Reducing Fear of Cancer Recurrence in Danish Colorectal Cancer Survivors

September 11, 2025 updated by: Vejle Hospital

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Therapist Guided Internet-delivered Cognitive Therapy (TG-iConquerFear) With Augmented Treatment as Usual in Reducing Fear of Cancer Recurrence in Danish Colorectal Cancer Survivors

Cognitive therapy has been shown to reduce fear of cancer recurrence (FCR), mainly in breast cancer survivors. The accessibility of cognitive behavioural interventions could be further improved by Internet delivery, but self-guided interventions have shown limited efficacy. The aim of this study is to test the efficacy of a therapist guided internet-delivered intervention (TG-iConquerFear) vs. augmented treatment as usual (aTAU) in Danish colorectal cancer survivors.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, early detection, and improved treatment have led to rising survival rates over the past decades. This improvement has resulted in an increasing number of long-term CRC survivors with no residual disease. Most survivors manage to establish a 'new normal' after finishing treatment, but some survivors experience difficulties in normal functioning and decreased quality of life (QoL) due to substantial psychological strain. Anxiety and depression e.g. are reported in 34% of CRC survivors 1-5 years post-diagnosis. One of the most common concerns among cancer survivors is fear of cancer recurrence (FCR), defined as "Fear, worry or concern relating to the possibility that cancer will come back or progress". The severity of self-reported FCR does not seem to differ much according to cancer type and FCR can persist even among very long term survivors. Higher FCR is associated with multiple psychological factors including (health) anxiety, depression, greater uncertainty in illness, perceived risk of recurrence and negative beliefs about worry. An expert consensus on the defining features of clinical FCR suggested, that the following four features are key characteristics of clinical FCR: a) high levels of preoccupation; b) high levels of worry; c) that are persistent; and d) hypervigilance to bodily symptom.

Most CRC survivors report some degree of FCR. The term "clinically significant FCR" is introduced to describe when the strain of FCR becomes clinically important, negatively influencing the life of the survivor. Validated screening questionnaires, such as the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory-Short Form (FCRI-SF), have been used to identify likely cases of clinically significant FCR. Two recent studies report likely clinically significant FCR based on the FCRI-SF among 13,7% and 10,1% of CRC survivors (unpublished data, personal communication with first authors). However, the prevalence of clinical FCR in CRC survivors is still somewhat uncertain, as estimates are based on small studies [n=51-91], or studies with simplistic or unvalidated FCR measures.

Two large cohort studies have focused on patient reported health-related QoL after (colorectal) cancer. The English study includes people "living with and beyond cancer", which does not distinguish between survivors with no residual disease, those living with cancer or with a history of recurrence. Furthermore, FCR is assessed with a single item. A Dutch study based on the PROFILES registry used the Impact of Cancer scale (Health Worries subscale) measure, which does not include a proposed cut-off score for clinical FCR. The current study will provide a more definitive estimate of the prevalence of clinical FCR in CRC survivors.

This study will also explore psychological factors related to FCR in CRC survivors. A cancer diagnosis is life changing and imposes heavy stress on patient and relatives. Together with often numerous physical symptoms and social changes after the cancer treatment, the net sum of stressors may exceed the cancer survivor's ability to adapt. This overload may manifest in the experience of bodily symptoms and in some cases develop into a functional disorder/somatic symptom disorder such as bodily distress syndrome or health anxiety, as proposed by Simonelli et al. Bodily distress syndrome is defined as a condition in which the patient suffers from, usually multiple, bodily symptoms in a characteristic pattern not attributable to verifiable, conventionally defined diseases.

Health anxiety is characterized by preoccupation with fear of having a serious and life-threatening illness with no objective sign of disease, which persists despite medical reassurance. Health anxiety and FCR overlap somewhat, as they both include unpleasant thoughts or ruminations, which interfere with everyday life and may lead to further unnecessary investigations and treatments. One study investigated hypochondriasis in breast cancer survivors and found that 43% of those with a clinical level of FCR met the diagnostic criteria. Two studies of one CRC cohort have measured somatization (i.e. manifestation of physiological distress as physical symptoms), but not links with FCR. To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have investigated the relationship between functional disorders, FCR, anxiety and depression in CRC survivors.

