Improvement of Psoriasis Patients' Adherence to Topical Drugs

January 24, 2024 updated by: Mathias Tiedemann Svendsen, Odense University Hospital

Long-term Improvement of Psoriasis Patients' Adherence to Topical Drugs: Testing a Patient-supporting Intervention Delivered by Healthcare Professionals

Psoriasis affects 2-4% of the Western adult population and is a socio-economic burden for patients and society. Topical drugs are recommended as first-line treatment for mild-to-moderate psoriasis, but low adherence is a barrier for treatment success. There is a need for improved patient support for psoriasis patients, which is suggested to improve long-term use of topical drugs.

The project aims to test whether a patient-supporting intervention delivered by healthcare professionals can improve the use of topical drugs. The intervention design is based on experiences with previous adherence-improving studies consisting of digital support by conducting a systematic literature search and holding focus groups with patients as well as healthcare professionals. The intervention consists of shared decision-making with patients, nurses and doctors, frequent consultations, easy access to healthcare professionals through video or in-office consultations and holding patients accountable for taking the medication.

The intervention will be tested in a randomized controlled trial: during a 48 week period, a group of patients (18-85 years of age) diagnosed with mild-to-moderate psoriasis and treated with topical drugs will be randomized to an intervention (n=40) or non-intervention group (n=40). The primary outcome will be severity of psoriasis and secondary outcomes primary adherence (i.e., rate of filled prescriptions) and quality of life.

If the intervention can reduce the severity of psoriasis in a significant manner, there is a potential for a national implementation of the intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Background Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease affecting 2-4% of the Western adult population. It is associated with many comorbidities, negatively affects quality of life and is a socioeconomic burden for patients and society. Topical drugs are the recommended first-line treatment for mild-to-moderate psoriasis, but adherence rates are low, which is a barrier for treatment success, resulting in a need for systemic or biological treatments, which are associated with more severe adverse events and are more expensive than topical drugs. However, improved adherence to topical drugs is associated with improved efficacy. That is why there is a need for improving psoriasis patients' adherence to topical drugs.

As a supplement to the introduction of new and advanced technology, there is a need for more studies on how to optimize the available healthcare professionals in dermatology clinics. Since dermatologists are a limited resource, there is a need to study how other healthcare professionals, e.g., hospital nurses and pharmaconomists at the pharmacies, can support psoriasis patients in their use of topical drugs.

Hypothesis

A patient-supporting intervention delivered by dermatologists, dermatology nurses and pharmaconomists significantly reduces psoriasis patients' severity of psoriasis compared to standard patient support.

Aims

The aim of the project is to test whether an individualized patient-supporting intervention delivered to psoriasis patients by dermatologists, nurses and pharmaconomists at a dermatology hospital clinic can: 1) reduce the severity of psoriasis, 2) improve quality of life, and 3) improve adherence to prescribed topical drugs.

Ethical considerations

All participants will be fully informed of the purpose of the study, and the study will be performed in accordance with the ethical principles in the Belmont report.

Materials and methods

The study is an investigator-initiated, single-centre, assessor-blinded, parallel group superiority randomized clinical study. Before inclusion of study participants, the study will be approved by the local regional ethics committee.

We will include patients (18-85 years of age) with milder-to-moderate psoriasis.

Outcomes

Outcome measurements will be either patient-reported or assessor-blinded.

Adherence measurements

Primary adherence: Proportion of filled topical prescriptions.

Secondary adherence:

Amount of medication used according to weight of the remains in the used medication packages. Data will be assessed week 48.

Disease severity measurements

Disease severity will be measured by Lattice-System Physician's Global Assessment (LS-PGA) (15), and the quality of life will be measured by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). This data will be assessed at baseline, weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48.

Recruitment

Psoriasis patients who use topical treatments and are referred to the Department of Dermatology at Odense University Hospital will be recruited to the project until there is a sufficient number of participants included (n=100).

Hypothesis and expected number of participants

Our null hypothesis is that there is no difference in reduction of psoriasis between the intervention and non-intervention groups.

The sample size was calculated based on data from a previous project with consumption data for the use of prescribed calcipotriol betamethasone dipropionate cutaneous foam over 4 weeks. We expect an 20% difference in the LS-PGA, power 80%, two-sided significance of 95%, allocation of 1: 1 and an expected dropout rate of 25%. When using an unpaired t-test, the calculation resulted in the inclusion of a sample size consisting of 80 participants.

Blinding and randomization

Blinding of the data assessors: When the data assessor obtains baseline data from the study participants, it will be entered by an electronic data collection tool.

