- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04284072
Clinical Scenarios for Long-term Monitoring of Epileptic Seizures With a Wearable Biopotential Technology (SeizeIT2)
A Multicenter Study to Examine Clinical Scenarios for Long-term Monitoring of Epileptic Seizures With a Wearable Biopotential Technology
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Subjects with refractory epilepsy who are admitted to the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU) for clinically-indicated long-term video-EEG assessment will be simultaneously monitored with Sensor Dots to record electroencephalographic (EEG), electrocardiographic (ECG), electromyographic (EMG), and motion signals.
A subset of subjects will continue using Sensor Dot devices at home (Home Phase) after completing the EMU Phase.
The data recorded by Sensor Dots will be used to: 1) annotate epileptic seizures, which will be compared to the annotations made as part of routine EMU monitoring and seizure diaries kept at home, and 2) to develop seizure detection algorithms. The data collected as part of this study will not be used to influence clinical decision making.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Leuven, Belgium, 3000
- University Hospitals Leuven, department of Neurology
-
-
-
-
-
Aachen, Germany
- Department of Epileptology and Neurology
-
Freiburg, Germany
- Epilepsy Center, University Medical Center, Freiburg University
-
-
-
-
-
Coimbra, Portugal
- Division of Neurology, Coimbra University Hospital
-
-
-
-
-
Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute
-
-
-
-
-
London, United Kingdom
- Division of Neuroscience, King's College London
-
Oxford, United Kingdom
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects (4+ years old) with refractory epilepsy who are admitted to the hospital for clinically-indicated long-term video-EEG assessment or presurgical evaluation, and a high likelihood of experiencing seizures during the EMU Phase
- For subjects continuing into the Home Phase: successful recording of their habitual seizures with Sensor Dot during the EMU Phase
- For subjects continuing into the Home Phase: the ability to keep an e-diary
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known allergies to any of the biopotential electrodes or adhesives used as part of the study protocol
- Having an implanted device, such as (but not limited to) a pacemaker, cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), and/or neural stimulation device because Sensor Dot contains magnets that could interfere with the operation of these devices
- Women who are pregnant
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: All subjects
Single arm study with a device intervention for epileptic seizure monitoring in subjects with refractory focal impaired awareness, tonic-clonic, and/or typical absence seizures.
|
Multimodal (EEG, ECG, EMG and motion) seizure monitoring with Sensor Dot to complement EMU-based video-EEG monitoring (EMU Phase), and optional home-based seizure diary logging (Home Phase).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Comparison of typical absence seizure annotations derived from Sensor Dot data collected during the EMU Phase against annotations derived from video-EEG equipment during wakefulness
Time Frame: up to two weeks
|
F1-score as determined by expert reviewers
|
up to two weeks
|
Comparison of typical absence seizure annotations derived from Sensor Dot data collected during the EMU Phase against annotations derived from video-EEG equipment during sleep
Time Frame: up to two weeks
|
F1-score as determined by expert reviewers
|
up to two weeks
|
Comparison of focal impaired awareness seizure annotations derived from Sensor Dot data collected during the EMU Phase against annotations derived from video-EEG equipment during wakefulness
Time Frame: up to two weeks
|
F1-score as determined by expert reviewers
|
up to two weeks
|
Comparison of focal impaired awareness seizure annotations derived from Sensor Dot data collected during the EMU Phase against annotations derived from video-EEG equipment during sleep
Time Frame: up to two weeks
|
F1-score as determined by expert reviewers
|
up to two weeks
|
Comparison of tonic-clonic seizure annotations derived from Sensor Dot data collected during the EMU Phase against annotations derived from video-EEG equipment during wakefulness
Time Frame: up to two weeks
|
F1-score as determined by expert reviewers
|
up to two weeks
|
Comparison of tonic-clonic seizure annotations derived from Sensor Dot data collected during the EMU Phase against annotations derived from video-EEG equipment during sleep
Time Frame: up to two weeks
|
F1-score as determined by expert reviewers
|
up to two weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Sensor Dot usability
Time Frame: up to two weeks
|
We will assess the usability of the device as perceived by users (patients and healthcare personnel) via surveys
|
up to two weeks
|
To assess seizure duration
Time Frame: up to two weeks
|
From the Sensor Dot data, we will be able to assess seizure duration
|
up to two weeks
|
To assess the usability of the seizure e-diary
Time Frame: up to two weeks
|
We will asses usability of the electronic seizure diary
|
up to two weeks
|
To evaluate the accuracy of automated seizure detection algorithms
Time Frame: 2 years
|
We will use the collected data and seizure annotations to develop algorithms to automatically detect epileptic seizures.