Illness uncertainty has been linked with FCR and health anxiety. When diagnosed asymptomatic through screening, illness uncertainty might by heightened. Therefore, diagnosis via screening may lead to increased issues in coping with the cancer and FCR. The comprehensive Danish Clinical Cancer Registries contain data on the method of diagnosis, namely whether the CRC survivor was diagnosed through the Danish nationwide Colorectal Cancer Screening Program, as opposed to diagnosed as a result of symptoms. This enables research in this unexplored area of psychosocial consequences of screen-detected cancers.

Around one fourth (26,5%) of CRC survivors and 20-56% of people living with and beyond CRC report psychosocial assistance in coping with FCR to be an important unmet need. Randomized controlled trials testing interventions for reducing FCR have primarily been conducted in breast or mixed cancer survivor populations. Most interventions are based on variations of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT). Contemporary CBTs aiming to modify cognitive processes (e.g., attentional bias and beliefs about worry) rather than thought content (e.g. thoughts of death) were more effective (g=0.42 vs 0.24). The delivery format of interventions previously or currently being evaluated has been group, face-to-face, blended, by telephone or by web-based platforms.

"ConquerFear" is an individual face-to-face therapist-delivered intervention with demonstrated efficacy in reducing FCR compared to a relaxation training attention control group of patients with mixed cancers of whom the majority (89%) were women with breast cancer. While use of ConquerFear has been sustained by many study therapists beyond the end of the study, it is a resource and time-consuming approach accessible primarily to those in close proximity to major metropolitan cancer centres with highly trained psychologists. Consequently, a web-based self-management version of ConquerFear has been created (iConquerFear), similar in curriculum content but different in delivery. Qualitative evaluation of the usability of iConquerFear showed: iConquerFear was normalising and empowering; flexible access was key; delivery mode was engaging; tailoring was crucial; links to additional resources were valued.

Web-based interventions have the potential to fill an important gap in quality cancer care by augmenting limited available mental health services. However, there is some evidence that entirely self-guided web-based FCR interventions may have limited efficacy, and it has been suggested that therapist input may increase efficacy. Web-based therapist-guided cognitive therapy has advantages for both patients and providers and effects appear comparable to traditional face-to-face therapy in treating distress in patients with cancer. Evidence suggests that guided web-based interventions are superior to unguided interventions.

Aim The primary aim of this RCT is to test if a therapist-guided version of iConquerFear (TG-iConquerFear) can reduce FCR and improve QoL for CRC survivors more than augmented treatment as usual (aTAU).

Secondary objectives are to i) outline the prevalence of FCR in a population based CRC cohort up to 5 years post-diagnosis using a validated FCR measure with a clinical cut-off. This comprehensive screening will also be used to recruit to the RCT of TG-iConquerFear.

ii) outline the prevalence of anxiety, depression, bodily distress syndrome and health anxiety in a population based CRC cohort up to 5 years post-diagnosis.

iii) investigate whether being diagnosed as a consequence of the Danish Nation-wide Colorectal Cancer Screening Program increases FCR compared to being diagnosed based on physical symptoms and whether this relationship is mediated by increased uncertainty in illness.

iv) investigate whether FCR is associated with anxiety, depression, bodily distress syndrome and health anxiety in CRC survivors, as well as investigate whether uncertainty in illness, negative beliefs about worry and perceived risk of cancer recurrence act as moderators or mediators of these relationships.

v) examine the cost-effectiveness of the TG-iConquerFear intervention versus aTAU.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vejle, Denmark, 7100
        • Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Completed curative intent colorectal cancer treatment with surgery and/or radiation and/or adjuvant chemotherapy between 1 March 2014 and 31 December 2018
  • No history of recurrence after primary operation
  • Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory score of 22 or above (14)
  • Age 18 or above
  • Reads and understands Danish
  • Access and ability to use Internet

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cancer recurrence at any follow-up
  • Inability to comply with the protocol due to severe psychiatric, cognitive disorder or substance abuse identified during telephone interview
  • As the intervention is web-based, participants without knowledge of or access to the Internet will be excluded from the RCT (including dyslexia).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TG-iConquerFear
The participant is guided through the web-based sessions by minimum weekly contact with an experienced therapist (estimated ½ hour/week for 10 weeks). The therapist will motivate, answer questions and give feedback on written material and exercises.
The theoretical frame of iConquerFear is based on the Common-Sense Model of illness, the Self-Regulatory Executive Function model and Relational Frame Theory. The intervention includes elements of attention training, increasing metacognitive awareness, acceptance & mindfulness, promotion of appropriate screening behavior, and values-based goal setting. The electronic platform comprises 5 modules containing educational text, interactive exercises, short videos featuring doctors, therapists and patients' perspectives.
Active Comparator: Augmented treatment as usual
The control group is described as "augmented" treatment as usual (aTAU), since the diagnostic telephone interview exceeds standard treatment. Further more, the participants will be referred to a website with a non-guided, publicly available E-learning program in cancer rehabilitation hosted by the Region of Central Jutland (livogkraeft.rm.dk). In addition to written material the website includes self-help instructions for meditation.
Active control group
Other Names:
  • Augmented treatment as usual

