Treating Intention In Aphasia: Neuroplastic Substrates

April 30, 2012 updated by: University of Florida
The purpose of this study is to determine if an "intentional act" improves treatment response for patients with nonfluent aphasia. The treatment involves naming pictures and saying members of categories. The "intentional act" requires initiating picture naming or category member trials with a left-hand movement sequence. Nonfluent aphasia is a disorder of language production in which patients with damage to the brain's language system have trouble initiating and maintaining spoken communication. All patients participating in the study take part in functional MRI scans to determine how treatments affect brain systems.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A new treatment manipulating intention substrates for language production in "nonfluent" aphasia patients was developed. The intention component involves initiating word-finding trials with a complex left-hand movement. The study addresses (1) whether or not the intention manipulation (complex left-hand movement) makes a unique contribution to treatment outcome and (2) whether or not the intention manipulation helps to shift word production mechanisms from the left to the right frontal lobe. All study participants take part in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans of word-finding before and after treatment and at 3-month follow-up to measure changes in lateralization of frontal lobe activity during word finding. Only patients with a substantial degree of left frontal activity on the pre-treatment fMRI scan can participate. There are three specific aims: (1) to determine if repetitive initiation of word production with a complex left-hand movement leads to increased right-hemisphere lateralization of frontal activity and if these changes can be attributed to the intention component of treatment, (2) to determine whether activity in posterior perisylvian cortices that is entrained to right frontal activity shows a greater increase in right-hemisphere lateralization from pre- to post-treatment fMRI when the intention component is included in treatment, and (3) to determine whether onset of hemodynamic responses (HDRs) in right motor/premotor cortex becomes more closely associated with the temporal onset of participants' spoken responses across treatment when the intention component is included in treatment. If successful, the treatment can provide a new treatment vehicle for increasing language function in patients with "nonfluent" aphasia.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • University of Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32216
        • Brooks Center for Rehabilitation Studies
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32209
        • University of Florida/Shands Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 95 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Nonfluent aphasia caused by stroke
  • Moderate to severe word-finding problems
  • 6 or more months post stroke
  • Right handed prior to stroke
  • All strokes in left hemisphere
  • Native English speaker
  • Capable of following verbal directions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe impairment of word comprehension
  • Brain injury or disease in addition to stroke
  • Drug or alcohol abuse within past 6 months
  • Schizophrenia or other psychiatric disorder necessitating hospitalization
  • History of learning disability
  • Claustrophobia
  • Cardiac pace-maker
  • Ferrous metal implants not attached to bone, metal fragments in body
  • Profound hearing loss

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Word-finding with intention component
Treats word-finding (picture naming, category member generation) with an intention manipulation (complex left-hand movement to initiate word-finding trials)
Word-finding trials (picture-naming) with intention manipulation (initiating word-finding trials with a complex left-hand movement). 8 (or more) baseline sessions over 4 days followed by 30 treatment sessions (2 sessions/day, 5 days/week for 3 weeks).
Other Names:
  • Intention Treatment
Active Comparator: Word-finding with no intention component
Word-finding trials similar to intention mediated treatment, but without intention manipulation
Word-finding trials with no intention manipulation. 8 (or more) baseline sessions in 4 days followed by 30 treatment sessions (2 sessions/day, 5 days/week for 3 weeks).
Other Names:
  • Control Treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lateralization of Frontal Lobe (and Posterior Perisylvian) Activity During Word Production
Time Frame: immediately post-treatment scan minus pre-treatment baseline scan
Functional MRI laterality indices (LIs)were calculated for lateral frontal, medial frontal, and posterior perisylvian cortex regions of interest (ROIs): L=number of active voxels in left hemisphere ROI and R=number of active voxels in right hemisphere ROI using the following formula: (L-R)/(L+R). LIs could vary from -1 (completely right lateralized) to +1 (completely left lateralized). Then, change in LIs was calculated by subtracting the pre-treatment from the post-treatment and 3-mo follow-up LI. It was expected the intention manipulation would show a rightward shift in LI.
immediately post-treatment scan minus pre-treatment baseline scan

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Picture Naming Probe Scores (% Accuracy)
Time Frame: trend for time series of 8 baseline + 30 treatment sessions
Improvement for the time series from 8 baseline sessions through 30 treatment sessions for naming probes was computed with the C statistic using Tryon's (1982, 1983) formula for each subject. C statistics were converted to Z scores, using the formula provided by Tryon (1982). Z scores indicated treatment change for each subject, with a positive and significant Z score indicating substantive treatment gains. Z scores were then compared between groups with a t statistic. It was expected that the intention manipulation would lead to greater treatment gains than when it was not used.
trend for time series of 8 baseline + 30 treatment sessions
Category Member Generation Probe Scores (% Accuracy)
Time Frame: trend for time series of 8 baseline + 30 treatment sessions
Improvement for the time series from 8 baseline sessions through 30 treatment sessions for naming probes was computed with the C statistic using Tryon's (1982, 1983) formula for each subject. C statistics were converted to Z scores, using the formula provided by Tryon (1982). Z scores indicated treatment change for each subject, with a positive and significant Z score indicating substantive treatment gains. Z scores were then compared between groups with a t statistic. It was expected that the intention manipulation would lead to greater treatment gains than when it was not used.
trend for time series of 8 baseline + 30 treatment sessions

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bruce Crosson, PhD, University of Florida

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

December 4, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 3, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2012

Last Verified

April 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aphasia

  • Teachers College, Columbia University
    Recruiting
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia Non Fluent | Aphasia, Anomic | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Aphasia, Mixed | Aphasia, Expressive | Aphasia, Conduction | Aphasia, Rehabilitation
    United States
  • University of South Carolina
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Completed
    Stroke | Aphasia | Stroke, Ischemic | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia, Anomic | Aphasia, Global | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia, Mixed | Aphasia, Jargon | Aphasia, Expressive | Aphasia, Conduction
    United States
  • Maya Henry
    National Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute on Aging (NIA)
    Recruiting
    Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (svPPA) | Nonfluent Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (nfvPPA) | Progressive Aphasia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia... and other conditions
    United States
  • University of California, Berkeley
    University of California, San Francisco; National Institute on Deafness and... and other collaborators
    Recruiting
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Aphasia, Non-fluent | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia Following Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage
    United States
  • Maya Henry
    National Institute on Aging (NIA)
    Recruiting
    Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia | Progressive Aphasia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia (LPA) | Primary Progressive Aphasia(PPA) | Logopenic Variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia (LPA) | Progressive Aphasia in Alzheimer's Disease
    United States
  • University of Texas at Austin
    University of California, San Francisco; National Institute on Deafness and...
    Active, not recruiting
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Aphasia | Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Memory Disorder | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Aphasia, Progressive
    United States
  • University of Texas at Austin
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Enrolling by invitation
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Aphasia | Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Memory Disorder | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Aphasia, Progressive
    United States
  • Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia
    Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona.; Universitat Pompeu Fabra
    Completed
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia, Wernicke | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia, Nonfluent
    Spain
  • Flint Rehabilitation Devices, LLC
    University of Texas
    Completed
    Broca Aphasia
    United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Recruiting
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Apraxia of Speech | PPA | Non-fluent Aphasia | Primary Progressive Non-fluent Aphasia
    United States

Clinical Trials on Word-finding with intention component

Subscribe