We plan to evaluate how accurate these new automated seizure detection algorithms are.
|
2 years
|
Comparison of seizure annotations derived from Sensor Dot data collected during the Home Phase against seizure diary annotations
Time Frame: up to 2 weeks
|
Accuracy as determined by expert reviewers
|
up to 2 weeks
|
Sensor Dot Performance
Time Frame: up to 2 weeks
|
We will assess the technical performance of the device by comparing the actual length of recorded data against the expected recording length, and what percentage of the data is high quality enough to make seizure annotations.
|
up to 2 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Wim Van Paesschen, MD, PhD, UZ Leuven and KU Leuven
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Fisher RS, Acevedo C, Arzimanoglou A, Bogacz A, Cross JH, Elger CE, Engel J Jr, Forsgren L, French JA, Glynn M, Hesdorffer DC, Lee BI, Mathern GW, Moshe SL, Perucca E, Scheffer IE, Tomson T, Watanabe M, Wiebe S. ILAE official report: a practical clinical definition of epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2014 Apr;55(4):475-82. doi: 10.1111/epi.12550. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
- Kwan P, Brodie MJ. Early identification of refractory epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2000 Feb 3;342(5):314-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200002033420503.
- Gu Y, Cleeren E, Dan J, Claes K, Van Paesschen W, Van Huffel S, Hunyadi B. Comparison between Scalp EEG and Behind-the-Ear EEG for Development of a Wearable Seizure Detection System for Patients with Focal Epilepsy. Sensors (Basel). 2017 Dec 23;18(1):29. doi: 10.3390/s18010029.
- Beniczky S, Polster T, Kjaer TW, Hjalgrim H. Detection of generalized tonic-clonic seizures by a wireless wrist accelerometer: a prospective, multicenter study. Epilepsia. 2013 Apr;54(4):e58-61. doi: 10.1111/epi.12120. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
- Sander JW. The epidemiology of epilepsy revisited. Curr Opin Neurol. 2003 Apr;16(2):165-70. doi: 10.1097/01.wco.0000063766.15877.8e.
- Elger CE, Hoppe C. Diagnostic challenges in epilepsy: seizure under-reporting and seizure detection. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Mar;17(3):279-288. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30038-3.
- Hoppe C, Poepel A, Elger CE. Epilepsy: accuracy of patient seizure counts. Arch Neurol. 2007 Nov;64(11):1595-9. doi: 10.1001/archneur.64.11.1595.
- Kurada AV, Srinivasan T, Hammond S, Ulate-Campos A, Bidwell J. Seizure detection devices for use in antiseizure medication clinical trials: A systematic review. Seizure. 2019 Mar;66:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
- Bidwell J, Khuwatsamrit T, Askew B, Ehrenberg JA, Helmers S. Seizure reporting technologies for epilepsy treatment: A review of clinical information needs and supporting technologies. Seizure. 2015 Nov;32:109-17. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
- Beniczky S, Ryvlin P. Standards for testing and clinical validation of seizure detection devices. Epilepsia. 2018 Jun;59 Suppl 1:9-13. doi: 10.1111/epi.14049.
