Efficacy of Ericksonian Hypnosis in the Management of Chronic Pain Related to Parkinson's Disease (DOLHYP-PARK-1)

December 4, 2025 updated by: University Hospital, Lille
This study evaluates the efficacity of Erickson hypnosis in the treatment of chronic pain in patients with Parkinson's disease. Half of participants will follow a 2-month Erickson hypnosis protocole, while the other half will benefit from the usual care.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A large proportion of patients with Parkinson's disease suffer of chronic pain directly related to the disease. The management of painful symptoms is difficult and currently, there is no commonly admitted guidelines.

Several studies have shown the efficacy of Erickson hypnosis to reduce the perception of chronic pain in different conditions. This efficacy has never been tested in Parkinson's disease.

The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of Erickson hypnosis protocol, compared to usual care, for the management of Parkinson's disease-related chronic pain.

The study team assume that Erickson hypnosis will be more efficient than usual care to reduce perceived chronic pain. They also assume that regular practice of autohypnosis will contribute to long-term efficacy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Caen, France
        • CHU Côte de Nacre
      • Lille, France, 59800
        • Hopital Roger Salengro, CHRU de Lille
      • Rouen, France
        • Hopital Charles Nicolle Chu Rouen
      • Toulouse, France, 31300
        • Hopital PURPAN CHU Toulouse

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men or women
  • 18 to 80 years old
  • idiopathic Parkinson's disease
  • without neurological co-morbidity
  • Suffering from chronic pain (for at least 3 months), related to Parkinson's disease
  • Having a pain intensity of at least 30 mm on the VAS (average intensity over the previous week) for Parkinson's disease-related pain
  • antiparkinsonian, analgesic and psychotropic treatments stable for 1-month
  • having a health insurance
  • signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with a neurological condition other than Parkinson's disease or with an atypical Parkinson's syndrome
  • Early untreated patient
  • Patient with acute intercurrent pain
  • Patient whose pain is mainly attributable to another pathology (rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis ankylosing, diabetic neuropathy, cancer, etc.)
  • Patient with cognitive impairment objectified by a score at the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) <24
  • Patient with hallucinations and/or psychosis (MDS-UPDRS 1.2> 1)
  • Patient with a apathy (MDS-UPDRS 1.5> 1)
  • Patient with disabling dyskinesia (MDS-UPDRS) 4.1 AND 4.2> 1)
  • Patient under the protection of adults
  • Pregnant or lactating woman

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Erickson hypnosis
5 sessions of Erickson hypnosis (1 session per week), associated with autohypnosis at home in-between sessions.
Erickson hypnosis sessions performed by an experienced hypnotherapist, according to a pre-established protocol : 5 sessions (1 per week). Between each session : exercise of auto-hypnosis by the patient himself, at home
No Intervention: Usual care
Usual management of pain symptoms

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of the intensity of pain perception
Time Frame: At baseline and 2 months after
Measure of the intensity of pain perception by VAS at the baseline visit and at the post-treatment visit (2 months later). The difference between both values will allow to calculate a variation index.
At baseline and 2 months after

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of the score at the Brief Pain Inventory
Time Frame: At baseline and 2 months after
Completion of the Brief Pain Inventory at the baseline visit and at the post-treatment visit (2 months later). The difference between both scores will allow to calculate a variation index.
At baseline and 2 months after
Change of the score at the McGill Pain Questionnaire
Time Frame: At baseline and 2 months after
Completion of the McGill Pain Questionnaire at the baseline visit and at the post-treatment visit (2 months later). The difference between both scores will allow to calculate a variation index.
At baseline and 2 months after
Change of the score at the Beck Depression Inventory
Time Frame: At baseline and 2 months after
Completion of the Beck Depression Inventory at the baseline visit and at the post-treatment visit (2 months later). The difference between both scores will allow to calculate a variation index.
At baseline and 2 months after
Change of the score at the Fatigue Severity Scale
Time Frame: At baseline and 2 months after
Completion of the Fatigue Severity Scale at the baseline visit and at the post-treatment visit (2 months later). The difference between both scores will allow to calculate a variation index.
At baseline and 2 months after
Change of the score at the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-8 (PDQ-8)
Time Frame: At baseline and 2 months after
Completion of the PDQ-8 at the baseline visit and at the post-treatment visit (2 months later). The difference between both scores will allow to calculate a variation index.
At baseline and 2 months after
Change of the score at the Scale for Outcomes at Parkinson's Disease (SCOPA-PS)
Time Frame: At baseline and 2 months after
Completion of the SCOPA-PS at the baseline visit and at the post-treatment visit (2 months later). The difference between both scores will allow to calculate a variation index.
At baseline and 2 months after
Change of the score at the Euroqol 5 dimensions 5 levels (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: At baseline and 2 months after
Completion of the EQ-5D-5L at the baseline visit and at the post-treatment visit (2 months later). The difference between both scores will allow to calculate a variation index.
At baseline and 2 months after
Change in the dose of analgesic treatments
Time Frame: At baseline and 2 months after
Analgesic treatments will be recorded during the week preceding each visit and a mean dosage will be calculated during each period. The difference between both mean values will allow to calculate a variation index.
At baseline and 2 months after
Change in the dose of psychotropic medications
Time Frame: At baseline and 2 months after
Psychotropic medications will be recorded during the week preceding each visit and a mean dosage will be calculated during each period. The difference between both mean values will allow to calculate a variation index.
At baseline and 2 months after
Change of the score at MDS-UPDRS
Time Frame: At baseline and 2 months after
Completion of the MDS-UPDRS at the baseline visit and at the post-treatment visit (2 months later). The difference between both scores will allow to calculate a variation index.
At baseline and 2 months after

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Luc Defebvre, MD,PhD, University Hospital, Lille

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 8, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 16, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 16, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Erickson hypnosis

Subscribe