Liver and Metabolic Effects of Insulin Pump Therapy in Diabetics Type 2 With Non-alcoholic Hepatic Steatosis (STEATO-POMPE)

March 22, 2021 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Liver and Metabolic Effects of Insulin Pump Therapy in a Population of Type 2 Diabetics With Non-alcoholic Hepatic Steatosis

The prevalence of fatty liver disease (NAFLD: Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease or to a more severe degree NASH: Non-Alcoholic SteatoHepatitis) reached 40-70% in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D). NAFLD can be easily detected by performing a hepatic ultrasonography. The presence of a NAFLD is positively correlated with the severity of insulin resistance and dysglycemia in this population. The presence of NAFLD worsens the prognosis of T2D with an increased cardiovascular risk. This hepatic impairment would also increase the risk of microvascular complications, especially nephropathy. Conversely, T2D increases the risk of transition from NAFLD to NASH and then to hepatic fibrosis and its related complications (cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma). The risk of progression of liver steatosis to fibrosis is also more important as diabetes and insulin resistance are more severe.

In addition to diabetes and insulin resistance, other risk factors are associated with more severe liver damage such as changes in microbiota. Indeed, it has already been described a smaller amount of bacteroides in the microbiota of subjects with T2D and the most severe hepatic impairment. The treatment of NAFLD/NASH is poorly codified without approved drugs in this indication, while many phase 3 trials with candidate drugs are undergoing. Life-style measures (physical activity and low carbohydrate/calorie diet) can limit the progression from NAFLD to more severe liver fibrosis. Some bariatric surgery studies have also shown good results in this situation. Pharmacological interventions are also reported with proven efficacy of pioglitazone, vitamin E and orlistat.

The OPT2MISE study has recently shown the superiority of insulin pump (or continuous sub-cutaneous insulin infusion: CSII) compared to multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) to improve glycemic control in a population of patients with T2D in failure of well-titrated MDI. In addition, treatment with CSII showed a 45% decrease in insulin resistance (assessed by HOMA-IR) in a population of newly diagnosed T2D.

