Erector Spinae Plane Block Reduces Postoperative Pain Following Laparoscopic Colorectal Operation

September 11, 2023 updated by: Jung Ju Choi, Gachon University Gil Medical Center

Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Reduces Postoperative Pain Following Laparoscopic Colorectal Operation: A Randomized Controlled Study

The goal of this study is to evaluate the effect of ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain and quality of recovery after laparoscopic colon surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

.The goal of this study is to evaluate the effect of ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain and quality of recovery after laparoscopic colon surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Incheon, Korea, Republic of, 21565
        • Recruiting
        • Gachon University College of Medicine, Gil Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • hyung jeong kwak, MD,PHD
          • Phone Number: 82324603637

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged between 20 and 70 years, with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of 1 or 2, who were scheduled for laparoscopic colorectal operation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • sensitivity to local anesthetic, bleeding disorders , receiving anticoagulant, body mass index (BMI) over 35/kg/m2 spine or chest wall deformity pregnancy tolerance to opioid analgesics inability to use patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: ESP( Erector Spinae Plane Block)

After induction parturient in the ESPB underwent bilateral ESPB at the level of T7 using a linear ultrasound (US) transducer.

Intravenous fentanyl patient control device 24-hour fentanyl consumption will be recorded.

24-hour fentanyl consumption will be recorded.
The transducer was placed vertically 3cm lateral to the midline to visualize the muscles of the back, transverse process and the pleura in between the two transverse processes. After local infiltration of the needle insertion site with 2-3 ml of 2% lidocaine needle was inserted in cranial-caudal direction towards the transvers process using in plane technique until the needle cross all the muscles then interfascial injection of 20ml local anesthetics is done after ensuring negative aspiration, the procedure was repeated following the same steps on the other side of the back.
Active Comparator: control group

No regional anesthesia technique will be applied to the control group.

Intravenous fentanyl patient control device 24-hour fentanyl consumption will be recorded.

24-hour fentanyl consumption will be recorded.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
numerical rating scale on rest and cough
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
In the recovery room, post op 6hours, post op 24 hours
24 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
opioid consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
In the recovery room, post op 6hours, post op 24 hours
24 hours after surgery
Quality of Recovery
Time Frame: 1day before operation, post op 24 hours
pre operative QoR 40 scores compares
1day before operation, post op 24 hours
need for analgesics
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
Number of patients who required analgesic in the first 24 hour
24 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: hyunjeong kwack, md,phd, Gachon University Gil Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 20, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Intravenous fentanyl patient control device

3
Subscribe