- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04255342
Azento IIS 3 Year Outcomes Implant Study
Clinical, Radiographic, and Histomorphometric Analysis of AstraTech Implant EV Placed and Immediately Provisionalized Into Preserved Alveolar Ridges: A Prospective 3-Year Outcomes Study
The revised purpose of this study is to compare and evaluate the stability of the implant body, survival rate, bone-level changes, and the implant's soft-tissue outcomes over a period of 1 year. Only 1 tooth is studied per participant.
In July of 2024, the revised protocol and revised Statistical Analysis plan were amended post-hoc, and the revised protocol and statistical analysis plan were approved by the IRB review committee in July of 2024.
As a result, the study has been terminated due to a change in the study's data analysis, and so the study will only analyze data up to and including the 1-year point.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Group 1: 3 months after ARP-SG, a dental implant will be placed using Azento® with an AstraTech Implant System EV and an immediate implant temporary crown using Azento®. After 3 months with the temporary crown, a definitive all-ceramic crown, made using a digital workflow will be placed.
Group 2: 6 months after ARP-SG, a dental implant will be placed using Azento® with an AstraTech Implant System EV and an immediate temporary crown using Azento®. After 3 months with the temporary crown, a definitive all-ceramic crown, made using a digital workflow will be placed.
Group 3: 9 months after ARP-SG, a dental implant will be placed using Azento® with an AstraTech Implant System EV and an immediate temporary crown using Azento®. After 3 months with the temporary crown, a definitive all-ceramic crown, made using a digital workflow will be placed.
SCREENING - Visit 1 After reading and signing the informed consent form, participants will complete a detailed medical and dental history form. The investigators will review the form with the participant to ensure they can safely participate in the study. Participants will also have an oral exam to determine if the participant qualifies for the study
VISIT 2: Abutment & Crown Placement Group 1 (TE + 14 weeks) Group 2 (TE + 26 weeks) Group 3 (TE + 38 weeks)
Intra-oral photographs of the sites of interest will be obtained. Participants may or may not have had their implant and bone core biopsy completed as part of their participation in IRB 201806050, Clinical, radiographic and histomorphotmetric analysis of healing dynamics in human extraction sockets grafted with Bio-Oss Collagen®: A prospective 3-year post-loading study or the participants routine clinical care. At the same visit when the implant is surgically installed, the investigators will then place a prosthetic abutment and temporary crown. Participants will also receive home care instructions before they leave. This visit will last about between 1.5 to 2 hours.
VISIT 3, 4, 5: Postop (2, 6, 12 week follow-ups after implant placement) Participants will return to the clinic at 2, 6 and 12 weeks which is standard of care in many cases for implant follow-up and restoration. At this time the investigators will update medical and dental histories. Photographs and intra-oral scans (multiple digital photographs) will be taken. The investigators will review any xrays on file to assess bone levels around the implant. Sutures will be removed. Participants will be asked some questions regarding their pain and level of satisfaction in addition to the healing status of their wound. The sites will be debrided (cleaned) and oral hygiene instructions will be reviewed. At visit 4 the shade of their new permanent crown will be selected. These visits will last approximately 30-60 minutes.
VISIT 6: Final Restoration Delivery (Implant Placement + 16 weeks) The investigators will update medical and dental histories. The abutment and crown will be examined. The temporary crown will be replaced with a permanent crown. Photographs and intra-oral scans (multiple digital photographs) will be taken. The participant will be asked some questions regarding pain and level of satisfaction in addition to the healing status of their wound. This visit will last approximately 60-90 minutes.
VISIT 7, 8 & 9: Implant Follow-ups #1, 2 & 3 (1, 2 & 3 years after delivery of final restoration) The participant will return to the clinic at 1, 2 and 3 years after delivery of the final restoration which is standard of care in many cases for implant restoration. At these times the investigators will update medical and dental histories . Photographs and intra-oral scans (multiple digital photographs) will be taken. An oral exam will be completed. Plaque will be removed if necessary, and oral hygiene instructions will be reviewed. Clinical measurements will be recorded. The investigators will review any xrays on file to assess bone levels around the implant. These visits will last approximately 60 minutes. Visit 9 will be the last visit.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Iowa
-
Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
- University of Iowa
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects may identify as either male, female, or intersex
- Age: 18 years or older
- Subjects with a healed, single-rooted tooth (except mandibular incisors) that has previously undergone ARP-SG with particulate allograft material within the past 2 months.