In light of these data, investigators hypothesize that the introduction of insulin pump treatment in a population of subjects with T2D and NAFLD, by improving insulin sensitivity, could reduce fatty liver content compared to standard MDI treatment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Angers, France, 49933
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Claire BRIET
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Claire BRIET
      • Caen, France, 14033
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michaël JOUBERT, MD
      • Dijon, France, 21000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jean-Michel PETIT
        • Contact:
          • Jean-Michel Petit, MD
          • Phone Number: 05.46.45.51.31
      • La Rochette, France, 17019
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Didier GOUET, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Didier GOUET, MD
      • Lyon, France, 69495
        • Recruiting
        • Hospices Civils
        • Contact:
          • Cyrielle CAUSSY, MD
          • Phone Number: 04 78 86 14 89
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Cyrielle CAUSSY, MD
      • Nantes, France, 44093
      • Poitiers, France, 86000
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Xavier PIGUEL, MD
          • Phone Number: 05.49.44.40.34
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Xavier PIGUEL
      • Rennes, France, 35203
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU de Rennes
        • Contact:
          • Isabelle GUILHEM, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Isabelle GUILHEM, MD
      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • Recruiting
        • CHU
        • Contact:
          • Pierre Gourdy, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pierre GOURDY, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 68 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male / female 35/70 years (including ranges) with T2D ≥ 1 year
  • Benefiting from the indication of use of the free Freestyle glucose meter
  • Treatment with multi-injection insulin therapy comprising a daily injection of basal insulin (Glargine U100, Glargine U300, Degludec) and at least 2 daily injections of an insulin analogue (lispro, aspart or glulisine) +/- metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) and/or sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) at a dose stable for at least 3 months.
  • For women of childbearing age, oestro-progestative pill, IUD, implant.
  • 11% ≥ HbA1c ≥ 6.5%
  • Presence of hepatic steatosis according to the ultrasonography
  • Absence of chronic alcoholic intoxication
  • Absence of chronic viral hepatitis or other chronic liver diseases (eg hemochromatosis ...)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Type 1 diabetes
  • Contraindication to pump treatment
  • Treatment with anti-diabetics or other than metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) and/or sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2)
  • Treatment with basal inulin of Levemir
  • Contraindication to performing MRI
  • Chronic alcohol abuse (after alcohol consumption> 20g / day in men and> 10g / day in women) according to the medical examination
  • Chronic viral hepatitis based on HBV and HCV serology results
  • Hemochromatosis according to the martial assessment
  • Other toxic or drug hepatitis
  • Severe hepatic pathology: hepatic cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Severe renal insufficiency (MDRD <30 ml / min)
  • Severe and progressive cardiovascular pathology
  • Treatment (permanent or intermittent) with glucocorticoids
  • Treatment known to improve hepatic steatosis (glitazone, vitamin E, orlistat)
  • history or bariatric surgery project for the duration of the study
  • Drug treatment likely to cause hepatic steatosis (amiodarone, carbamazepine, tamoxifen, valproate, clozapine, anti-retroviral drugs) unless the dose has been stable for ≥ 3 months
  • Guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Insulin pump therapy
5-day hospitalization in case of randomization in the insulin pump group (insulin pump establishing in according to the recommendations of the HAS)
Active Comparator: Multi-injection treatment ( MDI ).
Corresponds to an outpatient visit if the patient is randomized into the multi-injection group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Variation of hepatic steatosis, between the insulin pump therapy (CSII) vs Multi injection treatement (MDI) groups.
Time Frame: 6 months
Change of fatty liver by MRI quantification
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
In the CSII group : avantage of an insulin pump treatment on the fatty liver between inclusion and the 6th month,
Time Frame: 6 months
Variation of hepatic steatosis (MRI quantization by gradient echo sequences & centralized reading
6 months
In the CSII group : avantage of an insulin pump treatment on the fatty liver (quantified by MRI), between inclusion and the 12th month,
Time Frame: 12 months
Variation of hepatic steatosis (MRI quantization by gradient echo sequences & centralized reading
12 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months, on hepatic biological parameters and non-invasive biomarkers of fatty liver (FLI) and of fibrosis of the liver (FIB-4 and NAFLD Score),
Time Frame: 6 months
Liver fonction (AST ; ALAT ; GGT ; PAL ; Ferritin) Test-fibrosis score criteria (FIB- 4 and NAFLD Score) ; FLI
6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on insulin sensitivity
Time Frame: 6 months
dosage of plasma adiponectin
6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on insulin sensitivity
Time Frame: 6 months
calculation of the modified HOMA-IR index (peptide C, blood sugar),
6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on glycemic balance
Time Frame: 6 months
HbA1c dosages
6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on the total daily insulin dose
Time Frame: 6 months
daily insulin dose record
6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on lipid profile • the inflammatory condition
Time Frame: 6 months
total cholesterol
6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on lipid profile • the inflammatory condition
Time Frame: 6 months
LDL-cholesterol
6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on lipid profile • the inflammatory condition
Time Frame: 6 months
HDL-cholesterol
6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on lipid profile • the inflammatory condition
Time Frame: 6 months
triglycerides (TG)
6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on lipid profile • the inflammatory condition
Time Frame: 6 months
fatty-free acids
6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on lipid profile • the inflammatory condition
Time Frame: 6 months
ApoB,
6 months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a CSII vs MDI treatment, between randomization and 6 months on CRPus
Time Frame: 6 months
Ultra-sensitive C-reactive protein (CRPus)
6 months
Evaluation of quality of life
Time Frame: 6 months
DTSQ
6 months
Evaluation of quality of life
Time Frame: 6 months
SF36
6 months
Safety analysis at 6 months: comparison the first 6 months, in the CSII and MDI groups:
Time Frame: 6 months
Reporting by patient of all severe hypoglycemia during the study
6 months
Safety analysis at 6 months: comparison the first 6 months, in the CSII and MDI groups:
Time Frame: 6 months
Reporting by the patient of all episode of ketoacidosis during the study
6 months
Calculation of the sensitivity values of the FLI for the detection of fatty liver in this population,
Time Frame: 6 months
quantification of hepatic MRI as Gold Standard.
6 months
Calculation of the specificity values of the FLI for the detection of fatty liver in this population, by using the quantification of hepatic MRI as Gold Standard.
Time Frame: 6 months
quantification of hepatic MRI as Gold Standard.
6 months
Calculation of the positive predictive values of the FLI for the detection of fatty liver in this population, by using the quantification of hepatic MRI as Gold Standard.
Time Frame: 6 months
quantification of hepatic MRI as Gold Standard.
6 months
Calculation negative predictive values of the FLI for the detection of fatty liver in this population, by using the quantification of hepatic MRI as Gold Standard.
Time Frame: 6 months
quantification of hepatic MRI as Gold Standard.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 5, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 5, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 5, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RC19_0449

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)

Clinical Trials on Insulin pump therapy

3
Subscribe