Temocillin Versus Carbapenems for Urinary Tract Infection Due to ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (TEMO-BLSE)

December 11, 2020 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois

Temocillin Versus Carbapenems for Urinary Tract Infection Due to ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae: a Multicenter Case-control Study.

To assess the efficacy of temocillin compared to carbapenems for the management of ESBL-E UTI.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Adults with a definite diagnosis of ESBL-E UTI between January-2015 and October-2019 were enrolled in a multicenter retrospective case-control study. Cases were treated with temocillin ≥50% of the effective antibiotic therapy duration. Control exclusively received carbapenem over the effective antibiotic therapy duration.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

144

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Consecutive adults hospitalized in participating sites for a definite diagnosis of UTI due to an ESBL-producing enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) susceptible to carbapenems, were eligible for the study if they provided a non-opposition form for retrospective data collection.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults
  • Diagnosis of UTI defined by at least two of the following symptoms :chills,temperature >38°C (fever), flank or pelvic pain, nausea or vomiting, dysuria, urinary frequency, or urinary urgency, costovertebral angle tenderness on physical examination
  • Positive urine culture with ≥ 103 CFU/mL of a single strain of ESBL-E
  • Confirmed ESBL-producing enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) susceptible to carbapenems

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Multibacterial infection
  • Opposition to data collection according to GDPR

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Control
Carbapenem (imipenem, or meropenem, or ertapenem) as first-line therapy or after receiving up to 72 hours of other antibiotics (including aminoglycosides).
No intervention
Cases
Temocillin above 50% of the time of effective antibiotic therapy duration. Temocillin had to be given as first-line therapy or after receiving a maximum of 5 days of other antibiotics (including carbapenems and aminoglycosides).
No intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of clinical cure
Time Frame: Day 14 (End of antibiotic treatment according to national recommendations)
Number of patient in clinical cure is defined as the resolution of fever and symptoms of UTI present at antibiotic initiation (and no new symptoms) and the absence of clinical or microbiological failure.
Day 14 (End of antibiotic treatment according to national recommendations)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Kinetic of fever defervescence
Time Frame: Baseline (day 0), day 3, day 7, day 14
Median fever calculation
Baseline (day 0), day 3, day 7, day 14
Inflammatory biomarkers
Time Frame: Baseline (day 0), day 3, day 7, day 14
White blood cells (WBC) count (/mm3)
Baseline (day 0), day 3, day 7, day 14
Inflammatory biomarkers
Time Frame: Baseline (day 0), day 3, day 7, day 14
CRP level (mg/l)
Baseline (day 0), day 3, day 7, day 14
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 3 months after UTI diagnosis
Mean duration of hospital stay
3 months after UTI diagnosis
Relapse of UTI
Time Frame: 3 months after antibiotic therapy initiation
Number of patient with a new UTI diagnosis after the end of antibiotic treatment
3 months after antibiotic therapy initiation
Loss to follow-up, re-hospitalization, and mortality (safety endpoints)
Time Frame: 3 months after antibiotic therapy initiation
Number of loss to follow-up, re-hospitalization, and mortality
3 months after antibiotic therapy initiation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mathieu LAFAURIE, M.D, APHP, St Louis Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 31, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Tract Infection Bacterial

Clinical Trials on Any intervention

3
Subscribe