MicroUDxTM: a Rapid Diagnostic Tool That Will Prevent Death and Disability From Common Infections (MicroUDxTM)

May 31, 2022 updated by: Ian Lewis, University of Calgary

The Development of a Rapid and Accurate Method for Detecting and Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria Causing Urinary Tract Infection Using a Metabolomic Platform

Background & Rational:

Antibiotics are a major underpinning of modern medicine. The global rise of antimicrobial resistant (AMR) organisms is a serious world health problem. With few new antimicrobial drugs on the horizon, it is imperative that we develop novel approaches to extend the service life of our existing drugs. AMR is a complex problem that is being driven by a wide range of factors. More than half of the antibiotics prescribed have no medical benefit, and outpatient visits for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a major contributor to this problem. Recent studies have shown that nearly half of people treated for UTIs receive the wrong frontline drug and in 75% of patients, the duration of therapy is inappropriate. Limitations in the current diagnostic technology make it impossible to identify UTI pathogens and measure their antibiotic sensitivities during the short out-patient clinical visits that are typical for most UTI patients. These circumstances result in the inappropriate use of stronger than necessary or inappropriate antimicrobials. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate a system that can detect bacteria in urine and find the best antibiotic in under 4 hours, thus enabling a rapid diagnosis and use of the most appropriate and cost-effective antimicrobial agent for the agent detected.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Testing done in this study will be performed either on bacterial isolates stored in the microbiology laboratory at the Diagnostic and Scientific Center in Calgary, or on up to one milliliter of residual urine sample submitted to the diagnostic laboratory with a request for urine culture and sensitivity. All urine cultures will be performed and reported in accordance with standards laboratory protocols. Research testing will only be done on residual sample once patient samples are processed or reported on for clinical purposes.

During the first phase of the study, metabolic biomarkers for uropathogens will be identified using mass spectrometry on sub-cultures of frozen isolates from the diagnostic microbiology laboratory. This will include at least 50 isolates each of uropathogens consisting of but not limited to Escherichia coli, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter species, Proteus mirabilis, Citrobacter species, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus species, and Candida species. Biomarkers that are present in greater than 95% of the isolates will subsequently be using the analysis of 2000 negative, and 2000 positive urine cultures. Compounds that are subsequently identified as high yield will be selected for carbon 13 labeling to service standards.

In phase II of the study, following the development of a biomarker enrichment device at the CMRF, a performance urinalysis of the device will be conducted using residual urine sample from 1000 negative and 2000 positive urine specimens as outlined above. The performance of the new device will be evaluated relative to standard cultures and urine liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Following the creation of a sensitive and specific assay, a prospective study will be carried out at the diagnostic microbiology laboratory. 3000 sample submitted for urine culture will be process in parallel with the new device and standard microbiology procedures. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive value for each analyte compared to standard culture will be determined in this portion of the study. Cost calculations and performance characteristics including turnaround time of the new assay will be compared to that in the standard laboratory procedure.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

10000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The majority of urine samples collected in Calgary coming from young healthy females with symptoms of cystitis or pyelonephritis. However, residual sample from any patient where a urine culture has been ordered could be included in the study if it falls within the time during which residual samples are being processed.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have not submitted urine samples will not be included as the samples are required for both standard testing and research. This would include patients who are being treated empirically by physicians.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's who have not submitted urine samples for culture will not be included in study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
UTI Positive

In phase I of the study testing residual urine samples the aim is to include at least 50 positive samples from each bacterial species known to be commonly associated with urinary tract infections. We selected 2000 positive urines to enable capturing enough of these organisms in the development process.

For phase II of the study, the same number of positive samples in order to include all common species causing urinary tract infection. The number of negative samples included is reduced to 1000.

Phase 3 - approximately one third of all urine sample submitted will be positive for a uropathogen. Sample size of 3000 we expect 1000 these to be culture positive. We expect most uropathogens occurring at a frequency of 5% or more will be included with sufficient numbers in the validation process.

UTI Negative Control
2000 negative urine samples are being run as controlled to ensure the false positivity rate is low.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assay ID Validation
Time Frame: 2 years
In the validation phase of the study sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for detecting significant bacteriuria using culture as the gold standard, These values will be calculated for the whole cohort as per standard definitions using statistical software (Analyse-it for Excel).
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Susceptibility - anti-microbial susceptibility of new assay versus standard laboratory methods
Time Frame: 2 years
A secondary outcome variable will be the detection of antimicrobial susceptibility using the new assay will be the calculation of essential and categorical agreement, major, very major and minor errors between the new assay and standard laboratory methods as per standard laboratory definitions.
2 years
Turn-around-time to bacterial detection and susceptibility
Time Frame: 2 years
Another secondary outcome will be the turn-around- time (TAT) to bacterial detection and availability of susceptibility results.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ian A Lewis, PhD, University of Calgary

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

August 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 14, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No data will be made available to other researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bacterial Urinary Tract Infection

Subscribe