GRAvity- Versus Wall Suction-drIven Large Volume Thoracentesis: a rAndomized Controlled Study (GRAWITAS Study)

February 9, 2024 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

The primary objective of this study is to compare gravity-driven versus wall suction-driven large volume therapeutic thoracentesis on the development of chest discomfort during the procedure.

This study is a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial designed to compare chest discomfort between gravity-driven and wall suction-driven therapeutic thoracentesis. Patients will be stratified by study centers, and randomly assigned to intervention and control arms; and will remain blinding to their group assignment during the procedure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Aims and Objectives:

The primary objective of this study is to compare gravity-driven versus wall suction-driven large volume therapeutic thoracentesis on the development of chest discomfort during the procedure.

Expected Outcomes:

We anticipate that gravity driven therapeutic thoracentesis will result in improved clinical outcomes compared to wall suction driven thoracentesis, defined by less chest discomfort throughout the procedure as measured at 5 minutes post-procedure (primary endpoint).

Primary endpoint:

The Global Pain Score will be determined at 5 minutes post-procedure using a VAS 0-100 and represents the pain experienced by the patient during the entire procedure from the beginning to the 5-minute post-procedure assessment ("On average, how much discomfort have you felt during the procedure?"). The primary endpoint is defined as the overall procedural chest pain scored 5 minutes following the procedure.

This study is a randomized controlled trial designed to compare the changes of chest pain scores between gravity-driven therapeutic thoracentesis and wall suction-driven thoracentesis. The estimated minimal clinically important difference of the change is 10.

Secondary endpoints:

  1. Duration of procedure timed from the beginning of fluid drainage to catheter removal.
  2. Differences in narcotics used after the procedure.
  3. Incidence of pneumothorax detected on the post procedural CXR
  4. Incidence of clinically apparent re-expansion pulmonary edema
  5. Incidence of radiographically apparent re-expansion pulmonary edema detected on the post procedural CXR

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

228

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77051
        • Recruiting
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Referral to pulmonary services for large-volume thoracentesis
  2. Presence of a symptomatic moderate or large free-flowing (non-septated) pleural effusion on the basis of:

    1. Chest radiograph: effusion filling ≥ 1/3 the hemithorax, OR
    2. CT-scan: maximum AP depth of the effusion ≥ 1/3 of the AP dimension on the axial image superior to the hemidiaphragm, including atelectatic lung completely surrounded by effusion, OR Ultrasound: effusion spanning at least three interspaces, with depth of 3 cm or greater in at least one intercostal space, while the patient sits upright.
  3. Age >/= 18

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Inability to provide informed consent
  2. Study subject has any disease or condition that interferes with safe completion of the study including:

    1. Coagulopathy, with criteria left at the discretion of the operator
    2. Hemodynamic instability with systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or heart rate > 120 beats/min, unless deemed to be stable with these values by the attending physicians
  3. Pleural effusion is smaller than expected on bedside pre-procedure ultrasound
  4. Referral is for diagnostic thoracentesis only
  5. Presence of more than minimal septations and/or loculations( more than 3) on bedside pre-procedure ultrasound
  6. Inability to sit for the procedure
  7. Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1: Standard Suction Thoracentesis
treatment techniques suction is a standard of care and used for draining fluid around the lung.
a procedure that removes excess fluid from the space in between your lungs and chest wall
a procedure that removes excess fluid from the space in between your lungs and chest wall
Experimental: Group 2: Gravity Thoracentesis.
treatment techniques (gravity ) is a standard of care and used for draining fluid around the lung.
a procedure that removes excess fluid from the space in between your lungs and chest wall
a procedure that removes excess fluid from the space in between your lungs and chest wall

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The overall procedural chest pain questionnaire
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The Global Pain Score will be determined at 5 minutes post-procedure using a VAS 0-100 and represents the pain experienced by the patient during the entire procedure from the beginning to the 5-minute post-procedure assessment
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Horianna Grosu, MD, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 10, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 23, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018-0654
  • NCI-2021-13202 (Other Identifier: Clinical Trials Reporting Program (CTRP))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Edema

Clinical Trials on Standard Suction Thoracentesis

3
Subscribe