R34 Family Navigator Enhancing Early Engagement (NavE3)

January 11, 2021 updated by: University of Oklahoma

R34 Family Navigator E3 Project: Enhance Early Engagement in Mental Health Services Through Children's Advocacy Center's Family Advocates

For the current study, the investigators will develop, implement, and evaluate web-based and consultative training for Family Advocates employed at Children's Advocacy Centers (CACs) across the United States to enhance children's early engagement in evidence-based mental health treatment. The interactive web-based training will embed key targets of knowledge and skills related to family engagement, trauma, evidence-based practices (EBP), and EBP services in the community. Seventy-five CACs who apply to participate in training will be randomized to a webinar-only training group, a webinar plus consultation training group, and a delayed (waitlist) control group. It is hypothesized that the Family Advocates and CAC Directors will report high levels of satisfaction with the training. More importantly, it is also hypothesized that webinar training will improve Family Advocates' knowledge, resulting in minor improvement in EBP engagement, while the addition of consultation in the second training group will lead to increased use of engagement skills, thereby resulting in greater improvement in family engagement in EBP.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Partnering with the accrediting board for CACs, the National Children's Alliance (NCA), the investigators will implement and evaluate training for Family Advocates to enhance early engagement in EBP (E3 training). Two levels of E3 training will be tested. The first level, webinar-only (E3w), will be web-based training on MH screening, EBP identification, trauma and effects of trauma, and engagement strategies that directly target known hindrances to accessing EBP in high risk, traumatized populations. The second level, webinar plus consultation (E3w+c), will add short-term consultation with experts in engagement and mental health. Consultation will target Family Advocates' skills in engagement, mental health screening, and coordination of care through strategies found to enhance skill acquisition. The investigators propose to test two key mechanisms of change for improving EBP engagement: knowledge (e.g., EBP identification) and skills (e.g., addressing caregiver perceptions of MH). To examine these change mechanisms, the investigators will implement the feasibility study designed to accomplish three tasks: (1) test if E3w training provides incremental benefits in engagement rates over the no training comparison group, (2) examine if E3w+c further improves outcomes beyond the E3w engagement rates and (3) examine mediating and moderating factors impacting outcome and implementation, including cost. The hypotheses that E3w will improve Family Advocates' knowledge, resulting in minor improvement in EBP engagement, and that addition of consultation in E3w+c will lead to increased use of engagement skills, resulting in greater improvement in family engagement in EBP, will be tested.

Using NCA's innovative data capture systems, including the Outcome Management System (OMS; designed to obtain follow-up surveys from families and multidisciplinary team members), as well as a specific data tracking procedure using REDCap, the investigators will track case management details (including mental health needs and referrals) from each site randomized. In addition, knowledge learned via the training (pre- and post-knowledge assessments) will be tracked. In addition, NCA quantitative data on family engagement in EBP will be drawn, and the data submitted and integrated with pre- and post-training surveys of Family Advocates and CAC leaders measuring knowledge and perceptions of the training, including its utility, strengths, weaknesses, and costs.

Applications were released to CACs nationwide in October of 2019, and sites were officially selected and randomized to groups using an adaptive randomization procedure such that a broad range of the selected covariates that are hypothesized to influence key outcomes occurs in all conditions. Participants from sites, including Advocates and Senior Leaders, will officially consent and enroll in the study in mid-December 2019. Participants will provide study data via an online data platform (i.e., REDCap). The outcomes of interest are the time-varying and CAC-varying provider fidelity and knowledge, as well as the family screening and engagement in treatment. Linear mixed effects models will be used to evaluate these outcomes, with generalized versions of these applied whenever the distribution of the outcome variable and the residuals suggest these to be appropriate

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

297

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20002
        • National Children's Alliance
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73117
        • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fully accredited by NCA
  • Directly provides EBP for child mental health or has established and demonstrated linkages for services in the community
  • Participates in OMS
  • Has Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) or data sharing agreements with all referral sources
  • Both CAC directors and Family Advocate(s) must demonstrate commitment to the training and data collection procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • There are no specific exclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SCREENING
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Webinar only
Participants in this arm will attend a webinar training program (3 webinars over the course of 4 to 8 weeks) to receive training in evidence-based engagement strategies, trauma, evidence-based practices, and mental health screening.
Webinar-based training to provide information regarding evidence-based engagement strategies (e.g., motivational interviewing, McKay's engagement model), trauma, mental health screening, and identifying evidence-based mental health treatments for children.
EXPERIMENTAL: Webinar plus consultation
Participants in this arm will receive the same webinar training as subjects in arm 1, but they will also receive 10 consultation calls over the course of four months to further develop their skills in engaging families and screening for mental health services.
Webinar-based training to provide information regarding evidence-based engagement strategies (e.g., motivational interviewing, McKay's engagement model), trauma, mental health screening, and identifying evidence-based mental health treatments for children.
10 consultation calls with experts in engagement, child trauma, and mental health screening to support the webinar training
NO_INTERVENTION: Delayed training group
This group will not receive any training for the duration of the study year, in order to serve as a waitlist control group. They will be eligible to receive the training after the randomized control trial has been completed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of child engagement in mental health services
Time Frame: Tracked over the course of one year for all families seen at the CAC.
Caregiver report (via Outcome Management System [OMS] survey on a yes/no item) if family attended the first appointment of mental health services they were referred to be the CAC.
Tracked over the course of one year for all families seen at the CAC.
Score on 45-item Knowledge Assessment
Time Frame: Through study completion, up to one year
Questionnaire of knowledge-based multiple choice and true/false questions, assessing knowledge of evidence-based engagement skills, trauma, evidence-based treatments, and mental health screening, yielding a total correct out of 45
Through study completion, up to one year
Rate of evidence-based Engagement Skills survey
Time Frame: Through study completion, up to one year
Advocate self-report of use of evidence-based engagement skills via a 39-item survey with skills utilized ranked on 5-point Likert scale (not at all to extensively); Caregiver report of advocate use of skills via three items on the OMS Survey, rating Advocate use of skills on a 4-point Likert scale (strongly agree to Strongly Disagree)
Through study completion, up to one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jane F Silovsky, Ph.D., University of Oklahoma

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 11, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 4, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 9, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 13, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 11290 (Registry Identifier: DAIDS ES Registry Number)
  • R34MH118486 (NIH)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Currently working with NIMH to determining data archiving process.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Health Issue

Clinical Trials on Enhancing Early Engagement (E3) webinar

3
Subscribe