Platelet Rich Plasma Injection Versus Surgical and Medical Treatment of Mild-moderate Carpel Tunnel Syndrome.

January 18, 2020 updated by: Dalia Salah Saif
to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of single ultrasound guided Platelet Rich Plasma injection of the carpal tunnel Vs. surgical procedures and medical treatment and hand support in patients with mild-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome regarding pain relief and function improvement during a follow up period of 6 months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) accounts for approximately 90% of peripheral entrapment neuropathy cases. Existing evidence based treatments for carpal tunnel syndrome, splinting, corticosteroid injection and surgery, are not 100% effective and alternative treatments are worth exploring .Surgery indicated in Patients with persistent numbness and pain, motor dysfunction with diminished grip or pinch grasping, or thenar eminence flattening. Empirical evidence indicates that many patients with CTS have self-limiting symptoms and respond to splinting and anti-inflammatory medications. Recently major attention has been drawn to platelet-rich plasma for its possible effects on axon regeneration and neurological recovery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11311
        • Dalia Saif

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with signs and symptoms of CTS and a confirmed diagnosis of mild and moderate CTS based on clinical and electrophysiological studies were included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. pregnancy.
  2. history of underlying metabolic diseases (such as diabetes mellitus, thyroid diseases, rheumatoid arthritis and etc.).
  3. history of local corticosteroid injection in the past 3 months.
  4. atrophy of thenar muscles.
  5. previous carpal tunnel release surgery and evidence of concomitant neuropathy or radiculopathy.
  6. Patients with autoimmune or hematologic disorders, NSAID consumption 2 days prior to injection, treatment with antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents, Hb level under 12 g/dl, and platelet count under 150,000 in ml.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: surgical group.
30 patients went to the surgical release of carpal tunnel.
30 patients went to surgical RELEASE OF TRANSVERSE VOLAR LIGAMENT.
Experimental: medical group.
30 patients received conventional medical treatment (NSAIDs, diclofenac 150 mg/day for 2 weeks and 1500 g vitamin B 12 per day for 6 weeks) and hand support.
30 patients received conventional medical treatment (NSAIDs, diclofenac 150 mg/day for 2 weeks and 1500 g vitamin B 12 per day for 6 weeks) and hand support.
Experimental: injection group.
Thirty patients were injected in the carpal tunnel with a of single ultrasound-guided Platelet Rich Plasma (1-2 ml) injections treatments
Thirty patients were injected in the carpal tunnel with a of single ultrasound-guided Platelet Rich Plasma (1-2 ml) injections treatments
Other Names:
  • PRP injection.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS (Visual Analogue Scale),
Time Frame: at baseline and at 3 and 6 months post injection.
The pain severity was determined by the patients, on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (agonizing pain)
at baseline and at 3 and 6 months post injection.
Electrophysiological study of median nerve.
Time Frame: at baseline and at 3 and 6 months post injection.
motor and sensory conductive of the median nerve.
at baseline and at 3 and 6 months post injection.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 26, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel

Clinical Trials on 30 patients went to surgical procedure

3
Subscribe