- Subjects must have stable occlusion, with absence of caries or other known acute pathology (i.e., untreated endodontic lesion, periodontal abscess, external/internal resorption, etc.) on teeth proximal to the implant site that would negatively influence implant outcomes
- Must be in adequate physical and mental health to undergo routine dental treatment including the surgical procedures associated tooth extraction and implant placement
- Subjects' treatment plan must include replacement of the tooth to be extracted with dental implant supported fixed restoration
- Subjects must have read, understood and signed an informed consent form
- Subjects must be willing to return for the required number of visits
- Subjects' tooth must be a permanent tooth, not a primary tooth (also known as baby tooth).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Mandibular incisors
- Acute infection associated with the tooth to be extracted or with adjacent teeth
- Unstable occlusion, presence of caries or other acute pathology on teeth adjacent to the implant site
- History of significant heart, stomach, liver, kidney, blood, immune system disease, or other organ impairment or systemic diseases that would prevent undergoing the proposed treatment or may result in compromised healing (e.g. poorly controlled diabetes, active heavy tobacco use [>10 cigs/day]), history of head/neck radiation, history of chemotherapy within the last 5 years
- Subjects with uncontrolled and/or severe metabolic bone diseases or disorders, such as osteoporosis, thyroid disorders or Paget's disease
- Subjects taking any medication or supplement known to largely influence bone metabolism, such as IV bisphosphonates, long-term history of oral bisphosphonates or chronic intake of glucocorticoids
- Pregnant women or nursing mothers
- Subjects that are unwilling or unable to sign the informed consent
- History of lack of compliance with dental visits
- Subjects unwilling to return for the required number of visits
- Subject currently undergoing orthodontic treatment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Implant Placement and Temporary Crown using AstraTech Implant System EV, Final Crown Delivery
|
At least 3 months after tooth removal and bone grafting, a dental implant will be placed using Azento, a commercially-available product that uses computer technology to plan the dental implant placement using the AstraTech Implant System EV and an immediate implant temporary crown using Azento.
After 3 months with the temporary crown, a definitive all-ceramic crown, made using a digital workflow will be placed.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants That Had an Implant That Survived 1 Year After Permanent Final Crown Placement.
Time Frame: 1 year after permanent final crown placement
|
For participants that had permanent restoration of the final crown performed, this outcome is determined via clinical evaluation of the percentage of participants that still had their 1 implant in place after 1 year of having the permanent final crown placement.
Note: Only 1 implant was placed per participant.
|
1 year after permanent final crown placement
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
% of vital bone via histomorphotmetric evaluation of bone core biopsies at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months
|
% of vital bone
|
3 months
|
|
% of vital bone via histomorphotmetric evaluation of bone core biopsies at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
% of vital bone
|
6 months
|
|
% of vital bone via histomorphotmetric evaluation of bone core biopsies at 9 months
Time Frame: 9 months
|
% of vital bone
|
9 months
|
|
Insertion torque values
Time Frame: 3 months
|
resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measured by implant stability quotient (ISQ)
|
3 months
|
|
Insertion torque values
Time Frame: 6 months
|
resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measured by implant stability quotient (ISQ)
|
6 months
|
|
Insertion torque values
Time Frame: 9 months
|
resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measured by implant stability quotient (ISQ)
|
9 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Christopher Barwacz, DDS, University of Iowa
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Furhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):639-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x.
- Araujo MG, Liljenberg B, Lindhe J. Dynamics of Bio-Oss Collagen incorporation in fresh extraction wounds: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jan;21(1):55-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01854.x.
- Avila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S, Kramer KW, Blanchette D, Dawson DV. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014 Oct;93(10):950-8. doi: 10.1177/0022034514541127. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
- Jung RE, Philipp A, Annen BM, Signorelli L, Thoma DS, Hammerle CH, Attin T, Schmidlin P. Radiographic evaluation of different techniques for ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Jan;40(1):90-8. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12027. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
- Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Drisko C, Bohra AA, Scheetz JP. Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol. 2003 Jul;74(7):990-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.990.
