The Effects of Exercise on Sleep and Brain Health

March 31, 2022 updated by: Michael Brandon Westover, Massachusetts General Hospital
Brain health and cognitive functioning can be affected by aging. Exercise is a potentially effective method for promoting "successful brain aging" by improving cardiovascular fitness, brain function and possibly sleep quality. This project will measure the effects of exercise on brain health and attempt to develop a better way to track brain health, by measuring brain activity during sleep.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

There exists a critical need to develop biomarkers of brain age and for scientifically proven interventions to improve brain health. Previously, a machine learning algorithm, the Brain Age Index (BAI), was developed to predict brain age (BA) based on 510 features derived from an overnight sleep EEG. The algorithm reports how old an individual's sleeping brain activity "looks", called the "brain age" (BA), and compares this with the chronological age (CA). The difference is the BAI: BAI = BA-CA. Prior work suggests that patients with significant neurological or psychiatric disease or hypertension and diabetes exhibit a mean excess brain age, or "brain age index" (BAI), of 4 and 3.5 years relative to healthy controls. Moreover, it has been shown that high BAI is an independent predictor of mortality. Each extra year of BAI yields a 3.3% relative increase in the risk of death. Work from other groups suggest that exercise is potentially effective for promoting "successful brain aging".

Studies of exercise effects on cognition include a metanalysis of 18 prior studies that analyzed the results of exercise on cognitive function in older adults. It was found that aerobic fitness training improved performance across several cognitive domains, including executive function, cognitive control, spatial processing, and processing speed, with an average improvement across studies and across all domains of 0.5 standard deviations relative to controls. Improvement was greatest for executive and control processes. The degree of improvement was also related to the length of the fitness-training intervention, duration of training sessions, and gender (females appeared to benefit more). Studies of exercise effects on brain structure include a prior study that enrolled 35 older adults (14 with Mild Cognitive Impairment, 16 healthy controls) to participate in a 12-week moderate-intensity walking program. Subjects' VO2max increased by an average of 8.49%. The degree to which cardiorespiratory fitness (V̇O2peak) improved due to the intervention was strongly positively correlated with widespread changes in cortical thickness. Taken together, these and other studies suggest that aerobic exercise may be an effective intervention to counteract cortical atrophy due to aging and disease and might provide protection against future cognitive decline in at-risk older adults.

This study hypothesizes that cognitive performance will increase after 12 weeks of regular exercise (1a), EEG-based BAI will be lower after 12 weeks of regular exercise (1b), and improvements of cognitive measures are predictable from changes in BAI (1c). Additionally, it is hypothesized that an excess BAI will correlate with poor sleep quality, higher pre-existing comorbidities, poor diet, and small social network (2). Sedentary subjects who undergo the 12-week exercise training program are anticipated to show measurable improvements in EEG-based brain age and cognitive function, and that the degree of improvement will be related to the degree of improvement in aerobic fitness. This study will provide preliminary data to support a larger and longer longitudinal study designed to 1) Clinically validate novel, low-cost, and patient-friendly EEG-based biomarkers of brain health; and 2) Assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at preserving and improving brain health and ultimately extending healthspan.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Sedentary (≤ two exercise sessions per week for the past 6 months)
  2. Aged 50 to 75 years old
  3. Cleared by primary care physician or other personal physician to participate in a 12-week moderate-intensity walking exercise program. Clearance can be provided to one of the study investigators either verbally or in writing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of neurological illness (e.g. poorly controlled epilepsy with >1 seizure per month in the last 6mo, stroke with residual motor language deficits, Multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, clinically diagnosed dementia [defined as score <26 on the Mini-Mental State Examination], head trauma in the preceding 6-months with continued cognitive symptoms, cerebral palsy, brain tumor, normal-pressure hydrocephalus, HIV infection, or Huntington's disease)
  2. Untreated Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) Axis I disorders (i.e., severe depressive symptoms, substance abuse or dependence)
  3. Impaired activities of daily living (ADLs) measured by the Lawton and Brody Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale.
  4. Inability to safely exercise or perform any of the tests
  5. Inability to perform the cognitive tests due to lack of English proficiency
  6. Known diagnosis of severe sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15/hour of sleep)
  7. Subject fails Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET), i.e. develops symptoms such as shortness of breath, chest pain, palpitations, lightheadedness, or syncope during CPET testing
  8. Patients with a pacemaker or an automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 12-week Moderate-Intensity Exercise Program

Exercise intervention: Participants will complete 57 total sessions of moderate-intensity exercise (walking while tracking heart rate) over 12 weeks. Exercise intensity, frequency, and session duration will increase during the first 4 weeks of the intervention until participants are completing five (5) sessions weekly and walking for 30 min each session at 60-75% of Heart Rate Reserve (HRR) (moderate-intensity exercise), as follows:

Week 1: Three sessions, lasting ≥ 15 minutes, at 50-75% of HRR; Week 2: Four sessions, lasting ≥ 20 minutes, at 50-75% of HRR; Week 3: Five sessions, lasting ≥ 30 minutes, at 50-75% of HRR; Weeks 4-12: Five sessions, lasting ≥ 30 minutes, at 60-75% of HRR

See description of study arm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in EEG-based Brain Age (as measured via the Brain Age Index algorithm) after a 12-week aerobic exercise program.
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks

The Brain Age Index (BAI) algorithm reports how old an individual's sleeping brain activity "looks", called the "brain age" (BA), and compares this with the chronological age (CA). The difference is the Brain Age Index (BAI), which is calculated by subtracting the Chronological Age (CA) from the calculated Brain Age (BA): BAI = BA-CA.

