Intention Treatment for Anomia

October 21, 2025 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Intention Treatment for Anomia: Investigating Dose Frequency Effects and Predictors of Treatment Response to Improve Efficacy and Clinical Translation

Every year approximately 15,000 Veterans are hospitalized for stroke, and up to 40% of those Veterans will experience stroke-related language impairment (i.e., aphasia). Stroke-induced aphasia results in increased healthcare costs and decreased quality of life. As the population of Veterans continues to age, there will be an increasing number for Veterans living with the aphasia and its consequences. Those Veterans deserve to receive aphasia treatment designed to facilitate the best possible outcomes. In the proposed study, the investigators will investigate optimal treatment intensity and predictors of treatment response for a novel word retrieval treatment. The knowledge the investigators gain will have direct implications for the selecting the right treatment approach for the right Veteran.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Difficulty retrieving words is one of the most common language complaints in individuals with stroke-induced aphasia. The negative consequences related to word retrieval impairment include increased health care costs and decreased quality of life. A variety of treatment approaches exist to improve word retrieval, and most of the treatments result in immediate improvement on trained words. However, long-term improvement and improvement on untrained words or behaviors is less common. Additionally, the investigators currently know very little about optimal treatment administration parameters, and the investigators know even less about predictors of treatment response. To make the best use of the limited clinical resources available for aphasia treatment, and to maximize outcomes for Veterans with aphasia, the investigators must: 1) develop clinically translatable treatments that yield widespread and lasting effects and 2) develop clinically accessible ways of identifying who will acquire benefit from a specific treatment approach. This study takes on these two challenges by investigating dose frequency (massed vs. distributed practice) effects and by identifying the language, cognitive and neural predictors of response to Intention treatment (INT), a novel word retrieval treatment. Specifically, the investigators will address the following aims:

Aim 1: To investigate dose frequency effects on maintenance and generalization of INT gains. Outcome measure: Word retrieval accuracy for trained and untrained words.

Aim 2: To identify the language and cognitive variables that predict response to m-INT vs. d-INT. Outcome measure: Language and cognitive ability as measured by standardized assessments.

Aim 3: To identify the neural predictors of response to m-INT vs. d-INT. Outcome measure: Tissue health and task activation location as measured by structural and functional MRI.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30033-4004
        • Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur, GA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English as primary language
  • > 6 months post-onset a left-hemisphere stroke. Multiple strokes are acceptable as long as they are confined to the left hemisphere.
  • Diagnosis of aphasia
  • Presence of word retrieval deficits
  • Adequate comprehension as judged by ability to complete two-step commands on the Western Aphasia Battery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe apraxia of speech or dysarthria
  • Clinically significant depression
  • For MRI safety: implanted medical devices, metal in the body and claustrophobia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Massed Intention Treatment (massed-INT)
Participants will receive 30 hours of Intention Treatment (INT) over 3 weeks.
Word retrieval treatment for aphasia that engages right hemisphere intention mechanisms using a left-hand circular gesture.
Active Comparator: Distributed Intention Treatment (distributed-INT)
Participants will receive 30 hours of Intention Treatment (INT) over 12 weeks.
Word retrieval treatment for aphasia that engages right hemisphere intention mechanisms using a left-hand circular gesture.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of correctly named pictures
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months; Change from baseline to 3 weeks (post massed-INT) or 12 weeks (post distributed-INT), change at 3 months post-treatment, change at 6 months post-treatment
Change in the ability to correctly name 10 trained and 10 untrained pictures will be measured at 4 time points
Through study completion, an average of 6 months; Change from baseline to 3 weeks (post massed-INT) or 12 weeks (post distributed-INT), change at 3 months post-treatment, change at 6 months post-treatment
Number of correctly generated category members
Time Frame: Through study study completion, an average of 6 months; Change from baseline to 3 weeks (post m-INT) or 12 weeks (post d-INT), change at 3 months post-treatment, change at 6 months post-treatment
Change in the ability to correctly name 5 trained and 5 untrained category members will be measured at 4 time points
Through study study completion, an average of 6 months; Change from baseline to 3 weeks (post m-INT) or 12 weeks (post d-INT), change at 3 months post-treatment, change at 6 months post-treatment
Western Aphasia Battery
Time Frame: Baseline
This standardized assessment will be administered at baseline to investigate language predictors of treatment outcome
Baseline
Boston Naming Test
Time Frame: Baseline
This standardized assessment will be administered at baseline to investigate language predictors of treatment outcome
Baseline
Test of Everyday Attention
Time Frame: Baseline
This standardized assessment will be administered at baseline to investigate cognitive predictors of treatment outcome.
Baseline
Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised
Time Frame: Baseline
This standardized assessment will be administered at baseline to investigate cognitive predictors of treatment outcome.
Baseline
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised
Time Frame: Baseline
This standardized assessment will be administered at baseline to investigate cognitive predictors of treatment outcome.
Baseline
Digit Span Backwards
Time Frame: Baseline
This standardized assessment will be administered at baseline to investigate cognitive predictors of treatment outcome.
Baseline
Structural MRI scan
Time Frame: Baseline
Tissue health (from structural scan) will be obtained at baseline to investigate neural predictors of treatment outcome.
Baseline
Functional MRI scan
Time Frame: Baseline
Task-based activation location (from functional MRI scans) will be obtained at baseline to investigate neural predictors of treatment outcome.
Baseline
Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Sorting
Time Frame: Baseline
This standardized assessment will be administered at baseline to investigate cognitive predictors of treatment outcome.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Trails
Time Frame: Baseline
This standardized assessment will be administered at baseline to investigate cognitive predictors of treatment outcome.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amy D. Rodriguez, PhD, Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur, GA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 24, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Intention Treatment for Anomia

Subscribe