- Nevins M, Camelo M, De Paoli S, Friedland B, Schenk RK, Parma-Benfenati S, Simion M, Tinti C, Wagenberg B. A study of the fate of the buccal wall of extraction sockets of teeth with prominent roots. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006 Feb;26(1):19-29.
- Alkan EA, Parlar A, Yildirim B, Senguven B. Histological comparison of healing following tooth extraction with ridge preservation using enamel matrix derivatives versus Bio-Oss Collagen: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;42(12):1522-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.06.002. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
- Araujo M, Linder E, Wennstrom J, Lindhe J. The influence of Bio-Oss Collagen on healing of an extraction socket: an experimental study in the dog. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008 Apr;28(2):123-35.
- Araujo MG, da Silva JCC, de Mendonca AF, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following grafting of fresh extraction sockets in man. A randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Apr;26(4):407-412. doi: 10.1111/clr.12366. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
- Barone A, Aldini NN, Fini M, Giardino R, Calvo Guirado JL, Covani U. Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: a clinical and histomorphometric study. J Periodontol. 2008 Aug;79(8):1370-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070628.
- Heberer S, Al-Chawaf B, Hildebrand D, Nelson JJ, Nelson K. Histomorphometric analysis of extraction sockets augmented with Bio-Oss Collagen after a 6-week healing period: a prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Dec;19(12):1219-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01617.x. No abstract available.
- Heinemann F, Hasan I, Schwahn C, Bourauel C, Mundt T. Bone level change of extraction sockets with Bio-Oss collagen and implant placement: a clinical study. Ann Anat. 2012 Nov;194(6):508-12. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2011.11.012. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
- Lekovic V, Kenney EB, Weinlaender M, Han T, Klokkevold P, Nedic M, Orsini M. A bone regenerative approach to alveolar ridge maintenance following tooth extraction. Report of 10 cases. J Periodontol. 1997 Jun;68(6):563-70. doi: 10.1902/jop.1997.68.6.563.
- Nart J, Barallat L, Jimenez D, Mestres J, Gomez A, Carrasco MA, Violant D, Ruiz-Magaz V. Radiographic and histological evaluation of deproteinized bovine bone mineral vs. deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen in ridge preservation. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Jul;28(7):840-848. doi: 10.1111/clr.12889. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
- Roccuzzo M, Gaudioso L, Lungo M, Dalmasso P. Surgical therapy of single peri-implantitis intrabony defects, by means of deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen. J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Mar;43(3):311-8. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12516. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
- Scheyer ET, Heard R, Janakievski J, Mandelaris G, Nevins ML, Pickering SR, Richardson CR, Pope B, Toback G, Velasquez D, Nagursky H. A randomized, controlled, multicentre clinical trial of post-extraction alveolar ridge preservation. J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Dec;43(12):1188-1199. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12623. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
- Su H, Gonzalez-Martin O, Weisgold A, Lee E. Considerations of implant abutment and crown contour: critical contour and subcritical contour. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010 Aug;30(4):335-43.
- Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada J. Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: 1-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Jan-Feb;18(1):31-9.
- Arora H, Khzam N, Roberts D, Bruce WL, Ivanovski S. Immediate implant placement and restoration in the anterior maxilla: Tissue dimensional changes after 2-5 year follow up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Aug;19(4):694-702. doi: 10.1111/cid.12487. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
- Barwacz, C. & Hernandez, M. (2013) Maximizing Esthetics of Fixed Interim Restorations via Direct Extrinsic Characterization. Journal of Cosmetic Dentistry 29, 122-131.
- Barwacz CA, Pantzlaff E, Allareddy V, Avila-Ortiz G. Graduate Periodontics Programs' Integration of Implant Provisionalization in Core Curricula: Implementation of CODA Standard 4-10.2.d. J Dent Educ. 2017 Jun;81(6):696-706. doi: 10.21815/JDE.016.033.
- Barwacz CA, Stanford CM, Diehl UA, Cooper LF, Feine J, McGuire M, Scheyer ET. Pink Esthetic Score Outcomes Around Three Implant-Abutment Configurations: 3-Year Results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Sep/Oct;33(5):1126-1135. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6659.
- Cooper LF, Reside G, Stanford C, Barwacz C, Feine J, Nader SA, Scheyer T, McGuire M. Three-Year Prospective Randomized Comparative Assessment of Anterior Maxillary Single Implants with Different Abutment Interfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 Jan/Feb;34(1):150-158. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6810.
