Effectiveness of Mobile-phone Career Competencies Intervention for Malaysian Public Sector Managers

March 30, 2021 updated by: Ho Hsin Hung, Universiti Putra Malaysia

Sequential Exploratory Mixed Method in Developing and Evaluating the Effectiveness of Mobile-phone Career Competencies Intervention for Malaysian Public Sector Managers

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a user and expert centric mobile phone-based career intervention program of career competencies among Malaysian public managers.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a user and expert centric mobile phone-based career intervention program of career competencies among Malaysian public managers. In this study, the Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) is adopted as the framework to develop mobile phone-based intervention for career competencies. There is two phases in the study whereby in Phase 1, a qualitative approach developing the components in the career intervention module and mobile phone application features. Phase 2 that evaluates the mobile phone-based career intervention program. Validation will be conducted to meet the objectives of (i) the usability of the mobile communication career intervention application (survey), and (ii) evaluation of the effectiveness of the intervention program for career competencies delivered through mobile phone application (randomized controlled trial). The primary outcome of this study is career competencies. The career competencies score will be compared between participants in the intervention and control group at the baseline, and follow-ups at week four and week 12 respectively, using mixed design ANOVA.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Putrajaya, Malaysia, 62510
        • Public Service Department Malaysia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be Administrative and Diplomatic Officers (ADO) who use mobile application (Android)
  • Must be in Grade 41
  • Informed consent obtained

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The officer that use IPhone
  • The officer that involved in disciplinary issues

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mobile Career Competencies Intervention
The intervention protocol has five main components and is designed in English language. The first component consists of an educational session. The second component focuses on one's reflection on motivation and qualities. The third component assists users in working out strategies with others. The fourth component prompts users to reflect on and narrate their emerging career stories through goal-setting identification activities. The fifth component includes the government's human resource practices, training programs offered, and policies. The fourth and fifth component require users to reflect on their work exploration and career control career competencies.
Mobile career competencies intervention aim to enhance the career competencies (career behavioral action) among the participants
No Intervention: Waitlist control
Waitlist control group attended work and basic training from the organization as usual. They only receive the mobile intervention after the intervention group completing of the intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effectiveness of Career Competencies
Time Frame: 12 weeks
assessed by Career Competencies Questionnaire - 1=low career competencies & 5=high career competencies
12 weeks
Validation of Mobile Career Competencies Intervention
Time Frame: 1 week

Assessed by USE Questionnaire - 1 Very Not Useful & 5 Very Useful

  • Usefulness
  • Ease of Use
  • Ease of Learning
  • System Satisfaction
1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reflection on motivation
Time Frame: 12 weeks
subscale of career competencies and assessed by Career Competencies Questionnaire - 1=low reflection on motivation & 5=high reflection on motivation
12 weeks
Reflection on qualities
Time Frame: 12 weeks
subscale of career competencies and assessed by Career Competencies Questionnaire - 1=low reflection on qualities& 5=high reflection on qualities
12 weeks
Networking
Time Frame: 12 weeks
subscale of career competencies and assessed by Career Competencies Questionnaire - 1=low networking & 5=high networking
12 weeks
Self-profiling
Time Frame: 12 weeks
subscale of career competencies and assessed by Career Competencies Questionnaire - 1=low self-profiling & 5=high self-profiling
12 weeks
Work exploration
Time Frame: 12 weeks
subscale of career competencies and assessed by Career Competencies Questionnaire - 1=low work exploration & 5=high work exploration
12 weeks
Career control
Time Frame: 12 weeks
subscale of career competencies and assessed by Career Competencies Questionnaire - 1=low career control & 5=high career control
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hsin Hung Ho, Master, Public Service Department Malaysia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 23, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Competence

Clinical Trials on Mobile Career Competencies Intervention

3
Subscribe