- Szabo CA, Morgan LC, Karkar KM, Leary LD, Lie OV, Girouard M, Cavazos JE. Electromyography-based seizure detector: Preliminary results comparing a generalized tonic-clonic seizure detection algorithm to video-EEG recordings. Epilepsia. 2015 Sep;56(9):1432-7. doi: 10.1111/epi.13083. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
- Beniczky S, Conradsen I, Wolf P. Detection of convulsive seizures using surface electromyography. Epilepsia. 2018 Jun;59 Suppl 1:23-29. doi: 10.1111/epi.14048.
- Kjaer TW, Sorensen HBD, Groenborg S, Pedersen CR, Duun-Henriksen J. Detection of Paroxysms in Long-Term, Single-Channel EEG-Monitoring of Patients with Typical Absence Seizures. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2017 Jan 9;5:2000108. doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2017.2649491. eCollection 2017.
- Zibrandtsen IC, Kidmose P, Christensen CB, Kjaer TW. Ear-EEG detects ictal and interictal abnormalities in focal and generalized epilepsy - A comparison with scalp EEG monitoring. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Dec;128(12):2454-2461. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.09.115. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
- Dan J, Weckhuysen D, Cleeren E, Van Paesschen W, Vandendriessche B. Technical validation of Sensor Dot: a wearable for ambulatory monitoring of epileptic seizures. 2nd International Congress on mobile devices and seizure detection in epilepsy; Lausanne, Switzerland, 2019.
- Seeck M, Koessler L, Bast T, Leijten F, Michel C, Baumgartner C, He B, Beniczky S. The standardized EEG electrode array of the IFCN. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Oct;128(10):2070-2077. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.254. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- S63631
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- Study Protocol
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Epilepsy
-
NaviFUS CorporationTaipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanCompletedDrug Resistant Epilepsy | Epilepsy, Drug Resistant | Intractable Epilepsy | Refractory Epilepsy | Drug Refractory Epilepsy | Epilepsy, Drug Refractory | Epilepsy, Intractable | Medication Resistant EpilepsyTaiwan
-
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation...Active, not recruitingEpilepsies, Partial | Intractable Epilepsy | Focal Epilepsy | Refractory Epilepsy | Epilepsy Intractable | Epilepsy in Children | Epilepsy, FocalUnited Kingdom
-
University of British ColumbiaTerminatedJuvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy | Childhood Absence Epilepsy | Juvenile Absence EpilepsyCanada
-
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRecruiting
-
Neuroelectrics CorporationRecruitingEpilepsy | Seizures | Refractory Epilepsy | Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic | Epilepsy in Children | Seizures, Focal | Focal SeizureSpain, United States, France, Belgium
-
Oslo University HospitalCompletedEpilepsy | Generalized Epilepsy | Focal EpilepsyNorway
-
UCB Pharma SACompletedEpilepsy, Tonic-clonicPoland, Sweden, Hungary, Czechia
-
UCB PharmaCompletedEpilepsy, Tonic-clonic
-
University Hospital, LilleUnknownFocal Epilepsy | Epilepsy IntractableFrance
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingPeking University; Beijing Tiantan Hospital; Qilu Hospital of Shandong University and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingEpilepsy, Drug ResistantChina
Clinical Trials on Sensor Dot
-
BytefliesUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterCompleted
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenBytefliesActive, not recruiting
-
University Hospital, GhentUniversity Ghent; BytefliesRecruitingProgressive Multiple SclerosisBelgium
-
Centers for Disease Control and PreventionColumbia University; New York City Department of Health and Mental HygieneCompletedTuberculosis | Adherence, Medication | Drug-resistant Tuberculosis | Adherence, PatientUnited States
-
Columbia UniversityNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)Completed
-
University of GeorgiaMakerere UniversityCompleted
-
University of FloridaNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); emocha Mobile Health, Inc.Not yet recruitingPatient Engagement | Health Behavior | Immune Suppression | Heart Transplant Rejection | Medication Nonadherence | Remote Monitoring | Pediatric Heart TransplantUnited States
-
Environment and Health Group, Inc.Completed
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
SightGlass Vision, Inc.University of WaterlooCompletedMyopia, Myopia Progression, Lag of Accommodation, Hyperopic Retinal Blur, Reduction in ContrastCanada