- Cooper LF, Tarnow D, Froum S, Moriarty J, De Kok IJ. Comparison of Marginal Bone Changes with Internal Conus and External Hexagon Design Implant Systems: A Prospective, Randomized Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016 Sep-Oct;36(5):631-42. doi: 10.11607/prd.2433.
- Crespi R, Cappare P, Crespi G, Gastaldi G, Romanos GE, Gherlone E. Tissue Remodeling in Immediate Versus Delayed Prosthetic Restoration in Fresh Socket Implants in the Esthetic Zone: Four-Year Follow-up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018;38(Suppl):s97-s103. doi: 10.11607/prd.3123. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
- De Rouck T, Collys K, Wyn I, Cosyn J. Instant provisionalization of immediate single-tooth implants is essential to optimize esthetic treatment outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jun;20(6):566-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01674.x. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
- Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Umezu K, Kois JC. Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: an evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans. J Periodontol. 2003 Apr;74(4):557-62. doi: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.4.557.
- Noelken R, Oberhansl F, Kunkel M, Wagner W. Immediately provisionalized OsseoSpeed() Profile implants inserted into extraction sockets: 3-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Jun;27(6):744-9. doi: 10.1111/clr.12651. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
- Ponsi J, Lahti S, Rissanen H, Oikarinen K. Change in subjective oral health after single dental implant treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):571-7.
- Raes F, Cooper LF, Tarrida LG, Vandromme H, De Bruyn H. A case-control study assessing oral-health-related quality of life after immediately loaded single implants in healed alveolar ridges or extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 May;23(5):602-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02178.x. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
- Spyropoulou PE, Razzoog M, Sierraalta M. Restoring implants in the esthetic zone after sculpting and capturing the periimplant tissues in rest position: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Dec;102(6):345-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60189-X.
- Stanford CM, Barwacz C, Raes S, De Bruyn H, Cecchinato D, Bittner N, Brandt J. Multicenter Clinical Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluation of an Implant System Designed for Enhanced Primary Stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):906-15. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4869.
- Strietzel FP, Neumann K, Hertel M. Impact of platform switching on marginal peri-implant bone-level changes. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Mar;26(3):342-58. doi: 10.1111/clr.12339. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 201911024
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Tooth Loss
-
Erasmus Medical CenterUniversity Medical Center Groningen; University of Santiago de CompostelaRecruitingTooth Loss / RehabilitationNetherlands
-
Institut Straumann AGCompleted
-
University of BelgradeInstitute Straumann AG, Basel, SwitzerlandActive, not recruitingTooth Loss / Rehabilitation | MaxillaSerbia
-
Universidad Complutense de MadridRecruitingPartial Edentulism | Tooth Loss / RehabilitationSpain
-
Murad AlrashidiNot yet recruitingSpace Maintenance | Tooth Loss / RehabilitationSaudi Arabia
-
Duygu KarasanHacettepe UniversityCompleted
-
University of AarhusCompleted
-
University of GuarulhosCompletedTooth Decay | Tooth Loss / Rehabilitation | Caries Active
-
Akdeniz UniversityCompletedAlveolar Bone Loss | Tooth Loss / RehabilitationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingLoss of Teeth Due to ExtractionEgypt
Clinical Trials on Implant Placement and Temporary Crown using AstraTech Implant System EV, Final Crown Delivery
-
Columbia UniversityCompletedGingival Recession | Bone Loss, Alveolar
-
Tomas LinkeviciusLithuanian University of Health SciencesNot yet recruitingImmediate Dental Implant Loading | Marginal Bone Levels | Immediate Dental Implant Placement
-
Mahidol UniversityAlign Technology, Inc.Completed
-
Mahidol UniversityITI International Team for Implantology, SwitzerlandCompleted
-
Hams Hamed AbdelrahmanCompletedAnterior Maxillary Narrow RidgeEgypt
-
University of ValenciaActive, not recruitingPeri-implant Soft Tissue Healing | Soft Tissue Management in Subcrestal Dental Implants | Healing Abutment Influence on Gingival VolumeSpain
-
Semmelweis UniversityRecruitingEdentulous Alveolar Ridge Atrophy | Edentulous Alveolar RidgeHungary