Propolis Extract, Nanovitamin C and Nanovitamin E in Peri-implant Mucositis

December 31, 2019 updated by: Rosa María López-Pintor Muñoz, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Effect of Propolis Extract, Nanovitamin C and Nanovitamin E in Clinical and Microbiological Parameters of Peri-implant Mucositis: A Double-blind, Randomized, Clinical Trial

The objective of this study was to perform the first clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of propolis extract, nanovitamin C and nanovitamin E gel as adjuvant to mechanical debridement in clinical and microbiological parameters of implants with peri-implant mucositis

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28005
        • Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • cooperative adult patients,
  • with one or more implants with peri-implant mucositis, and
  • presenting at least 18 months of functional loading.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refuse to participate in the study,
  • patients who had implants with peri-implantitis (BOP and/or suppuration together with progressive radiographic marginal bone loss),
  • patients with uncontrolled periodontitis (presence of nine or more sites with PD ≥ 5 mm and with full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) > 25%),
  • systemic diseases or conditions that could alter the results of the study (diabetes mellitus, immunosuppression, infectious diseases, rheumatoid disease, history of bisphosphonate treatment, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, etc.),
  • patients who had taken local and/or systemic antibiotics less than 2 months ago,
  • pregnant or breastfeeding women, and
  • patients with history of allergies to the test and/or placebo components administered.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Test group
Gel contained in tubes with the same appearance (30g), identical in colour, flavour and density, with the following components: Sodium-Monofluorophosphate, Silicon Dioxide, Glycerin, D-sorbitol, Polyethylene glycol, Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose, Xylitol, Sterol Glycoside, Peppermint Oil, L-Menthol, Methyl Hydroxybenzoate, Deionized Water, Propolis Extract (2%), Ascorbic Acid (0.2%) and Tocopherol Acetate (0.2%).
The patient had to use the gel as a toothpaste and apply it with an interdental brush in mesial and distal aspects of the implant with peri-implant mucositis. during 1 month.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo group
Gel contained in tubes with the same appearance (30g), identical in colour, flavour and density, with the following components: Sodium-Monofluorophosphate, Silicon Dioxide, Glycerin, D-sorbitol, Polyethylene glycol, Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose, Xylitol, Sterol Glycoside, Peppermint Oil, L-Menthol, Methyl Hydroxybenzoate, Deionized Water and E155/151 coloring.
The patient had to use the gel as a toothpaste and apply it with an interdental brush in mesial and distal aspects of the implant with peri-implant mucositis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in bleeding on probing
Time Frame: baseline and 1-month follow-up
It was present when it appeared bleeding at the gingival margin after recording probing depths at six sites in each implant. Modified bleeding index was also collected.
baseline and 1-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in probing depth
Time Frame: baseline and 1-month follow-up
It was recorded at six sites of each implant with PM, using a probe with a force of 0.2N (PCV12; HuFriedy, Chicago, IL, EEUU).
baseline and 1-month follow-up
Changes in plaque index
Time Frame: baseline and 1-month follow-up
It was recorded after using a disclosing dye, as the presence of dental plaque at the gingival margin at six sites in each implant.
baseline and 1-month follow-up
Changes in microbilogical sample
Time Frame: baseline and 1-month follow-up

Microbiological samples were obtained at the deepest peri-implant pocket. Firstly, the area was isolated using cotton rolls and dried with a gentle air blow. Then, three sterile paper tips (#30, Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) were left for 10 seconds at the point with the greatest peri-implant pocket depth. Finally, the papers were introduced in a vial containing 1.5 ml of reduced transport fluid.

The vials were sent to the microbiology laboratory of the School of Dentistry, at Complutense University of Madrid for an anaerobic culture within 24 hours. Total counts and counts of target periodontal pathongens [Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Tannerella forsythia, Parvimonas micra, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Campylobacter rectus, Eikenella corrodens, Capnocytophaga sp., Actinomyces odontolyticus] were determined after 7-14 days of anaerobic incubation. Then, those results were converted in colony-forming units per ml.

baseline and 1-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 25, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 21, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peri-implant Mucositis

Clinical Trials on Gel containing propolis extract, nanovitamin C and nanovitamin E

Subscribe