Participants will be allocated 1: 1 to an intervention or non-intervention arm via a computer-generated block randomization. The data assessor will be blinded to the allocation.

Statistics

Analysis of the primary outcome: changes in LS-PGA

Changes in LS-PGA measurements from baseline to weeks 12 and from baseline to weeks 24, 36 and 48 will be compared between the two groups by linear mixed model for longitudinal data. LS-PGA will be presented in box plots. As a sensitivity analysis on LS-PGA, the analysis will be carried out excluding missing data and after 100 times multiple imputations by multivariate normal regression on LS-PGA data, without included covariates in addition to with an imputation including treatment, age, sex and smoking as covariates.

Analysis of secondary outcomes: Changes in DLQI and adherence

Changes in DLQI measurements from baseline to weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48 will be compared between the two groups by linear mixed model for longitudinal data. DLQI will be presented in box plots.

For the analysis of adherence (by filled prescriptions, weight and patient reported), we will dichotomize adherence rate with a selected cut-off of 80%, with adherence rates above 80% considered adherent (a cut-off typically used when studying adherence in chronic diseases) [7, 42]. We will compare the dichotomized adherences by using logistic regression.

The statistical analysis will be conducted by an experienced statistician blinded to the intervention. An interim analysis is not planned.

Discussion

This study will demonstrate whether an individualized, optimized patient support delivered by doctors, nurses and pharmaconomists to dermatological patients can optimize the use of topical treatment, reduce the severity of psoriasis and have socioeconomic benefits compared to standard treatment. If the study shows that individualized and optimized patient support is effective, it is intended for the intervention to be implemented in the clinic. In addition, we will work on implementing the intervention nationally by a translational process.

Results from the study may also be referred to other chronic dermatological disorders. The study may be used methodically as a model for additional research projects investigating medical adherence in other chronic skin diseases.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

103

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Odense C, Denmark, 5000
        • Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Legally competent patients with milder-to-moderate psoriasis

Exclusion Criteria: Incapable patients not diagnosed with psoriasis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group

Intervention group:

All participants will be instructed how to use of the medication according to "the fingertip unit for topical steroids". All participants will be prescribed topical drugs based on shared decision between the prescriber and patient. The topical drugs will be either moderate corticosteroids (clobetasone-17-butyrate or hydrocortisone-17-butyrate), potent corticosteroids (betamethasone-17-valerate and betamethasone, mometasone furoate, fluocinolone acetonide or fluocinonide), very potent corticosteroids (clobetasol propionate), corticosteroids with antimicrobials (betamethasone and clioquinol, betamethasone and fusidic acid or fluocinolone acetonide and clioquinol), corticosteroid with calcipotriol or calcipotriol cream.

During the study period, a nurse or pharmaconomist will deliver;

  • Improved support and instructions to the patients
  • Patients will receive a diary and access to more consultations.
Improved support to patients prescribed topical antipsoriatic drugs
No Intervention: Non-intervention group
All participants will be instructed how to use of the medication according to "the fingertip unit for topical steroids". All participants will be prescribed topical drugs based on shared decision between the prescriber and patient. The topical drugs will be either moderate corticosteroids (clobetasone-17-butyrate or hydrocortisone-17-butyrate), potent corticosteroids (betamethasone-17-valerate and betamethasone, mometasone furoate, fluocinolone acetonide or fluocinonide), very potent corticosteroids (clobetasol propionate), corticosteroids with antimicrobials (betamethasone and clioquinol, betamethasone and fusidic acid or fluocinolone acetonide and clioquinol), corticosteroid with calcipotriol or calcipotriol cream.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity of Psoriasis
Time Frame: Change from baseline at week 48
Lattice-System Physician's Global Assessment (LS-PGA) (interval scale). From value 1 (no visible psoriasis) to 8 (severely affected by psoriasis).
Change from baseline at week 48

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary Adherence
Time Frame: Week 48

Proportion of expected consumed amount of topical drugs.

Secondary adherence was calculated by combining measured amount of medication used (determined by the weight of the remains in the used medication packages) per body surface area unit affected.

Estimated recommended consumption of medication was 0.5 g per day multiplied by the estimated mean body surface area (BSA) during the whole study period, calculated from BSA measures at baseline and at weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48.

Week 48
Quality of Life (QOL)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to week 48
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) (interval scale). From value 0 (no impact on quality of life) to 30 (severe impact on quality of life).
Change from baseline to week 48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mathias T Svendsen, MD, PhD, Odense University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 19, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 16, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LF-OC-000048

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psoriasis Vulgaris

Clinical Trials on Improved support by health-care professionals

3
Subscribe