same protocol described in the balance training group with the addition of the stroboscopic glasses during the intervention.
NO_INTERVENTION: Control group
This group received no intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ankle range of motion
Time Frame: From baseline to six weeks.
Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion was assessed by the weight-bearing lunge test. The patient is positioned in a standing position facing a wall with the involved foot parallel with a tape measure which has been attached to the floor and the opposite leg placed behind in a tandem stance. A forward lunge is performed until the anterior knee tries to make contact with the wall with the heel firmly planted on the ground.
From baseline to six weeks.
Dynamic balance
Time Frame: From baseline to six weeks.
Dynamic balance has been measured by a simplified version of the Star Excursion Balance Test where the anterior, posteromedial and posterolateral reach directions were collected for statistical analysis.
From baseline to six weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-reported instability and function
Time Frame: From baseline to six weeks.
To determine the severity of ankle instability the Cumberland ankle instability tool. This questionnaire is a nine items questionnaire ranged from 0 to 30 (0 related with severe impairment and 30 no subjective instability feeling) and has been reported to be a valid tool with high internal consistency and reliability.
From baseline to six weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 2, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 10, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 20, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 24, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 24, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UJASB

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Proprioceptive Disorders

Clinical Trials on Neuromuscular training

3
Subscribe