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of total score on Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory (FCRI) from baseline to 2nd follow-up
Time Frame: 3 months post-intervention
Questionnaire
3 months post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of total score on Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory (FCRI) from baseline
Time Frame: 1-14 days after intervention and after 6 and 12 months
Questionnaire
1-14 days after intervention and after 6 and 12 months
Change in Bodily Distress Syndrome from baseline as evaluated by the BDS Checklist
Time Frame: 1-14 days after intervention and after 6 and 12 months
Questionnaire
1-14 days after intervention and after 6 and 12 months
Change in anxiety and depression from baseline as evaluated by the relevant Symptom Checklist-90-R
Time Frame: 1-14 days after intervention and after 6 and 12 months
Questionnaire
1-14 days after intervention and after 6 and 12 months
Change in health anxiety from baseline as measured by the Whiteley-6 index
Time Frame: 1-14 days after intervention and after 6 and 12 months
Questionnaire
1-14 days after intervention and after 6 and 12 months
Evaluation of cost-effectiveness of TG-iConquerFear
Time Frame: Max. 27 months
Information will be extracted from Danish registries.
Max. 27 months
Comparison of changes in health care usage between intervention arm and aTAU
Time Frame: Max. 27 months
Information will be extracted from Danish registries.
Max. 27 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in uncertainty in illness as evaluated by Mishels Uncertainty of Illness Scale (MUIS).
Time Frame: Twice during the intervention, 1-14 days after the intervention and after 3, 6, and 12 months
Process measures. Questionnaire
Twice during the intervention, 1-14 days after the intervention and after 3, 6, and 12 months
Change of negative beliefs about worry evaluated by MetaCognitions Questionnaire-30.
Time Frame: Twice during the intervention, 1-14 days after the intervention and after 3, 6, and 12 months
Process measures. Questionnaire
Twice during the intervention, 1-14 days after the intervention and after 3, 6, and 12 months
Perceived risk of recurrence measured by the visual analogue scale from 1-100
Time Frame: Twice during the intervention, 1-14 days after the intervention and after 3, 6, and 12 months
Process measures. Scale.
Twice during the intervention, 1-14 days after the intervention and after 3, 6, and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Lars Henrik Jensen, MD, PhD, Vejle Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 12, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data will be available up on request

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colorectal Cancer

  • University of California, San Francisco
    Completed
    Stage IV Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC... and other conditions
    United States
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
    National Cancer Institute (NCI)
    Terminated
    Rectal Cancer | Colon Cancer | Cancer Survivor | Colorectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage I Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage... and other conditions
    United States
  • University of Southern California
    National Cancer Institute (NCI)
    Active, not recruiting
    Stage IV Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC... and other conditions
    United States
  • M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
    Recruiting
    Colorectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage... and other conditions
    United States
  • Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas...
    United States Department of Defense
    Active, not recruiting
    Colorectal Adenoma | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage 0 Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage I Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIA Colorectal... and other conditions
    United States
  • M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
    National Cancer Institute (NCI)
    Active, not recruiting
    Stage IV Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC... and other conditions
    United States
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences
    National Cancer Institute (NCI)
    Completed
    Cancer Survivor | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage I Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Colorectal... and other conditions
    United States
  • Emory University
    Bristol-Myers Squibb; National Cancer Institute (NCI); National Institutes of...
    Completed
    Colorectal Cancer Metastatic | Colorectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IV Colorectal Cancer | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer | Refractory Colorectal Carcinoma | Metastatic Microsatellite Stable Colorectal Carcinoma | Stage IVC Colorectal Cancer
    United States
  • University of Roma La Sapienza
    Completed
    Colorectal Cancer Stage II | Colorectal Cancer Stage III | Colorectal Cancer Stage IV | Colorectal Cancer Stage 0 | Colorectal Cancer Stage I
    Italy
  • University of Southern California
    National Cancer Institute (NCI); Amgen
    Terminated
    Stage IV Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Colorectal Adenocarcinoma | RAS Wild Type | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer...
    United States

Clinical Trials on TG-iConquerFear

Subscribe