A higher BAI can reflect worse clinical outcomes (e.g. increase mortality risk) while a lower BAI can reflect better clinical outcomes.

Baseline, 12 weeks
Change from baseline in cognitive performance (as measured via the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox Cognition battery) after a 12-week aerobic exercise program.
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
The NIH Toolbox Cognition battery is a composite of 7 tests [Picture Vocabulary (PV), Reading Test (RT), Flanker, Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS), Picture Sequence Memory (PSM), List Sorting (LS), Pattern Comparison (PC)] assessing language, receptive vocabulary, executive function, attention, working/short-term/episodic memory, cognitive flexibility, processing speed, prior education, verbal intelligence. Uncorrected, Age-corrected, and Fully-Corrected scores (mean =100,100,50 and StdDev=15,15,10 respectively) are calculated for each test. Composite scores are given for Fluid, Crystallized, and overall Cognitive Function. The Fluid Composite Score is derived by averaging the std. scores of the Flanker, DCCS, PSM, LS and PC tests. The Crystallized Composite Score is derived by averaging the std. scores of the PV & RT. The Cognitive Function Composite Score is derived by averaging the Fluid & Crystallized std. scores. Higher scores indicate higher levels of cognitive functioning.
Baseline, 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Association between brain age index (BAI) and sleep quality (as measured via a home sleep EEG monitoring device).
Time Frame: Weeks 1-12
EEG signals will be collected via a home sleep monitoring device (Prodigy Sleep System) - a portable, wireless, forehead-mounted monitor that utilizes frontal electrodes. From the EEG, sleep depth and fragmentation (markers of sleep quality) will be measured.
Weeks 1-12
Association between brain age index (BAI) and sleep quality (as measured via respiration).
Time Frame: Weeks 1-12
Breathing patterns will be measured via a wearable respiratory sensor device (AirGo) as they vary with sleep stage and depth (markers of sleep quality). The Airgo device measures the expansion and recoil of the patient's chest.
Weeks 1-12
Association between brain age index (BAI) and pre-existing co-morbidity (as measured via the Charlson Co-morbidity Index).
Time Frame: Baseline
The Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI) assesses 17 categories that together evaluates a patient's ten-year survival. Each co-morbidity category has an associated weight (from 1 to 6), based on the adjusted risk of mortality or resource use, and the sum of all the weights result in a single co-morbidity score for a patient. A score of zero indicates that no co-morbidities were found. The higher the score, the more likely the predicted outcome will result in mortality or higher resource use.
Baseline
Association between brain age index (BAI) and depression (as measured via the Patient Health Questionnaire-2).
Time Frame: Baseline
The Patient Health Questionnaire scale (PHQ-2) is a 2-item screening measure which ranges from a score of 0 to 6. The higher the score, the more likely there is an underlying depressive disorder.
Baseline
Association between brain age index (BAI) and anxiety (as measured via the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-2).
Time Frame: Baseline
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) is a 2-item screening measure which ranges from a score of 0 to 6. The higher the score, the more likely there is an underlying anxiety disorder.
Baseline
Association between brain age index (BAI) and diet (as measured via the 14-Q Mediterranean Diet Questionnaire).
Time Frame: Baseline
The 14-item Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS) is a brief questionnaire assessing adherence to the Mediterranean diet. It consists of a total of 14 questions that characterize key food groups commonly consumed as part of a traditional Mediterranean diet (12 questions about frequency of food consumption; two questions about food intake habits). Answers are summed to a total Mediterranean diet score ranging from 0 to 14, with higher scores indicating greater adherence.
Baseline
Association between brain age index (BAI) and social network (as measured via the Social Network Index).
Time Frame: Baseline
The Cohen's Social Network Index (SNI) assesses the size, diversity, and complexity of a respondent's current social network across 12 types of social relationships. Social network size measures the total number of people with whom the patient has regular contact (at least once every 2 weeks) and is computed by summing across the 12 roles. Social network diversity measures the number of social roles in which the patient has regular with at least 1 person (range 0-12). Social network complexity measures the number of different network domains in which a patient is active (range 0-8). Higher scores represent a larger, more diverse and complex social network.
Baseline
Association between brain age index (BAI) and social network (as measured via the University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale).
Time Frame: Baseline
The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale is a 20-item scale designed to measure one's subjective feelings of loneliness as well as feelings of social isolation (range 20-80). Higher scores indicate greater degrees of loneliness.
Baseline
Association between brain age index (BAI) and socioeconomic status (as measured via The Hollingshead Four Factor Index of Social Status).
Time Frame: Baseline
The Hollingshead Four Factor Index of Social Status (Hollingshead, 1975) use education, occupation, sex, and marital status to determine a family's composite social status. Education scores (range 1-7), occupation codes (range 1-9) are weighted by 3 and 5 respectively. Raw scores range from 8 to 66, with higher scores reflecting higher socioeconomic status.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: M. Brandon Westover, MD/PhD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 31, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 4, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

August 4, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019P000673

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sleep Disorder

Clinical Trials on Moderate-Intensity Exercise

Subscribe